A mixed displacement-pressure formulation for numerical analysis of plastic failure

Abstract Finite elements used for analysis of plastic failure must admit near incompressible behaviour for meaningful results whenever the plastic flow rule is isochoric. Most of the classical elements based on displacement formulations present problems to a greater or lesser extent when obtaining limit loads and failure mechanisms. Mixed pressure-displacement formulations are a suitable alternative, but not every combination of interpolation functions for pressures and displacements is allowed, since they have to satisfy Babuska-Brezzi conditions or pass a patch test for convergence. This excludes interpolations of the same order for both fields unless special techniques are used. This paper describes the formulation of mixed displacement-pressure elements with the same order of interpolation, and presents application to elastic and contained viscoplastic failure problems. It is shown how such different elements, like the T3P3 (linear displacements and pressures triangle) or the T6P6 (quadratic triangle in both variables), avoid volumetric locking and circumvent above mentioned restrictions. Indeed the formulation allows arbitrary interpolations as all restrictions are removed. However, the proposed formulation does not improve other aspects of element behaviour such as bending, and, therefore, the linear triangle is not recommended. Finally, performance of the quadratic T6P6 triangle is assessed using boundary value problems for which analytical solutions are available. Robustness against distortion is checked, and a good overall performance of this element is found

[1]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A CLASS OF MIXED ASSUMED STRAIN METHODS AND THE METHOD OF INCOMPATIBLE MODES , 1990 .

[2]  M. Hafez,et al.  Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics: Numerical Solution of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in Primitive Variables on Unstaggered Grids , 1991 .

[3]  D. Malkus,et al.  Mixed finite element methods—reduced and selective integration techniques: a unification of concepts , 1990 .

[4]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[5]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  The patch test for mixed formulations , 1986 .

[6]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Incompressibility without tears—HOW to avoid restrictions of mixed formulation , 1991 .

[7]  I. Babuska The finite element method with Lagrangian multipliers , 1973 .

[8]  F. Wubs Notes on numerical fluid mechanics , 1985 .

[9]  E. Wilson,et al.  A non-conforming element for stress analysis , 1976 .

[10]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Localization problems in plasticity using finite elements with adaptive remeshing , 1995 .

[11]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuscka-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of , 1986 .

[12]  M. Randolph,et al.  NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF COLLAPSE LOADS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHODS , 1982 .

[13]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  Applied Functional Analysis and Variational Methods in Engineering , 1986 .

[14]  J. C. Rice,et al.  On numerically accurate finite element solutions in the fully plastic range , 1990 .