Measuring Value Consensus Among Teachers in Respect of Special Educational Needs

Previous educational research has argued that consensus upon values and goals among teachers within a school is a necessary condition for the successful development of provision for pupils with special educational needs. This paper describes a study designed to investigate this assertion empirically. Questionnaires were administered to a crosssection of teachers in five English secondary schools which belonged to a consortium dedicated to the development of special educational needs provision. On each of four different dimensions, teachers were asked to rank five alternatives in order of importance. The strength of consensus in the sample as a whole, and within each school, was measured using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W). A novel clustering technique was then applied, which succeeded in identifying groups of teachers who shared a stronger consensus than obtained in the whole sample or within each school. The findings suggest that other factors, such as the teacher's position in the school, amount of teaching experience, gender and type of subject taught, may be more important in the production of consensus than which school a teacher belongs to.

[1]  D. Reynolds Using School Effectiveness Knowledge for Children with Special Needs – The Problems and Possibilities , 2018, Towards Inclusive Schools?.

[2]  H. Daniels,et al.  Issues of Equity in Special Needs Education from a Gender Perspective , 2003 .

[3]  Gordon L. Porter Critical elements for inclusive schools , 2002 .

[4]  D. Skidmore Divergent discourses of learning difficulty , 1999 .

[5]  H. Daniels,et al.  Issues of equity in special needs education as seen from the perspective of gender , 1999 .

[6]  D. Skidmore Relationships between contrasting discourses of learning difficulty. , 1999 .

[7]  D. Skidmore Discourses of Learning Difficulty and the Conditions of School Development. , 1999 .

[8]  J. Filler Inclusion and School Reform: Transforming America`s Classrooms , 1999 .

[9]  D. Skidmore Pedagogical discourse and the dynamic of school development , 1998 .

[10]  L. Florian,et al.  Effective Inclusive Schools: a study in two countries , 1996 .

[11]  C. Goodey,et al.  Human Rights and School Change: The Newham Story. , 1996 .

[12]  David Reynolds,et al.  School Effectiveness and School Improvement in the United Kingdom , 1996 .

[13]  A. Dyson,et al.  The role of the special needs co‐ordinator: Poisoned chalice or crock of gold? , 1995 .

[14]  Richard A. Villa,et al.  Creating an Inclusive School. , 1995 .

[15]  Great Britain. Welsh Office,et al.  Code of practice on the identification and assessment of special educational needs , 1994 .

[16]  B. Norwich Ideological Dilemmas in Special Needs Education: practitioners' views , 1993 .

[17]  Susan Hart Tutor Differentiation. Part of the problem or part of the solution , 1992 .

[18]  S. Ball The Micro-Politics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization , 1990 .

[19]  Bruce Joyce,et al.  School Renewal as Cultural Change. , 1989 .

[20]  P. Croll,et al.  One in Five: The Assessment and Incidence of Special Educational Needs , 1985 .

[21]  W. Garms,et al.  Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children , 1980 .