Optimal measurement design for parameter identification in mechanized tunneling

Abstract When performing shallow tunnel construction, settlements on the ground surface often cannot be prevented. Anticipating these surface displacements is only possible with profound knowledge of the constitutive parameters of the surrounding soil. Performing inverse analysis on the basis of in situ settlement data is an efficient method for obtaining such information. However, during this process, considering which measurement arrangement can provide the most reliable results is generally neglected. This aspect is addressed in this study by applying the so-called “optimal experimental design” to the mechanized tunneling field. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is firstly performed to determine the most relevant model parameters to be identified via back analysis, by employing the considered numerical model and experimental data. Furthermore, the GSA results are utilized to determine where and when measurements should be performed to minimize uncertainty in the identified constitutive parameters. The optimal experimental design (OED) concept is further applied to evaluate the observation set-up efficiency for damage mitigation measures within a representative synthetic example of a tunneling project passing beneath an existing building. Parameter identification based on synthetic noisy experiments is performed to validate the presented method for optimal experimental design. Thus, the soil stiffness and strength parameters are identified according to both an intuitive and the elaborated method, employing the proposed OED strategy and experimental designs, making it possible to assess the feasibility of the OED results.

[1]  Daniela Boldini,et al.  3D numerical modelling of soil–structure interaction during EPB tunnelling , 2015 .

[2]  Günther Meschke,et al.  A numerical study of the effect of soil and grout material properties and cover depth in shield tunnelling , 2006 .

[3]  Volker Schulz,et al.  Optimal measurement selection for piezoelectric material tensor identification , 2008 .

[4]  David M. Potts,et al.  The Influence of Building weight on Tunnelling-Induced Ground and Building Deformation , 2004 .

[5]  Markus König,et al.  Robust and reliable metamodels for mechanized tunnel simulations , 2014 .

[6]  Raoul Hölter,et al.  Mechanized tunneling induced building settlements and design of optimal monitoring strategies based on sensitivity field , 2018 .

[7]  Peter Mark,et al.  Prediction of tunnel lining forces and deformations using analytical and numerical solutions , 2017 .

[8]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Identification of constitutive parameters of soil using an optimization strategy and statistical analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Model validation and calibration via back analysis for mechanized tunnel simulations – The Western Scheldt tunnel case , 2015 .

[10]  A Kremling,et al.  Optimal experimental design with the sigma point method. , 2009, IET systems biology.

[11]  André Bardow,et al.  Optimal experimental design of ill-posed problems: The METER approach , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[13]  KnabeTina,et al.  Calibration of constitutive parameters by inverse analysis for a geotechnical boundary problem , 2012 .

[14]  Xiaoli Liu,et al.  Information Entropy in Predicting Location of Observation Points for Long Tunnel , 2017, Entropy.

[15]  Elham Mahmoudi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification of a time dependent constitutive model for rock salt , 2016, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[16]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Behavior of Shallow Strip Footing on Twin Voids , 2016, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[17]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[18]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[19]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[20]  David M. Potts,et al.  A STRUCTURE'S INFLUENCE ON TUNNELLING-INDUCED GROUND MOVEMENTS. , 1997 .

[21]  Tom Schanz,et al.  The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification , 2019, Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics.

[22]  D. Ucinski Optimal measurement methods for distributed parameter system identification , 2004 .

[23]  Markus König,et al.  A probabilistic analysis of subsoil parameters uncertainty impacts on tunnel-induced ground movements with a back-analysis study , 2015 .

[24]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for subsoil parameter estimation in mechanized tunneling , 2014 .

[25]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Numerical modeling and inverse parameter estimation of the large-scale mass movement Gradenbach in Carinthia (Austria) , 2013 .

[26]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  An approach to evaluate the efficiency of compensation grouting , 2014 .

[27]  Andrea Pigorini,et al.  Building response to tunnelling , 2014 .

[28]  Tom Schanz,et al.  Identification of Constitutive and Geometrical Parame- ters for Slope Instability Modelling - Application to Mountain-Splitting Area Reutte/Tyrol (Austria)_________ , 2009 .