Machine learning applied in maternal and fetal health: a narrative review focused on pregnancy diseases and complications

Introduction Machine learning (ML) corresponds to a wide variety of methods that use mathematics, statistics and computational science to learn from multiple variables simultaneously. By means of pattern recognition, ML methods are able to find hidden correlations and accomplish accurate predictions regarding different conditions. ML has been successfully used to solve varied problems in different areas of science, such as psychology, economics, biology and chemistry. Therefore, we wondered how far it has penetrated into the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Aim To describe the state of art regarding the use of ML in the context of pregnancy diseases and complications. Methodology Publications were searched in PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Seven subjects of interest were considered: gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, perinatal death, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, cesarean section, and fetal malformations. Current state ML has been widely applied in all the included subjects. Its uses are varied, the most common being the prediction of perinatal disorders. Other ML applications include (but are not restricted to) biomarker discovery, risk estimation, correlation assessment, pharmacological treatment prediction, drug screening, data acquisition and data extraction. Most of the reviewed articles were published in the last five years. The most employed ML methods in the field are non-linear. Except for logistic regression, linear methods are rarely used. Future challenges To improve data recording, storage and update in medical and research settings from different realities. To develop more accurate and understandable ML models using data from cutting-edge instruments. To carry out validation and impact analysis studies of currently existing high-accuracy ML models. Conclusion The use of ML in pregnancy diseases and complications is quite recent, and has increased over the last few years. The applications are varied and point not only to the diagnosis, but also to the management, treatment, and pathophysiological understanding of perinatal alterations. Facing the challenges that come with working with different types of data, the handling of increasingly large amounts of information, the development of emerging technologies, and the need of translational studies, it is expected that the use of ML continue growing in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.

[1]  F. Mcauliffe,et al.  Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: A systematic review , 2023, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Juan Araya,et al.  Evaluation of first and second trimester maternal thyroid profile on the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and post load glycemia , 2023, PloS one.

[3]  G. Cucinella,et al.  The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes—The Value of Regulatory Frameworks , 2022, Diagnostics.

[4]  S. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review , 2022 .

[5]  Juan Araya,et al.  Machine learning-based models for gestational diabetes mellitus prediction before 24-28 weeks of pregnancy: A review , 2022, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[6]  Haihua Bai,et al.  Adoption of Compound Echocardiography under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Fetal Congenial Heart Disease Screening during Gestation , 2022, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[7]  Sumaiya Nuha Mustafina,et al.  Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda , 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[8]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  First Trimester Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes—Identifying Pregnancies at Risk from as Early as 11–13 Weeks , 2022, Medicina.

[9]  Zhenming Yuan,et al.  The Prediction of Preterm Birth Using Time-Series Technology-Based Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study , 2021, JMIR medical informatics.

[10]  A. Hoberman,et al.  Reproductive and developmental safety evaluation of new pharmaceutical compounds , 2022, Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology.

[11]  L. Sobrevia,et al.  Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review , 2022, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[12]  Tanvir Alam,et al.  Contribution of Artificial Intelligence in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review , 2022, ICIMTH.

[13]  R. Brereton Chemometrics , 2018, Chemometrics and Cheminformatics in Aquatic Toxicology.

[14]  R. Kamal,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Health Records During Global Outreach: A Necessary Next Step in Measuring and Improving Quality of Care. , 2021, The Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  Álvaro Freitas Moreira,et al.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Neonatal Mortality: A Systematic Review , 2021, Neonatology.

[16]  Yan Liu,et al.  Identification of diagnostic cytosine-phosphate-guanine biomarkers in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus via epigenome-wide association study and machine learning , 2021, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[17]  A. Alshawabkeh,et al.  Maternal plasma lipids are involved in the pathogenesis of preterm birth , 2021, medRxiv.

[18]  J. Beyene,et al.  Prediction of preterm birth in nulliparous women using logistic regression and machine learning , 2021, PloS one.

[19]  Jingshang Wang,et al.  Extensive serum biomarker analysis in the prethrombotic state of recurrent spontaneous abortion , 2021, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[20]  José Manuel Amigo,et al.  Data Mining, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Chemometrics. Definitions, common points and Trends (Spoiler Alert: VALIDATE your models!) , 2021 .

[21]  Abbas Sheikhtaheri,et al.  Prediction of neonatal deaths in NICUs: development and validation of machine learning models , 2021, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[22]  R. Vullings,et al.  A dilated inception CNN-LSTM network for fetal heart rate estimation , 2021, Physiological measurement.

[23]  Zheng Xiang,et al.  Using Deep Learning in a Monocentric Study to Characterize Maternal Immune Environment for Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes in the Recurrent Reproductive Failure Patients , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[24]  Daniel Adane,et al.  Essential newborn care practice and its associated factors in Southwest Ethiopia , 2021, Archives of Public Health.

[25]  Toktam Khatibi,et al.  Proposing a machine-learning based method to predict stillbirth before and during delivery and ranking the features: nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study , 2021, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[26]  Rebecca R S Clark,et al.  Three machine learning algorithms and their utility in exploring risk factors associated with primary cesarean section in low-risk women: A methods paper. , 2021, Research in nursing & health.

[27]  Zhixia Teng,et al.  Integrated Learning: Screening Optimal Biomarkers for Identifying Preeclampsia in Placental mRNA Samples , 2021, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[28]  Debarka Sengupta,et al.  Ultrasound placental image texture analysis using artificial intelligence to predict hypertension in pregnancy , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[29]  E. Tejera,et al.  A Multi-Objective Approach for Drug Repurposing in Preeclampsia , 2021, Molecules.

[30]  Zhenming Yuan,et al.  Fetal birthweight prediction with measured data by a temporal machine learning method , 2021, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[31]  Christopher Toh,et al.  Applications of Machine Learning in Healthcare , 2021 .

[32]  Tan Yen Kheng Smart Manufacturing - When Artificial Intelligence Meets the Internet of Things , 2021 .

[33]  Mary Regina Boland,et al.  Towards deep phenotyping pregnancy: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to improve pregnancy outcomes , 2021, Briefings Bioinform..

[34]  Jianrong He,et al.  Perinatal health predictors using artificial intelligence: A review , 2021, Women's health.

[35]  2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. , 2020, Diabetes care.

[36]  N. Letourneau,et al.  Metabolic dysfunction in pregnancy: Fingerprinting the maternal metabolome using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 2020, Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism.

[37]  Qing-he Zhou,et al.  A prediction model using machine-learning algorithm for assessing intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose during cesarean section , 2020, BMC Anesthesiology.

[38]  L. Tarassenko,et al.  Toward a Multivariate Prediction Model of Pharmacological Treatment for Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Algorithm Development and Validation , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  B. Mol,et al.  Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Chinese Population via Advanced Machine Learning , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[40]  A. Ferrara,et al.  Exercise During the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risks of Abnormal Screening and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2020, Diabetes Care.

[41]  S. Quake,et al.  Multiomics Characterization of Preterm Birth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries , 2020, JAMA network open.

[42]  K. M. D. de Lima,et al.  Spectrochemical differentiation in gestational diabetes mellitus based on attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and multivariate analysis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[43]  W. Carlo,et al.  Predictive Modeling for Perinatal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings , 2020, JAMA network open.

[44]  E. C. Su,et al.  Comparison of Multivariable Logistic Regression and Other Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Prediction Studies in Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, JMIR medical informatics.

[45]  Marcelo González,et al.  Maternal thyroid profile in first and second trimester of pregnancy is correlated with gestational diabetes mellitus through machine learning. , 2020, Placenta.

[46]  E. Davis,et al.  Cesarean delivery and infant cortisol regulation , 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[47]  H. Mwambi,et al.  Prediction of perinatal death using machine learning models: a birth registry-based cohort study in northern Tanzania , 2020, BMJ Open.

[48]  Yuan Yuan,et al.  Exploring the Molecular Mechanism and Biomarker of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Based on RNA Sequencing Analysis. , 2020, Clinical laboratory.

[49]  Aramesh Rezaeian,et al.  Prediction of mortality of premature neonates using neural network and logistic regression , 2020, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[50]  C Ricciardi,et al.  Classifying the type of delivery from cardiotocographic signals: A machine learning approach , 2020, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[51]  Yi Li,et al.  Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first 19 weeks of pregnancy using machine learning techniques , 2020, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[52]  Ali Bahrami Rad,et al.  Machine Learning Methods for Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity Classification , 2020, IEEE Access.

[53]  Rik Vullings,et al.  Deep Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network for Fetal Heart Rate Extraction , 2020, 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).

[54]  W. Zheng,et al.  A new predicting model of preeclampsia based on peripheral blood test value. , 2020, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[55]  Lijue Liu,et al.  Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor , 2020, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[56]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Early prediction of preeclampsia via machine learning. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM.

[57]  E. C. Su,et al.  Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of preeclampsia: Development and external validation of a nationwide health insurance dataset of the BPJS Kesehatan in Indonesia , 2020, EBioMedicine.

[58]  Laura M. Heiser,et al.  How Machine Learning Will Transform Biomedicine , 2020, Cell.

[59]  Aki Koivu,et al.  Predicting risk of stillbirth and preterm pregnancies with machine learning , 2020, Health Information Science and Systems.

[60]  Kevin E. K. Chai,et al.  Stillbirth risk prediction using machine learning for a large cohort of births from Western Australia, 1980–2015 , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Abigail R Cartus,et al.  Machine learning as a strategy to account for dietary synergy: an illustration based on dietary intake and adverse pregnancy outcomes. , 2020, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[62]  Yingsong Wu,et al.  Whole‐Genome Promoter Profiling of Plasma DNA Exhibits Diagnostic Value for Placenta‐Origin Pregnancy Complications , 2020, Advanced science.

[63]  Hossam Faris,et al.  Intelligent system based on data mining techniques for prediction of preterm birth for women with cervical cerclage , 2020, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[64]  R. Unger,et al.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[65]  Viktor E. Krebs,et al.  Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions , 2020, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[66]  Bart Bijnens,et al.  Machine Learning in Fetal Cardiology: What to Expect , 2020, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[67]  E. Segal,et al.  Prediction of gestational diabetes based on nationwide electronic health records , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[68]  Do Yup Lee,et al.  Metabolomic biomarkers in midtrimester maternal plasma can accurately predict the development of preeclampsia , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[69]  E. C. Su,et al.  Prediction of Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Development of Machine Learning Models on a Prospective Cohort , 2019, JMIR medical informatics.

[70]  N. Roberts,et al.  Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[71]  Yefei Zhang,et al.  DeepFHR: intelligent prediction of fetal Acidemia using fetal heart rate signals based on convolutional neural network , 2019, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[72]  D. Aronoff,et al.  Machine learning on drug-specific data to predict small molecule teratogenicity , 2019, bioRxiv.

[73]  M. Bottai,et al.  Clinical risk assessment in early pregnancy for preeclampsia in nulliparous women: A population based cohort study , 2019, PloS one.

[74]  Youfei Yu,et al.  Prediction and associations of preterm birth and its subtypes with eicosanoid enzymatic pathways and inflammatory markers , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[75]  N. Shomron,et al.  Early Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Circulating MicroRNAs. , 2019, European journal of endocrinology.

[76]  Cheng Gao,et al.  Deep learning predicts extreme preterm birth from electronic health records , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[77]  Toktam Khatibi,et al.  Analysis of big data for prediction of provider-initiated preterm birth and spontaneous premature deliveries and ranking the predictive features , 2019, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[78]  Yejin Park,et al.  Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods , 2019, PloS one.

[79]  Sabine Maguire,et al.  Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature , 2019, Diagnostic and Prognostic Research.

[80]  Keling Liu,et al.  An integrative bioinformatics analysis of microarray data for identifying hub genes as diagnostic biomarkers of preeclampsia , 2019, Bioscience reports.

[81]  J. Little,et al.  A simple model to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus from 8 to 20 weeks of gestation in Chinese women , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[82]  P. Damm,et al.  Gestational diabetes mellitus , 2019, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[83]  Richard Ribon Fletcher,et al.  Application of Machine Learning to Prediction of Surgical Site Infection , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[84]  Sorin Draghici,et al.  The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study , 2019, PloS one.

[85]  K. Ngiam,et al.  Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[86]  Abrar E Al-Shaer,et al.  Exon level machine learning analyses elucidate novel candidate miRNA targets in an avian model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[87]  Javed Mostafa,et al.  Research evidence on strategies enabling integration of electronic health records in the health care systems of low- and middle-income countries: A literature review. , 2019, The International journal of health planning and management.

[88]  A. Shennan,et al.  The prediction of preterm delivery: What is new? , 2019, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[89]  I. Nowak,et al.  Towards a gamete matching platform: using immunogenetics and artificial intelligence to predict recurrent miscarriage , 2019, bioRxiv.

[90]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis , 2018, The Lancet. Global health.

[91]  Xu Yang,et al.  The Design and Implementation of Cardiotocography Signals Classification Algorithm Based on Neural Network , 2018, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[92]  M. Hod,et al.  The first-trimester of pregnancy - A window of opportunity for prediction and prevention of pregnancy complications and future life. , 2018, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[93]  Alexei Botchkarev,et al.  Performance Metrics (Error Measures) in Machine Learning Regression, Forecasting and Prognostics: Properties and Typology , 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management.

[94]  Tatjana Loncar-Turukalo,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach for an Early Prediction of Preterm Delivery , 2018, 2018 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY).

[95]  Akhan Akbulut,et al.  Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques , 2018, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[96]  H. Yasunaga,et al.  Predictive model for macrosomia using maternal parameters without sonography information , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[97]  Y. Long,et al.  CircRNA-0004904, CircRNA-0001855, and PAPP-A: Potential Novel Biomarkers for the Prediction of Preeclampsia , 2018, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry.

[98]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Points of Significance: Statistics versus machine learning , 2018, Nature Methods.

[99]  S. Hyer,et al.  Visceral fat mass as a novel risk factor for predicting gestational diabetes in obese pregnant women , 2018, Obstetric medicine.

[100]  W. Henrich,et al.  Does an Immigrant Background Affect the Indication, Incidence or Outcome of Emergency Cesarean Section? Results of the Prospective Data Collection of 111 Births , 2018, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[101]  Paul Fergus,et al.  Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[102]  M. Gilardino,et al.  The role of ultrasound technology in plastic surgery. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[103]  Classi fi cation and Diagnosis of Diabetes : Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes d 2019 , 2018 .

[104]  Yan Huawen,et al.  Automatic identifying of maternal ECG source when applying ICA in fetal ECG extraction , 2018 .

[105]  Jennifer N. Cooper,et al.  Postoperative neonatal mortality prediction using superlearning. , 2018, The Journal of surgical research.

[106]  Davide Ballabio,et al.  Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures , 2017 .

[107]  Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis,et al.  A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[108]  Nizar Bouguila,et al.  Classification of caesarean section and normal vaginal deliveries using foetal heart rate signals and advanced machine learning algorithms , 2017, Biomedical engineering online.

[109]  Shan-Shan Sun,et al.  Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[110]  S. Bergé,et al.  A new method for three-dimensional evaluation of the cranial shape and the automatic identification of craniosynostosis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. , 2017, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[111]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  A framework for analysis of linear ultrasound videos to detect fetal presentation and heartbeat , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[112]  M. Gosset,et al.  Emergency caesarean section. , 2017, Journal of visceral surgery.

[113]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Automated annotation and quantitative description of ultrasound videos of the fetal heart , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[114]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[115]  Anirban Mukherjee,et al.  A deep learning approach to fetal-ECG signal reconstruction , 2016, 2016 Twenty Second National Conference on Communication (NCC).

[116]  F. Stamatian,et al.  The usefulness of fetal Doppler evaluation in early versus late onset intrauterine growth restriction. Review of the literature. , 2016, Medical ultrasonography.

[117]  C. Mathers,et al.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. , 2016, The Lancet. Global health.

[118]  P. Brocklehurst A study of an intelligent system to support decision making in the management of labour using the cardiotocograph – the INFANT study protocol , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[119]  B. Bijnens,et al.  Fetal cardiovascular remodeling persists at 6 months in infants with intrauterine growth restriction , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[120]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[121]  Joseph Konrad,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images for computer-aided diagnosis , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[122]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[123]  O. Dekkers,et al.  HLA associations and HLA sharing in recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Human immunology.

[124]  Haralambos V. Vasiliadis,et al.  Maternal serum anti-Müllerian hormone at 11–13 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[125]  F. Park,et al.  The first trimester: prediction and prevention of the great obstetrical syndromes. , 2015, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[126]  Jamie Perin,et al.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis , 2015, The Lancet.

[127]  S. Mason,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of the neural transcriptome and alcohol interference during development , 2014, Front. Genet..

[128]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[129]  K. S. Shreedhara,et al.  Features Based IUGR Diagnosis Using Variational Level Set Method and Classification Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2014, 2014 Fifth International Conference on Signal and Image Processing.

[130]  A. Shennan,et al.  Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[131]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of fetal cardiac function , 2013, Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine.

[132]  U. Stenman,et al.  First trimester hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotrophin in serum - a marker of early-onset preeclampsia. , 2013, Placenta.

[133]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  Breaking with trends in pre-processing? , 2013 .

[134]  R. Romero,et al.  Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE): a novel method for rapid, simple, and automatic examination of the fetal heart , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[135]  O. Christiansen,et al.  New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[136]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Accurate prediction of pregnancy viability by means of a simple scoring system. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[137]  W. Gyselaers,et al.  Role of dysfunctional maternal venous hemodynamics in the pathophysiology of pre‐eclampsia: a review , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[138]  Anthony R Scialli,et al.  Thalidomide: the tragedy of birth defects and the effective treatment of disease. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[139]  H. Jernström,et al.  Emergency cesarean sections can be predicted by markers for stress, worry and sleep disturbances in first‐time mothers , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[140]  Edmond Zahedi,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[141]  Emily F Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[142]  R. Ferrell,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of HLA-G: Implications for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion , 2010, Reproductive Sciences.

[143]  Thierry Sluysmans,et al.  Congenital heart disease in 111 225 births in Belgium: birth prevalence, treatment and survival in the 21st century , 2009, Acta paediatrica.

[144]  N. Wessel,et al.  Circulatory soluble endoglin and its predictive value for preeclampsia in second-trimester pregnancies with abnormal uterine perfusion. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[145]  J. Rychik,et al.  The twin-twin transfusion syndrome: spectrum of cardiovascular abnormality and development of a cardiovascular score to assess severity of disease. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[146]  Richard G. Brereton,et al.  Applied Chemometrics for Scientists , 2007 .

[147]  N. Wessel,et al.  Predictive Value of Maternal Angiogenic Factors in Second Trimester Pregnancies With Abnormal Uterine Perfusion , 2007, Hypertension.

[148]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Robust statistics in data analysis — A review: Basic concepts , 2007 .

[149]  M. Ababneh Management of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. , 2004, Middle East journal of anaesthesiology.

[150]  G. Magenes,et al.  Identification of fetal sufferance antepartum through a multiparametric analysis and a support vector machine , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[151]  C. Lauritzen,et al.  Advances in craniosynostosis research and management. , 2004, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[152]  A. Gezer,et al.  Perinatal and maternal outcomes of fetal macrosomia. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[153]  A. Ognibene,et al.  Prediction of the Development of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Disorders in High-Risk Pregnant Women by Artificial Neural Networks , 2001, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[154]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[155]  C. Wren,et al.  Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations , 2000, Heart.

[156]  K. Wijma,et al.  Psychological impact of emergency cesarean section in comparison with elective cesarean section, instrumental and normal vaginal delivery. , 1998, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[157]  F. Gurgen,et al.  IUGR detection by ultrasonographic examinations using neural networks , 1997, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[158]  R. W. Huff,et al.  Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? , 1991 .

[159]  V. Moret-Bonillo,et al.  Foetos: an expert system for fetal assessment , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[160]  J. R. Scott Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology , 1990 .