Evolutionary integration and modularity in the archosaur cranium.

Complex structures, like the vertebrate skull, are composed of numerous elements or traits that must develop and evolve in a coordinated manner to achieve multiple functions. The strength of association among phenotypic traits (i.e., integration), and their organization into highly-correlated, semi-independent subunits termed modules, is a result of the pleiotropic and genetic correlations that generate traits. As such, patterns of integration and modularity are thought to be key factors constraining or facilitating the evolution of phenotypic disparity by influencing the patterns of variation upon which selection can act. It is often hypothesized that selection can reshape patterns of integration, parceling single structures into multiple modules or merging ancestrally semi-independent traits into a strongly correlated unit. However, evolutionary shifts in patterns of trait integration are seldom assessed in a unified quantitative framework. Here, we quantify patterns of evolutionary integration among regions of the archosaur skull to investigate whether patterns of cranial integration are conserved or variable across this diverse group. Using high-dimensional geometric morphometric data from 3D surface scans and CT scans of modern birds (n = 352), fossil non-avian dinosaurs (n = 27), and modern and fossil mesoeucrocodylians (n = 38), we demonstrate that some aspects of cranial integration are conserved across these taxonomic groups, despite their major differences in cranial form, function, and development. All three groups are highly modular and consistently exhibit high integration within the occipital region. However, there are also substantial divergences in correlation patterns. Birds uniquely exhibit high correlation between the pterygoid and quadrate, components of the cranial kinesis apparatus, whereas the non-avian dinosaur quadrate is more closely associated with the jugal and quadratojugal. Mesoeucrocodylians exhibit a slightly more integrated facial skeleton overall than the other grades. Overall, patterns of trait integration are shown to be stable among archosaurs, which is surprising given the cranial diversity exhibited by the clade. At the same time, evolutionary innovations such as cranial kinesis that reorganize the structure and function of complex traits can result in modifications of trait correlations and modularity.

[1]  R. Müller,et al.  Taxon sample and character coding deeply impact unstable branches in phylogenetic trees of dinosaurs , 2019 .

[2]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  High-density three-dimensional morphometric analyses support conserved static (intraspecific) modularity in caecilian (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) crania , 2019, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

[3]  J. Tobias,et al.  Dietary niche and the evolution of cranial morphology in birds , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[4]  A. Turner,et al.  Evolutionary structure and timing of major habitat shifts in Crocodylomorpha , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  D. Gower,et al.  Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  R. Felice,et al.  A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  J. O’Connor,et al.  Dinosaur ossification centres in embryonic birds uncover developmental evolution of the skull , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[8]  Christopher R. Cooney,et al.  Correlates of rate heterogeneity in avian ecomorphological traits , 2018, Ecology letters.

[9]  M. Zelditch,et al.  Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  A. Evin,et al.  Shape variation and modularity of skull and teeth in domesticated horses and wild equids , 2018, Frontiers in Zoology.

[11]  A. Hartstone‐Rose,et al.  Do Muscles Constrain Skull Shape Evolution in Strepsirrhines? , 2018, Anatomical record.

[12]  James Sharpe,et al.  Quantification of gene expression patterns to reveal the origins of abnormal morphogenesis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  R. Felice,et al.  Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Benton,et al.  Untangling the dinosaur family tree , 2017, Nature.

[15]  J. Vinther,et al.  Multiple optimality criteria support Ornithoscelida , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[16]  M. Norell,et al.  The skull roof tracks the brain during the evolution and development of reptiles including birds , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[17]  P. Barrett,et al.  A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution , 2017, Nature.

[18]  J. Maier,et al.  A new developmental mechanism for the separation of the mammalian middle ear ossicles from the jaw , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Christopher R. Cooney,et al.  Mega-evolutionary dynamics of the adaptive radiation of birds , 2017, Nature.

[20]  Min Wang,et al.  A Comparative Morphological Study of the Jugal and Quadratojugal in Early Birds and Their Dinosaurian Relatives , 2017, Anatomical record.

[21]  M. Westneat,et al.  Linkage mechanisms in the vertebrate skull: Structure and function of three‐dimensional, parallel transmission systems , 2016, Journal of morphology.

[22]  A. Cardini Lost in the Other Half: Improving Accuracy in Geometric Morphometric Analyses of One Side of Bilaterally Symmetric Structures. , 2016, Systematic biology.

[23]  Tetsuto Miyashita Fishing for jaws in early vertebrate evolution: a new hypothesis of mandibular confinement , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  J. Finarelli,et al.  EMMLi: A maximum likelihood approach to the analysis of modularity , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  J. Hanken,et al.  Homology of the cranial vault in birds: new insights based on embryonic fate-mapping and character analysis , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[26]  S N Patek,et al.  Competing influences on morphological modularity in biomechanical systems: a case study in mantis shrimp , 2016, Evolution & development.

[27]  D. Adams Evaluating modularity in morphometric data: challenges with the RV coefficient and a new test measure , 2016 .

[28]  E. Rayfield,et al.  The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  W. Parr,et al.  Cranial Shape and the Modularity of Hybridization in Dingoes and Dogs; Hybridization Does Not Spell the End for Native Morphology , 2016, Evolutionary Biology.

[30]  M. Goodwin,et al.  The Early Expression of Squamosal Horns and Parietal Ornamentation Confirmed by New End-Stage Juvenile Pachycephalosaurus Fossils from the Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation, Montana , 2016, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

[31]  Anne-Claire Fabre,et al.  Tools for quantitative form description; an evaluation of different software packages for semi-landmark analysis , 2015, PeerJ.

[32]  J. Townsend,et al.  A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing , 2015, Nature.

[33]  A. Abzhanov,et al.  A molecular mechanism for the origin of a key evolutionary innovation, the bird beak and palate, revealed by an integrative approach to major transitions in vertebrate history , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  F. O’Keefe,et al.  The fossil record of phenotypic integration and modularity: A deep-time perspective on developmental and evolutionary dynamics , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  E. Wilberg What's in an Outgroup? The Impact of Outgroup Choice on the Phylogenetic Position of Thalattosuchia (Crocodylomorpha) and the Origin of Crocodyliformes. , 2015, Systematic biology.

[36]  A. Haber The Evolution of Morphological Integration in the Ruminant Skull , 2015, Evolutionary Biology.

[37]  D. Adams,et al.  A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high-dimensional data , 2014, Heredity.

[38]  A. Goswami,et al.  The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  C. Klingenberg Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  L. Teresi,et al.  Morphological integration and functional modularity in the crocodilian skull. , 2014, Integrative zoology.

[41]  E. Rayfield,et al.  Morphological and biomechanical disparity of crocodile-line archosaurs following the end-Triassic extinction , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  S. Santana,et al.  Does nasal echolocation influence the modularity of the mammal skull? , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[43]  J. Choiniere,et al.  Rates of dinosaur limb evolution provide evidence for exceptional radiation in Mesozoic birds , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Jesús Marugán-Lobón,et al.  Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. , 2013, Systematic biology.

[45]  D. Adams,et al.  geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data , 2013 .

[46]  Michelle R. Quayle,et al.  Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global diversity of birds in space and time , 2012, Nature.

[48]  D. Bapst,et al.  paleotree: an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution , 2012 .

[49]  Fernando Racimo,et al.  Birds have paedomorphic dinosaur skulls , 2012, Nature.

[50]  A. Abzhanov,et al.  ROLES FOR MODULARITY AND CONSTRAINT IN THE EVOLUTION OF CRANIAL DIVERSITY AMONG ANOLIS LIZARDS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  M. Suchard,et al.  Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7 , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[52]  S. Nesbitt The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades , 2011 .

[53]  G. Wagner,et al.  The pleiotropic structure of the genotype–phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  H. Larsson,et al.  Cretaceous Crocodyliforms from the Sahara , 2009 .

[55]  Trish E. Parsons,et al.  Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[56]  E. Rayfield,et al.  Morphospace occupation in thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs: skull shape variation, species delineation and temporal patterns , 2009 .

[57]  Z. Gasparini,et al.  Skull anatomy of Dakosaurus andiniensis (Thalattosuchia: Crocodylomorpha) and the phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia , 2009 .

[58]  V. Weisbecker,et al.  Developmental modularity and the marsupial-placental dichotomy. , 2009, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[59]  A. Porto,et al.  The Evolution of Modularity in the Mammalian Skull I: Morphological Integration Patterns and Magnitudes , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[60]  P. Gunz,et al.  Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls – a 3D geometric morphometric approach , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[61]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity , 2008 .

[62]  E. Márquez,et al.  A Statistical Framework for Testing Modularity in Multidimensional Data , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  D. Houle,et al.  Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[64]  Emily J Rayfield,et al.  Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: A combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach , 2008, Journal of morphology.

[65]  L. Densmore,et al.  Evidence for placing the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) into the family Gavialidae: inferences from nuclear gene sequences. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[66]  R. E. Heinrich,et al.  EARLIEST KNOWN CARNIVORAN AUDITORY BULLA AND SUPPORT FOR A RECENT ORIGIN OF CROWN‐GROUP CARNIVORA (EUTHERIA, MAMMALIA) , 2006 .

[67]  A. Goswami Cranial Modularity Shifts during Mammalian Evolution , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[68]  M. Benton,et al.  Early dinosaurs: A phylogenetic study , 2006 .

[69]  Markus Forsberg,et al.  Functional morphology , 2004, ICFP '04.

[70]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[71]  C. Brochu PHYLOGENETIC APPROACHES TOWARD CROCODYLIAN HISTORY , 2003 .

[72]  J. Marugán-Lobón,et al.  Disparity and geometry of the skull in Archosauria (Reptilia: Diapsida) , 2003 .

[73]  Rob DeSalle,et al.  Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[74]  J. Cheverud,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PHENOTYPIC VARIATION AND COVARIATION PATTERNS AND THE ROLE OF PHYLOGENY, ECOLOGY, AND ONTOGENY DURING CRANIAL EVOLUTION OF NEW WORLD MONKEYS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[75]  C. Brochu,et al.  Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[76]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[77]  J. Cheverud Developmental Integration and the Evolution of Pleiotropy , 1996 .

[78]  J. Cheverud Morphological Integration in the Saddle-Back Tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) Cranium , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[79]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[80]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[81]  J. Cheverud PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[82]  Walter J. Bock,et al.  Kinetics of the avian skull , 1964 .

[83]  Stefan Schlager,et al.  Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R: R-Packages for Geometric Morphometrics, Shape Analysis and Surface Manipulations , 2017 .

[84]  Doreen Eichel,et al.  Morphometric Tools For Landmark Data Geometry And Biology , 2016 .

[85]  Owl,et al.  New World Monkeys , 2013 .

[86]  Dennis E. Slice,et al.  Modern Morphometrics In Physical Anthropology , 2005 .

[87]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[88]  J. Baumel,et al.  Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium , 1993 .

[89]  M. Ferguson The structure and development of the palate in Alligator mississippiensis. , 1981, Archives of oral biology.

[90]  H. Seeley I. On the classification of the fossil animals commonly named Dinosauria , 1888, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[91]  Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodyli a , 2022 .