Preanalytical quality improvement – an interdisciplinary journey

Abstract Since the beginning of laboratory medicine, the main focus was to provide high quality analytics. Over time the importance of the extra-analytical phases and their contribution to the overall quality became evident. However, as the initial preanalytical processes take place outside of the laboratory and mostly without its supervision, all professions participating in these process steps, from test selection to sample collection and transport, need to engage accordingly. Focusing solely on intra-laboratory processes will not be sufficient to achieve the best possible preanalytical quality. The Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has provided several recommendations, opinion papers and scientific evidence over the past years, aiming to standardize the preanalytical phase across Europe. One of its strategies to reach this goal are educational efforts. As such, the WG-PRE has organized five conferences in the past decade with the sole focus on preanalytical quality. This year’s conference mainly aims to depict the views of different professions on preanalytical processes in order to acquire common ground as basis for further improvements. This article summarizes the content of this 6th preanalytical conference.

[1]  J. Cadamuro Rise of the Machines: The Inevitable Evolution of Medicine and Medical Laboratories Intertwining with Artificial Intelligence—A Narrative Review , 2021, Diagnostics.

[2]  T. Haferlach,et al.  How artificial intelligence might disrupt diagnostics in hematology in the near future , 2021, Oncogene.

[3]  M. Plebani Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future , 2021, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[4]  E. Haschke-Becher,et al.  Effect of five different pneumatic tube carrier inserts on mechanical sample stress: a multicentre evaluation , 2021, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[5]  A. Šimundić,et al.  How to meet ISO15189:2012 pre-analytical requirements in clinical laboratories? A consensus document by the EFLM WG-PRE , 2021, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  G. Halwachs-Baumann,et al.  Implementation of pre-labelled barcode tubes and the GeT-System in a general hospital for the exact documentation of the time of venous blood sample and improvement of sample quality , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  A. Šimundić,et al.  The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  Cornelia Mrazek,et al.  Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making – A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions , 2020, Biochemia medica.

[9]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Exact time of venous blood sample collection – an unresolved issue, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[10]  F. Marty,et al.  How to Obtain a Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  N. Hu,et al.  Safety management of nasopharyngeal specimen collection from suspected cases of coronavirus disease 2019 , 2020, International Journal of Nursing Sciences.

[12]  G. Lippi,et al.  The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral outbreaks , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[13]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Potential preanalytical and analytical vulnerabilities in the laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[14]  M. Vaismoradi,et al.  Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Clinicians’ and laboratory medicine specialists’ views on laboratory demand management: a survey in nine European countries , 2020, Diagnosis.

[16]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Integrated diagnostics: the future of laboratory medicine? , 2019, Biochemia medica.

[17]  D. Flum,et al.  Integrating Formal Technology Assessment into an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Smart Innovation , 2020, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  A. Šimundić,et al.  PREDICT: a checklist for preventing preanalytical diagnostic errors in clinical trials , 2019, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[19]  European survey on preanalytical sample handling – Part 1: How do European laboratories monitor the preanalytical phase? On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) , 2019, Biochemia medica.

[20]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions , 2019, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[21]  G. Lippi,et al.  A manifesto for the future of laboratory medicine professionals. , 2019, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[22]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[23]  G. Lippi,et al.  Are laboratory tests always needed? Frequency and causes of laboratory overuse in a hospital setting. , 2018, Clinical biochemistry.

[24]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Practical recommendations for managing hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[25]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Visual assessment of hemolysis affects patient safety , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[26]  K. Grankvist,et al.  Sample transportation - an overview. , 2018, Diagnosis.

[27]  C. Snozek,et al.  Drone Transport of Chemistry and Hematology Samples Over Long Distances , 2017, American journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  A. Šimundić,et al.  A pragmatic approach to sample acceptance and rejection. , 2017, Clinical biochemistry.

[29]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Improving quality in the preanalytical phase through innovation, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[30]  G. Lippi,et al.  Inappropriateness in laboratory medicine: an elephant in the room? , 2017, Annals of translational medicine.

[31]  Standardizing in vitro diagnostics tasks in clinical trials: a call for action. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[32]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[33]  J. Cadamuro 8.2 Internal Quality Assurance for Preanalytical Phase , 2015 .

[34]  S. Kwan,et al.  Implementation of rapid cortisol during adrenal vein sampling. , 2014, Hypertension.

[35]  Julia Whelan,et al.  The Landscape of Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: A 15-Year Meta-Analysis , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Nora Nikolac,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[37]  A. Petersmann,et al.  Determination of hemolysis thresholds by the use of data loggers in pneumatic tube systems. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[38]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[39]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine , 2010, Annals of clinical biochemistry.