Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

PURPOSE To measure the variation in human cone photoreceptor packing density across the retina, both within an individual and between individuals with different refractive errors. METHODS A high-resolution adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope was used to image the cones of 11 human eyes. Five subjects with emmetropia and six subjects with myopia were tested (+0.50 to -7.50 D). For each subject, four approximately 10 degrees x 1.5 degrees strips of cone images were obtained. Each strip started at the fovea and proceeded toward the periphery along the four primary meridians. The position of each cone within the sampling windows was digitized manually by the investigator. From these cone counts, the density of the cones was calculated for a set of fixed distances from the fovea at locations throughout the image. RESULTS Cone photoreceptor packing density decreased from 27,712 cells/mm(2) to 7,070 cells/mm(2) from a retinal eccentricity of 0.30 to 3.40 mm along the superior meridian in five emmetropic eyes. Cone photoreceptor packing density (cells per square millimeter) was significantly lower in myopic eyes than in emmetropic eyes. At a given location, there was considerable individual variation in cone photoreceptor packing density, although more than 20% of the variance could be accounted for by differences in axial length. CONCLUSIONS The results provide a baseline analysis of individual difference in cone photoreceptor packing density in healthy human eyes. As predicted by retinal stretching models, cone photoreceptor packing density is lower in highly myopic eyes than in emmetropic eyes.

[1]  R. Hess,et al.  Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  David A Atchison,et al.  Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  David Williams.  Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye , 1988, Vision Research.

[4]  A D Springer,et al.  Development of the primate area of high acuity, 3: Temporal relationships between pit formation, retinal elongation and cone packing , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  The role of neural and optical factors in limiting visual resolution in myopia , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[7]  Bernard Gilmartin,et al.  Posterior retinal contour in adult human anisomyopia. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  T. Mihashi,et al.  In Vivo Measurements of Cone Photoreceptor Spacing in Myopic Eyes from Images Obtained by an Adaptive Optics Fundus Camera , 2007, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  Nancy J. Coletta,et al.  Effect of myopia on visual acuity measured with laser interference fringes , 2006, Vision Research.

[10]  A D Springer,et al.  Development of the primate area of high acuity. 1. Use of finite element analysis models to identify mechanical variables affecting pit formation , 2004, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  T. Hebert,et al.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2002, Optics express.

[12]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  D. Karlin,et al.  Axial length measurements and fundus changes of the myopic eye. , 1971, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  T. Grosvenor,et al.  Role of the Axial Length/Corneal Radius Ratio in Determining the Refractive State of the Eye , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Larry N. Thibos,et al.  Retinal stretching limits peripheral visual acuity in myopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  Daniel X Hammer,et al.  Large-field-of-view, modular, stabilized, adaptive-optics-based scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  L. Thibos,et al.  Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  C Owsley,et al.  Spare the rods, save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  David A. Atchison,et al.  Neural and optical limits to visual performance in myopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[20]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Quantitative estimations of foveal and extra-foveal retinal circuitry in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Does cone positional disorder limit resolution? , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  Jessica I. Wolfing,et al.  High-resolution retinal imaging of cone-rod dystrophy. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[24]  L G Carney,et al.  Visual performance in high myopia. , 1990, Current eye research.

[25]  Adriana Fiorentini,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of myopic subjects , 1976, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Zawadzki,et al.  Simultaneous imaging of human cone mosaic with adaptive optics enhanced scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and high-speed transversal scanning optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Optics letters.

[27]  J. Jonas,et al.  Count and density of human retinal photoreceptors , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[28]  S A Burns,et al.  Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Photoreceptor degeneration and dysfunction in aging and age-related maculopathy , 2002, Ageing Research Reviews.

[30]  Habib Hamam,et al.  Objective Measurement of Optical Aberrations in Myopic Eyes , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  R. West,et al.  Measurement of Refractive Errors in Young Myopes Using the COAS Shack-Hartmann Aberrometer , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[33]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  R. Freeman,et al.  Nonoptical determinants of aniseikonia. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  A. Swaroop,et al.  High-resolution imaging with adaptive optics in patients with inherited retinal degeneration. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Visual performance in emmetropia and low myopia after correction of high-order aberrations. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[37]  T. Grosvenor,et al.  Three–Year Changes in Refraction and Its Components in Youth–Onset and Early Adult–Onset Myopia , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[38]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Altered visual sensitivity in axial high myopia: a local postreceptoral phenomenon? , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  N. Mcbrien,et al.  A biometric investigation of late onset myopic eyes , 1987, Acta ophthalmologica.

[40]  G. Meyer-Schwickerath,et al.  Biometric studies of the eyeball and retinal detachment. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  L N Thibos,et al.  Psychophysical Localization of the Human Visual Streak , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  David Williams,et al.  Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  How many ganglion cells are there to a foveal cone? , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.