An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use.

This brief report describes the changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in 9 elderly hearing-aid wearers over a 3-year period following the hearing-aid fitting. Objective measures of hearing-aid performance included three measures of speech recognition: (a) the Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) presented at 65 dB SPL and a +8 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), (b) the Connected Speech Test (CST) presented at 50 dB SPL in quiet, and (c) the CST presented at 65 dB SPL and a +8 dB SNR. Subjective, self-report measures of hearing-aid benefit included the Hearing Aid Performance Inventory (HAPI; B. E. Walden, M. E. Demorest, & E. L. Helper, 1984) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE; I. Ventry & B. Weinstein, 1982). Performance and benefit measures were obtained at postfit intervals of 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years using a standardized measurement protocol. Individual data were evaluated using 95% critical differences established previously for each benefit measure and applied around the scores observed at the 1-month postfit interval. Little evidence was seen for systematic improvement in aided performance or benefit, consistent with that expected from acclimatization, in any participant or for any measure of benefit.

[1]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  C W Turner,et al.  The Time Course of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[3]  R M Cox,et al.  A Review of Past Research on Changes in Hearing Aid Benefit over Time , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[4]  H Levitt,et al.  Speech reception by the hearing-impaired: methods of testing and the development of new tests. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[5]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R M Cox,et al.  Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Dana L. Wilson,et al.  Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  J. Fozard,et al.  Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B E Walden,et al.  Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Larry E Humes,et al.  Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R M Cox,et al.  Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[13]  I. M. Ventry,et al.  The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a New Tool , 1982, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Dana L. Wilson,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Hearing Aid Satisfaction and Usage in the Elderly Over a Period of One or Two Years After Hearing Aid Delivery , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[15]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[16]  L E Humes,et al.  Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  B. Weinstein,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly using two administration approaches. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.