Automatic and attentional components in perception of shape-at-a-slant

In perceiving shape-at-a-slant it is assumed that a sequence of operations is executed. The aim of these experiments was to determine the extent to which execution of these operations requires allocation of attention. Three hypotheses were considered: zero automaticity--that all of the operations require attention; partial automaticity--that the operations culminating in a representation of projective shape and slant-in-depth are automatic while the combinatorial operations culminating in a distally correlated shape require attention; full automaticity--that the entire sequence of operations is automatic, proceeding without allocation of attention. To decide among these hypotheses, subjects performed forced-choice shape recognition tests under two conditions: In the shape-directed condition subjects were motivated to process shape. In the numerosity-directed condition subjects were motivated to direct attention to discrimination of numerosity, thereby causing attention to be diverted from processing of shape. Examination of the pattern of choices on the recognition test showed results that conformed best to the hypothesis of partial automaticity. Language: en

[1]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J M VANDERPLAS,et al.  The association value of random shapes. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Joan E. Regan,et al.  Automaticity and learning: Effects of familiarity on naming letters. , 1981 .

[6]  I. Rock,et al.  An introduction to perception , 1975 .

[7]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981 .

[8]  I Rock,et al.  Form Perception without Attention , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Selective attention in vision: recognition memory for superimposed line drawings. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  G Hatfield,et al.  Functional equivalence of masking and cue reduction in perception of shape at a slant , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. , 1981 .

[14]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceived shape at a slant as a function of processing time and processing load. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[16]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Time and intensity as determiners of perceived shape. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.