Digital Astronaut Project Biomechanical Models: Biomechanical Modeling of Squat, Single-Leg Squat and Heel Raise Exercises on the Hybrid Ultimate Lifting Kit (HULK)

The NASA Digital Astronaut Project (DAP) implements well-vetted computational models to predict and assess spaceflight health and performance risks, and to enhance countermeasure development. The DAP Musculoskeletal Modeling effort is developing computational models to inform exercise countermeasure development and to predict physical performance capabilities after a length of time in space. For example, integrated exercise device-biomechanical models can determine localized loading, which will be used as input to muscle and bone adaptation models to estimate the effectiveness of the exercise countermeasure. In addition, simulations of mission tasks can be used to estimate the astronaut's ability to perform the task after exposure to microgravity and after using various exercise countermeasures. The software package OpenSim (Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA) (Ref. 1) is being used to create the DAP biomechanical models and its built-in muscle model is the starting point for the DAP muscle model. During Exploration missions, such as those to asteroids and Mars, astronauts will be exposed to reduced gravity for extended periods. Therefore, the crew must have access to exercise countermeasures that can maintain their musculoskeletal and aerobic health. Exploration vehicles may have very limited volume and power available to accommodate such capabilities, even more so than the International Space Station (ISS). The exercise devices flown on Exploration missions must be designed to provide sufficient load during the performance of various resistance and aerobic/anaerobic exercises while meeting potential additional requirements of limited mass, volume and power. Given that it is not practical to manufacture and test (ground, analog and/or flight) all candidate devices, nor is it always possible to obtain data such as localized muscle and bone loading empirically, computational modeling can estimate the localized loading during various exercise modalities performed on a given device to help formulate exercise prescriptions and other operational considerations. With this in mind, NASA's Digital Astronaut Project (DAP) is supporting the Advanced Exercise Concepts (AEC) Project, Exercise Physiology and Countermeasures (ExPC) laboratory and NSBRI-funded researchers by developing and implementing well-validated computational models of exercises with advanced exercise device concepts. This report focuses specifically on lower-body resistance exercises performed with the Hybrid Ultimate Lifting Kit (HULK) device as a deliverable to the AEC Project.

[1]  N Zheng,et al.  Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Matthew Millard,et al.  Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  G. Grimby,et al.  Torque, work and EMG development in a heel-rise test. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Bryan L Riemann,et al.  Medial and Lateral Gastrocnemius Activation Differences During Heel-Raise Exercise with Three Different Foot Positions , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  B. Riemann,et al.  Analysis of Heel Raise Exercise with Three Foot Positions , 2011, International journal of exercise science.

[7]  Jason P Carey,et al.  Effect of Squat Depth and Barbell Load on Relative Muscular Effort in Squatting , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  Glenn S. Fleisig,et al.  Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. , 1997 .

[9]  Yasuo Kawakami,et al.  Fascicle–tendon behavior of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during ankle bending exercise at different movement frequencies , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[10]  G. Veil,et al.  FORCES ON THE LUMBAR SPINE DURING THE PARALLEL SQUAT , 1997 .

[11]  R F Escamilla,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  A Cappozzo,et al.  Lumbar spine loading during half-squat exercises. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  Loren Z F Chiu,et al.  COMPARISON OF JOINT KINETICS DURING FREE WEIGHT AND FLYWHEEL RESISTANCE EXERCISE , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Lower Limb for Analysis of Human Movement , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  B. Schoenfeld,et al.  Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  George A. Langford,et al.  Comparison of lower extremity EMG between the 2-leg squat and modified single-leg squat in female athletes. , 2010, Journal of sport rehabilitation.

[17]  Christopher M Powers,et al.  Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. , 2008, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  Makoto Sakamoto,et al.  In vivo kinematics of the extensor mechanism of the knee during deep flexion. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  Babak Bazrgari,et al.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[20]  A L Hof,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the single-leg decline squat , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[21]  Man-Ying Wang,et al.  Biomechanics of the heel-raise exercise. , 2005, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[22]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Patellofemoral joint contact forces during activities with high knee flexion , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  R. Moss,et al.  The Effect of Back Squat Depth on the EMG Activity of 4 Superficial Hip and Thigh Muscles , 2002, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[24]  O. Schmitt The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 2017 .

[25]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Force enhancement and force depression in a modified muscle model used for muscle activation prediction , 2013 .

[26]  R. Escamilla Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  D. Thelen Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  Scott K. Lynn,et al.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Regular and Counterbalanced Squat , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[29]  John W Chow,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Back and Front Squats in Healthy Trained Individuals , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[30]  K.,et al.  Effect of Knee Position on Hip and Knee Torques During the Barbell Squat , 2003, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[31]  Francesco Mastrandrea,et al.  Modelling the joint torques and loadings during squatting at the Smith machine , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[32]  S. McCaw,et al.  Stance width and bar load effects on leg muscle activity during the parallel squat. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  Rahul Goel,et al.  Modeling the benefits of an artificial gravity countermeasure coupled with exercise and vibration , 2012 .

[34]  M R Pierrynowski,et al.  Effect of load, cadence, and fatigue on tibio-femoral joint force during a half squat. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  Decker,et al.  Muscle Forces at the Hip during Squatting Exercise , 2010 .