Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management

BACKGROUND Resource barriers complicate diabetes care management. Support from peers may help patients manage their diabetes. OBJECTIVE To compare a reciprocal peer-support (RPS) program with nurse care management (NCM). DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00320112) SETTING 2 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. PATIENTS 244 men with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels greater than 7.5% during the previous 6 months. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was 6-month change in HbA(1c) level. Secondary outcomes were changes in insulin therapy; blood pressure; and patient reports of medication adherence, diabetes-related support, and emotional distress. INTERVENTION Patients in the RPS group attended an initial group session to set diabetes-related behavioral goals, receive peer communication skills training, and be paired with another age-matched peer patient. Peers were encouraged to talk weekly using a telephone platform that recorded call occurrence and provided reminders to promote peer contact. These patients could also participate in optional group sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients in the NCM group attended a 1.5-hour educational session and were assigned to a nurse care manager. RESULTS Of the 244 patients enrolled, 216 (89%) completed the HbA(1c) assessments and 231 (95%) completed the survey assessments at 6 months. Mean HbA(1c) level decreased from 8.02% to 7.73% (change, -0.29%) in the RPS group and increased from 7.93% to 8.22% (change, 0.29%) in the NCM group. The difference in HbA(1c) change between groups was 0.58% (P = 0.004). Among patients with a baseline HbA(1c) level greater than 8.0%, those in the RPS group had a mean decrease of 0.88%, compared with a 0.07% decrease among those in the NCM group (between-group difference, 0.81%; P < 0.001). Eight patients in the RPS group started insulin therapy, compared with 1 patient in the NCM group (P = 0.020). Groups did not differ in blood pressure, self-reported medication adherence, or diabetes-specific distress, but the RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support. LIMITATION The study included only male veterans and lasted only 6 months. CONCLUSION Reciprocal peer support holds promise as a method for diabetes care management.

[1]  M. Gallant The Influence of Social Support on Chronic Illness Self-Management: A Review and Directions for Research , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[2]  Gary King,et al.  The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation , 2009, 0910.3752.

[3]  Sumant R Ranji,et al.  Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 6: Prevention of Healthcare–Associated Infections) , 2007 .

[4]  M. Porta,et al.  A randomised controlled clinical trial of nurse-, dietitian- and pedagogistled Group Care for the management of Type 2 diabetes , 2008, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[5]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  W. Elliott,et al.  Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1. Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans. A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure ResearchPickering , 2006 .

[7]  B. Zinman,et al.  Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  Stephen Rollnick,et al.  Health Behavior Change: A Guide for Practitioners , 1999 .

[10]  D. Fedele,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic reliability of DCA 2000 for rapid and simple monitoring of HbA1c , 2000, Acta Diabetologica.

[11]  M. Korytkowski,et al.  When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin , 2002, International Journal of Obesity.

[12]  C. Griffiths,et al.  How effective are expert patient (lay led) education programmes for chronic disease? , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Robert M. Anderson,et al.  Developing a New Generation of Ongoing Diabetes Self-management Support Interventions , 2005, The Diabetes educator.

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[15]  L. Donaldson Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  D. Ronis,et al.  Brief report: the burden of diabetes therapy: implications for the design of effective patient-centered treatment regimens. , 2005, Journal of general internal medicine.

[17]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[18]  C. Sosnowski,et al.  [Commentary to the article: Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, et al. ADOPT Study Group. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2427-43]. , 2007, Kardiologia polska.

[19]  K. Lorig,et al.  Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. , 2001, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[20]  D. Washington,et al.  Veteran Identity and Race/Ethnicity: Influences on VA Outpatient Care Utilization , 2002, Medical care.

[21]  K. Shojania,et al.  Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. , 2006, JAMA.

[22]  C. Dennis,et al.  Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. , 2003, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  J. Leahy,et al.  Improvements in Diabetes Processes of Care and Intermediate Outcomes: United States, 1988–2002Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, et al (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga) Ann Intern Med 144:465–474, 2006§ , 2007 .

[24]  Vic Hasselblad,et al.  Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illnesswhich ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[26]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Peer Coaching: An Intervention for Individuals Struggling With Diabetes , 2001, The Diabetes educator.

[27]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[28]  P W Lavori,et al.  A multiple imputation strategy for clinical trials with truncation of patient data. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[30]  C. Caspersen,et al.  The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  Dylan M. Smith,et al.  The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[32]  J. Piette,et al.  I Help You, and You Help Me , 2005, The Diabetes educator.

[33]  M. Funnell,et al.  Self-Management Support for Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes , 2004, The Diabetes educator.

[34]  J. Dale,et al.  Peer support telephone calls for improving health. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Do Internet-Based Support Interventions Change Perceptions of Social Support?: An Experimental Trial of Approaches for Supporting Diabetes Self-Management , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[36]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[37]  J. Pugh,et al.  NIDDM Patients' Fears and Hopes About Insulin Therapy: The basis of patient reluctance , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[38]  Amiram D Vinokur,et al.  Providing Social Support May Be More Beneficial Than Receiving It , 2003, Psychological science.

[39]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[40]  C. Lenfant,et al.  National High Blood Pressure Education Program. , 1986, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[41]  W. Manning,et al.  Starting insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: effectiveness, complications, and resource utilization. , 1997, JAMA.

[42]  C. Schwartz,et al.  Helping others helps oneself: response shift effects in peer support. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[43]  W. Baine,et al.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2006, Italian Journal of Public Health.

[44]  V. Helgeson,et al.  Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: who benefits from what? , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[45]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. , 2005, Hypertension.

[46]  J. Piette,et al.  Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[47]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-management , 2009, The Diabetes educator.

[48]  Vic Hasselblad,et al.  A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[49]  C. Schmid,et al.  Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[50]  E. Wagner,et al.  Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[51]  R. Sugden Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[52]  Rodney A Hayward,et al.  Mechanisms for racial and ethnic disparities in glycemic control in middle-aged and older Americans in the health and retirement study. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[53]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[55]  E. Okonofua,et al.  Group Visits: Promoting Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[56]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. , 2003, Hypertension.