Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited.

OBJECTIVES We provide an updated meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Project D.A.R.E. in preventing alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use among school-aged youths. METHODS We used meta-analytic techniques to create an overall effect size for D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations reported in scientific journals. RESULTS The overall weighted effect size for the included D.A.R.E. studies was extremely small (correlation coefficient = 0.011; Cohen d = 0.023; 95% confidence interval = -0.04, 0.08) and nonsignificant (z = 0.73, NS). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports previous findings indicating that D.A.R.E. is ineffective.

[1]  Michele A. Harmon Reducing the Risk of Drug Involvement Among Early Adolescents , 1993 .

[2]  D. W. Wright,et al.  Truth and DARE: Tracking Drug Education to Graduation and as Symbolic Politics , 1994 .

[3]  W. B. Hansen,et al.  An Examination of Strategies for Gaining Convergent Validity in Natural Experiments , 1995 .

[4]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[5]  D. Thombs A Retrospective Study of DARE: Substantive Effects not Detected in Undergraduates. , 2000 .

[6]  M. J. Zagumny,et al.  Does D.A.R.E. Work? An Evaluation in Rural Tennessee. , 1997 .

[7]  T K Logan,et al.  Project DARE: no effects at 10-year follow-up. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[10]  Deanna L. Wilkinson,et al.  Cops in the Classroom: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (Dare) , 1994 .

[11]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[12]  A. Reifman,et al.  Effects of Brazelton demonstrations on later parenting: a meta-analysis. , 1996, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[13]  Dennis P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Assessing the Effects of School-Based Drug Education: A Six-Year Multilevel Analysis of Project D.A.R.E. , 1998 .

[14]  William B Hansen,et al.  How all Stars Works: An Examination of Program Effects on Mediating Variables , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[15]  J. Block,et al.  Adolescent drug use and psychological health. A longitudinal inquiry. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[16]  P. Amato,et al.  Parental divorce and the well-being of children: a meta-analysis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  W. B. Hansen Pilot test results comparing the All Stars program with seventh grade D.A.R.E.: program integrity and mediating variable analysis. , 1996, Substance use & misuse.

[18]  S. Ennett,et al.  How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[19]  D. Gorman The effectiveness of DARE and other drug use prevention programs. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[20]  N. Ahmed,et al.  Impact of a Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E) program in preventing the initiation of cigarette smoking in fifth- and sixth-grade students. , 2002, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[21]  S. Ennett,et al.  Long-term evaluation of drug abuse resistance education. , 1994, Addictive behaviors.

[22]  S. Ennett,et al.  An outcome evaluation of Project DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) , 1991 .

[23]  J. Donnermeyer,et al.  Educators' Perceptions of the D.A.R.E. Program , 1997, Journal of drug education.

[24]  H. Becker,et al.  Impact Evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) , 1992, Journal of drug education.

[25]  W. B. Hansen,et al.  How D.A.R.E. Works: An Examination of Program Effects on Mediating Variables , 1997, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[26]  Jodie B. Ullman,et al.  Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) , 1996, Evaluation review.