PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Original Studies Intragraft Pressures Predict Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients With Graft Outflow Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Objectives: This study is to introduce intragraft pressure (IGP) as intraprocedural parameter for outcome survey in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow lesions undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Background: The role of IGP on procedural endpoint and patency is unknown. Methods: Seventy‐five participants with graft outflow lesions receiving PTA were enrolled. Procedural data regarding IGP and angiographic findings were collected and the 1‐year graft patency through collaboration with hemodialysis units. Analyses and comparisons among IGP, angiographic findings, and patency were conducted. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, we intended to detect significance and the cut‐off points of IGP for patency prediction, and difference in patency between the two groups divided by using the cut‐off points. Results: Pre‐PTA and post‐PTA IGP were significantly associated with 1‐year patency (both significance <0.01) with 0.756 and 0.791 areas under the ROC curves, respectively. The cut‐off points of pre‐PTA and post‐PTA IGP were closer to 106 and 47 mm Hg for prediction of 1‐year patency (sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.69; sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.69, respectively; 95% CI). Significant reductions in 1‐year patency were shown in the subjects with greater than the cut‐off values, either pre‐PTA or post‐PTA IGP, compared with those with smaller than these values (both log rank test < 0.001). Conclusion: IGP might be useful to evaluate procedural endpoints and predict patency outcomes in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow lesions undergoing PTA. Patients with the greater pre‐PTA or post‐PTA IGP, to some level, seem to have the shorter patency. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Chih-Cheng Wu,et al.  Cutting balloon angioplasty for resistant venous stenoses of dialysis access: Immediate and patency results , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  S. Schwab,et al.  Mathematical model demonstrates influence of luminal diameters on venous pressure surveillance. , 2007, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[3]  A. Besarab,et al.  Utility of Static Pressure Ratio Recording during Angioplasty of Arteriovenous Graft Stenosis , 2006, Seminars in dialysis.

[4]  S. Stavropoulos,et al.  Physical examination versus normalized pressure ratio for predicting outcomes of hemodialysis access interventions. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[5]  A. Westfall,et al.  Predictors of arteriovenous graft patency after radiologic intervention in hemodialysis patients. , 2001, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[6]  D. Windus,et al.  Flow in hemodialysis grafts after angioplasty: Do radiologic criteria predict success? , 2001, Kidney international.

[7]  Chun-Peng Liu,et al.  Percutaneous management of acutely thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: The double balloon occlusion technique , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  M. Oliver,et al.  Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow. , 2001, Kidney international.