Detection of divergence in optical flow fields

Psychophysical thresholds for the detection of divergence (expansion and contraction) in the presence of a translational component are determined. Stimuli consist of sparse random dot patterns. Lifetime, number of dots, divergence, and translational velocity are varied over a wide range. Moreover, the two major characteristics of a divergence pattern, namely, the direction of and the velocity along the flow lines, are also varied independently. Lifetime and number of dots have only a small influence on performance. Over a wide range the detection of divergence is independent of the translational component. The results indicate that the direction of flow lines is an important, but by no means the only, characteristic in divergence detection. This provides evidence that, at least in these experiments, no use is made of a mechanism selectively sensitive for divergence.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[2]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[3]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[4]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[8]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The role of direction information in the perception of geometric optic flow components , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J F Norman,et al.  The Detectability of Geometric Structure in Rapidly Changing Optical Patterns , 1991, Perception.

[13]  T. Freeman,et al.  Human sensitivity to expanding and rotating motion: effects of complementary masking and directional structure , 1992, Vision Research.

[14]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Analysis of Motion Signals and the Nature of Processing in the Primate Visual System , 1992 .

[15]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  D. Regan.  The divergence of velocity and visual processing. , 1993, Perception.

[18]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Detection of vorticity in optical flow fields. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  M. Graziano,et al.  Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Detection of first-order structure in optic flow fields , 1996, Vision Research.

[21]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Detection of the sign of expansion as a function of field size and eccentricity , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.