System-Level Vulnerability Assessment for EME: From Fault Tree Analysis to Bayesian Networks—Part II: Illustration to Microcontroller System

The vulnerability of microcontroller system against high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) is taken as an illustration to demonstrate the assessment methodology based on Bayesian networks (BN). The complete procedure is performed by two steps: the qualitative and the quantitative. The first step focuses on the analysis of three classes of properties, the electromagnetic environment, system function/structure, and their interactions. The primary BN model is built at the end of the first step. The second step investigates the BN nodes and branches one by one, which further implemented through two stages, i.e., the data acquisition and data fusion. The susceptibilities of devises are examined with the pulsed current injection. The responses of the transmission lines to HEMP are computed using the field-line coupling model. Comparing the probability density functions of the electromagnetic stresses and strengths produces the failure probabilities of the interface components. Through two-step analysis, the critical elements and coupling paths are identified and highlighted. After neglecting those unimportant factors, many BN nodes and branches are deleted. Thus, the complexity of assessment is reduced. By assigning the probability values to the simplified BN model, the system failure probability is calculated, which characterizes the system vulnerability against HEMP environment. The illustration validates the rationality and flexibility of the BN assessment methodology.

[1]  F. Sabath,et al.  Developments in Early-Time (E1) High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) Test Methods , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  W. A. Radasky,et al.  Progress in High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) Standardization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[3]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Networks , 2008, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[4]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[6]  M. Camp,et al.  Susceptibility of Personal Computer Systems to Fast Transient Electromagnetic Pulses , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[7]  Zhou Bi Study on EMP shielding effectiveness of wire-mesh reinforcement and reinforced-concrete , 2000 .

[8]  M. Camp,et al.  Predicting the breakdown behavior of microcontrollers under EMP/UWB impact using a statistical analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  An electromagnetic interaction modeling advisor , 1991 .

[10]  Hui Zhou,et al.  Electromagnetic susceptibility investigation of microcontroller by pulsed current injection , 2012, 2012 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM).

[11]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  From the electromagnetic pulse to high-power electromagnetics , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  J.L. ter Haseborg,et al.  Susceptibility of some electronic equipment to HPEM threats , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.