Characteristics of Drivers Testing Positive for Heroin or Ecstasy in Norway

An increasing number of heroin and ecstasy seizures were recorded by the Norwegian police and customs authorities in the 1990s. The number of apprehended drivers in whom heroin and ecstasy were detected also rose in the same period (Heroin, 1991: n = 17, 1999: n = 320. Ecstasy, 1995: n = 6, 1999: n = 123). Drivers who tested positive for heroin (detected in urine as the metabolite 6-monoacetyl-morphine, 6-MAM) or ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxy-metamphetamine, MDMA, detected in blood) were characterized with regard to age distribution, drug use pattern, and earlier arrests. In 1998–1999, the police apprehended 9013 drivers on suspicion of being under the influence of drugs other than alcohol. Blood and urine samples from the drivers were sent to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Abuse and analyzed for the most commonly abused drugs. 6-MAM was detected in urine in 7% of the cases (n = 637), representing 542 different drivers (male: 85%, n = 463, female: 15%, n = 79) as some drivers were rearrested several times during the selection period. MDMA was detected in 2% of the cases (n = 190), representing 177 drivers (male: 90%, n = 160, female: 10%, n = 17). The median ages of drivers who tested positive for 6-MAM or MDMA were 32 and 24 years, respectively. Multi-drug use was very common in both groups (83% and 98% for the heroin and ecstasy group, respectively). Drivers in both groups were followed back to 1985 to detect earlier arrests for the same offence. Of the heroin group, 78% (n = 417) had earlier been arrested for drunken or drugged driving. Alcohol was the drug most frequently detected on first arrest. Of the ecstasy group, 47% (n = 83) had earlier been arrested, and amphetamine was most frequently found on first arrest.

[1]  A. Christophersen,et al.  Female drivers suspected for drunken or drugged driving. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[2]  J Pikkarainen,et al.  Drugs usage of drivers suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. A study of one week's samples in 1979 and 1993 in Finland. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[3]  A. Christophersen,et al.  The occurrence of drugged driving in Norway - Existing problems and solutions , 2000 .

[4]  J Mørland,et al.  Drugged driving, a review based on the experience in Norway. , 1997, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[5]  A. Christophersen,et al.  Rearrest rates among Norwegian drugged drivers compared with drunken drivers. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[6]  A. Christophersen,et al.  Study of rearrests for drunken driving in Norway. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[7]  A. Christophersen,et al.  Driving under the influence of drugs: an increasing problem , 1995 .

[8]  Asbjørg S. Christophersen,et al.  Domfellelse etter veitrafikkloven – kjøring under påvirkning av andre rusmidler enn alkohol , 1999 .

[9]  J S Oliver,et al.  Role of drugs and alcohol in impaired drivers and fatally injured drivers in the Strathclyde police region of Scotland, 1995-1998. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[10]  L. Goodman,et al.  The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics , 1941 .

[11]  G Ceder,et al.  Drugged driving in the Nordic countries--a comparative study between five countries. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[12]  Asbjørg S Christophersen,et al.  Drugged drivers in Norway with benzodiazepine detections. , 2002, Forensic science international.