Accelerating Policy Making 2.0: Innovation directions and research perspectives as distilled from four standout cases

Abstract People are lately re-considering the advantages of becoming once again an active part of the society, as they everyday discover new ways of connecting with each other towards common goals. This increasing change of attitude calls for new tools and methods as traditional tools for policy making have proved unable to predict and cope with most of today's pressing and persistent challenges. In this context, it is considered as of pivotal importance to study a set of representative set of modern Policy Making 2.0 best cases, in order to scout towards evidence-based future directions, policy propositions, documented results and conclusions. The purpose of the paper at hand is to provide policy makers, practitioners, as well as other interested stakeholders, with a bouquet of (mostly ICT-related) policy implications and practical recommendations that steam through an evidence based, domain-wide study, aiming at directing them towards more efficient and effective launch, steering and sustaining of Policy Making 2.0 initiatives. Early engagement of stakeholders, openness, user friendliness and agility in the whole procedure constitutes only a high level presentation of the propositions and implications derived as a result of the analysis that follows.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[2]  Lucian Voinea,et al.  1st International Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, EuroVAST@EuroVis 2010, Bordeaux, France, June 8, 2010 , 2010, EuroVAST@EuroVis.

[3]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism , 2007 .

[4]  A. Chadwick Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[5]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  P. Waddell UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning , 2002 .

[7]  Ines Mergel,et al.  The Transformational Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies on Government , 2009 .

[8]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[9]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives , 2010, DG.O.

[10]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[12]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Envisioning Digital Europe 2030: Scenarios for ICT in Future Governance and Policy Modelling , 2010 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[14]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  The Decalogue of Policy Making 2.0: Results from Analysis of Case Studies on the Impact of ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling , 2015 .

[15]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling: Research Challenges and Future Prospects in Europe , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Policy-making in a Complex World: Can Visual Analytics Help? , 2010, EuroVAST@EuroVis.

[20]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale , 2011, BMC infectious diseases.

[21]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[22]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .