Comparison of the criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests with and without limb length adjustment in Asian adults.

[1]  A. Jackson,et al.  The Relationship of the Sit and Reach Test to Criterion Measures of Hamstring and Back Flexibility in Young Females. , 1986 .

[2]  David R. Hopkins,et al.  Comparing the Sit and Reach with the Modified Sit and Reach in Measuring Flexibility in Adolescents , 1990 .

[3]  R. Shephard,et al.  On the generality of the "sit and reach" test: an analysis of flexibility data for an aging population. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[4]  J R Morrow,et al.  How "significant" is your reliability? , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  P. Patterson,et al.  The validity and reliability of the back saver sit-and-reach test in middle school girls and boys. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  P. Patterson,et al.  The validity of the modified sit-and-reach test in college-age students. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  The criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test: replication and extension of previous findings. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  Jack F. Wasserman,et al.  Criterion Related Validity of the Sit‐and‐Reach Test , 1994 .

[9]  W. Hoeger,et al.  A comparison of the sit and reach and the modified sit and reach in the measurement of flexibility in women. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  V. Wright,et al.  Measurement of back movement. , 1969, British journal of rheumatology.

[11]  J R Morrow,et al.  Relations of sit-up and sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[13]  James R. Morrow,et al.  The Rationale for the Sit and Reach Test Revisited , 1998 .