Le degré d'expertise a-t-il une influence sur la perception olfactive? Quelques éléments de réponse dans le domaine du vin

We compare the olfactive dimensions used by expert and novice wine tasters to describe and categorise a series of 13 red burgundy wines. Verbal and nonverbal approaches have been used in parallel. The verbal approach included a communication task and a description task. Pairs of assessors were asked to match a series of samples based only on verbal exchanges. All the generated terms were recorded and the most frequently used terms served as a basis for the description task. The non-verbal approach included a similarity judgement task. Multivariate analyses have been used to analyse the data. Results show that (1) both groups of subjects were able to perform the communication task reasonably well and to generate a coherent set of descriptors, (2) the two groups of subjects used an equivalent number of dimensions to describe and categorise the wines, and (3) the two groups of subjects used the same dimensions for the non-verbal task, but different dimensions for the verbal task. This dissociation between verbal and non-verbal task suggests that the perceptual representation of wine is similar for the two groups of subjects but that the verbalisation of this representation varies with expertise level. Subjects with a higher level of expertise tend to use analytical terms whereas subjects with a lower level tend to use holistic terms.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[3]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[4]  B. Berglund,et al.  Multidimensional analysis of twenty-one odors. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[5]  B M Ross,et al.  Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .

[7]  R. Erickson,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING OF ODORANTS: EXAMINATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL DIMENSIONS , 1977 .

[8]  E. Holman,et al.  Similarity judgments and recognition memory for some common spices , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[10]  E. E. Johns,et al.  Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Gillian M. Arnold,et al.  A comparison of the aromas of six coffees characterised by conventional profiling, free‐choice profiling and similarity scaling methods , 1985 .

[12]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[13]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[14]  M. D. Rabin Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  H. Lawless Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis , 1989 .

[16]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Olfactory perception and olfactory imagery: a multidimensional analysis. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Le traitement de l'information olfactive , 1994 .

[18]  J. Schooler,et al.  The Misremembrance of Wines Past: Verbal and Perceptual Expertise Differentially Mediate Verbal Overshadowing of Taste Memory , 1996 .

[19]  D. G. Laing,et al.  Influence of training and experience on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Nordin,et al.  Perceptual Learning in Olfaction Professional Wine Tasters versus Controls , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  K J Vicente,et al.  An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. , 1998, Psychological review.