Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies

This article reports partial results of an eight-year field study of the Top Management Teams (TMTs) of a global multidivisional financial services corporation and compares those results with large-sample work in the TMT literature. In particular, it investigates the operationalization of TMT cognitive diversity by the proxies of age, team tenure, industry experience, and functional background heterogeneity most often used in statistical work, and compares those operationalizations with cognitive diversity itself. In addition to highlighting which proxies seemed to most closely approximate cognitive diversity and why, it demonstrates the confounding impact of power on all operationalizations. A comparison of the field results with three representative studies with respect to the operationalization of the dependent variables of diversification, innovation, and performance helps to explain why previous TMT heterogeneity research has often produced inconsistent results or nonfindings. It offers some suggestions that should improve the robustness of statistical research and demonstrates the reciprocal usefulness of case and large-sample research.

[1]  Rudi K. F. Bresser,et al.  Dysfunctional Effects of Formal Planning: Two Theoretical Explanations. , 1983 .

[2]  H. Igor Ansoff,et al.  Comment on Henry Mintzberg's rethinking strategic planning , 1994 .

[3]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .

[4]  David J. Miller,et al.  Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment , 1991 .

[5]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Managerial orientations and organizational outcomes : the moderating roles of managerial discretion and power , 1988 .

[6]  J. Fredrickson,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM AGREEMENT ABOUT THE STRATEGIC DECISION PROCESS: A TEST OF SOME OF ITS DETERMINANTS AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997 .

[7]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[8]  Hema A. Krishnan,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM COMPLEMENTARITY: IS PERFORMANCE IMPROVED BY MERGING SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR TEAMS? , 1997 .

[9]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  Seeing The Big Picture: The Influence Of Industry, Diversification, And Business Strategy On Performance , 1997 .

[10]  J. Overall,et al.  Applied multivariate analysis , 1983 .

[11]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate , 1999 .

[12]  William H. Glick,et al.  The Selective Perception of Managers Revisited , 1997 .

[13]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment , 1993 .

[14]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[15]  L. Donaldson.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[16]  W. Boeker.  Strategic Change: The Influence Of Managerial Characteristics And Organizational Growth , 1997 .

[17]  John A. Pearce,et al.  The Tenuous Link Between Formal Strategic Planning and Financial Performance , 1987 .

[18]  Richard L. Priem.  Executive Judgment, Organizational Congruence, and Firm Performance , 1994 .

[19]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Strategic Planning and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of More Than Two Decades of Research , 1994 .

[20]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms , 1990 .

[21]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[22]  Richard L. Priem.  Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance , 1990 .

[23]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[24]  Rakesh B. Sambharya.  FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS AND INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGIES OF U.S. MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 1996 .

[25]  A. Murray.  Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance , 1989 .

[26]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[27]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[28]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[29]  Sara L. Keck.  Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context , 1997 .

[30]  R. Starratt.  The Drama Of Leadership , 1993 .

[31]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[32]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Rethinking strategic planning part I: Pitfalls and fallacies , 1994 .

[33]  K. Sutcliffe.  What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Management Teams , 1994 .

[34]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks : A tacit knowledge perspective , 1999 .

[35]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[36]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[37]  A. Morineau,et al.  Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis , 1984 .

[38]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[39]  Prithviraj Chattopadhyay,et al.  Determinants of Executive Beliefs: Comparing Functional Conditioning and Social Influence , 1999 .

[40]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[41]  H. Gough.  The Adjective Check List as a Personality Assessment Research Technique , 1960 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[44]  William H. Glick,et al.  Cognitive diversity among upper‐echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes , 1998 .

[45]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM STRATEGIC CONSENSUS, DEMOGRAPHIC HOMOGENEITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A REPORT OF RESOUNDING NONFINDINGS , 1996 .

[46]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[47]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[48]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[49]  Daniel E. Vetter,et al.  Replication in strategic management: scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness , 1998 .

[50]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[51]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  The effects of executives experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances , 1998 .