Lesions to the Motor System Affect Action Perception

Several studies have shown that the motor system is involved in action perception, suggesting that action concepts are represented through sensory–motor processes. Such conclusions imply that motor system impairments should diminish action perception. To test this hypothesis, a group of 10 brain-damaged patients with hemiplegia (specifically, a lesion at the motor system that affected the contralesional arm) viewed point-light displays of arm gestures and attempted to name each gesture. To create the dynamic stimuli, patients individually performed simple gestures with their unaffected arm while being videotaped. The videotapes were converted into point-light animations. Each action was presented as it had been performed, that is, as having been produced by the observer's unaffected arm, and in its mirror reversed orientation, that is, as having been produced by the observer's hemiplegic arm. Action recognition accuracy by patients with hemiplegia was compared with that by 8 brain-damaged patients without any motor deficit and by 10 healthy controls. Overall, performance was better in control observers than in patients. Most importantly, performance by hemiplegic patients, but not by nonhemiplegic patients and controls, varied systematically as a function of the observed limb. Action recognition was best when hemiplegic patients viewed actions that appeared to have been performed by their unaffected arm. Action recognition performance dropped significantly when hemiplegic patients viewed actions that appeared to have been produced with their hemiplegic arm or the corresponding arm of another person. The results of a control study involving the recognition of point-light defined animals in motion indicate that a generic deficit to visual and cognitive functions cannot account for this laterality-specific deficit in action recognition. Taken together, these results suggest that motor cortex impairment decreases visual sensitivity to human action. Specifically, when a cortical lesion renders an observer incapable of performing an observed action, action perception is compromised, possibly by a failure to map the observed action onto the observer's contralesional hemisoma.

[1]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[5]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Lucia M Vaina,et al.  Perceptual deficits in patients with impaired recognition of biological motion after temporal lobe lesions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Walking perception by walking observers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[10]  S. Cochin,et al.  Visual perception in children: human, animal and virtual movement activates different cortical areas. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  K. Thuomas,et al.  CT and MR evaluation of pericardial and retrosternal adhesions after cardiac surgery. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  G. Mather,et al.  Recognition of Animal Locomotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays , 1993, Perception.

[14]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[16]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[20]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J Faubert,et al.  Independence of Contour and Biological-Motion Cues for Motion-Defined Animal Shapes , 1998, Perception.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  N. Troje,et al.  Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[26]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  The Sound of Actions in Apraxia , 2008, Current Biology.

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Neural Underpinnings of Gesture Discrimination in Patients with Limb Apraxia , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[31]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[32]  T. Heinen,et al.  Die Fähigkeiten von Athleten verändern deren Wahrnehmung von Handlungen , 2010 .

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[36]  A. Saygin Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  J. Pineda,et al.  Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  D. Tranel,et al.  Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions , 2012, Cortex.

[39]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Perception of biological motion in parietal patients , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Knowledge of one’s kinematics improves perceptual discrimination , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[45]  Uta Frith,et al.  Your Own Action Influences How You Perceive Another Person's Action , 2004, Current Biology.

[46]  V. Gallese Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  E. Renzi,et al.  Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. , 1980, Archives of neurology.