Operationalising resilience to drought: Multi-layered safety for flooding applied to droughts

This paper sets out a way of thinking about how to prepare for and respond to droughts in a holistic way using a framework developed for managing floods. It shows how the multi-layered safety (MLS) approach for flood resilience can be utilised in the context of drought in a way that three layers of intervention can be distinguished for operationalising drought resilience: (1) protection against water shortage through augmentation and diversification of water supplies; (2) prevention of damage in case of water shortage through increased efficiency of water use and timely asset maintenance; (3) preparedness for future water shortages through mechanisms to reduce the use of water and adopt innovative water technologies. Application of MLS to the cities of Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney shows that recent water reforms in these cities were primarily focused on protection measures that aim to reduce the hazard source or exposure to insufficient water supplies. Prevention and preparedness measures could be considered in defining interventions that aim to further increase the drought resilience of these cities. Although further research is needed, the application suggests that MLS can be applied to the context of drought risk management. The MLS framework can be used to classify the suite of plans deployed by a city to manage future drought risks and can be considered a planning tool to identify opportunities for increasing the level of redundancy and hence resilience of the drought risk management system.

[1]  R R Brown,et al.  Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Bas Kolen,et al.  Time needed to evacuate the Netherlands in the event of large-scale flooding: strategies and consequences. , 2012, Disasters.

[3]  W Haddon,et al.  Energy Damage and the Ten Countermeasure Strategies1 , 1973, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  Terje Aven,et al.  A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  R R Brown,et al.  The water sensitive city: principles for practice. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  B. Timbal,et al.  The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society , 2013 .

[7]  F. Hoss,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of multilayered safety (meerlaagsveiligheid) in flood risk management , 2010 .

[8]  Carol Howe,et al.  Water Sensitive Cities , 2011 .

[9]  D. Wilhite,et al.  Drought as Hazard: Understanding the Natural and Social Context , 2005 .

[10]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Towards a flood risk assessment ontology - Knowledge integration into a multi-criteria risk assessment approach , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[11]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Water-sensitive urban design: Opportunities for the UK , 2013 .

[12]  Michael J. Stewardson,et al.  Adapting urban water systems to a changing climate: lessons from the millennium drought in southeast Australia. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  A. Cancelliere,et al.  COPING WITH DROUGHT RISK IN AGRICULTURE AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS: DROUGHT MANAGEMENT AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT IN THE MEDITERRANEAN , 2009 .

[14]  Berry Gersonius,et al.  Process design and management for integrated flood risk management: exploring the multi-layer safety approach for Dordrecht, The Netherlands , 2014 .

[15]  Rebekah Ruth Brown,et al.  Stormwater management in a water sensitive city : blueprint 2011 , 2011 .

[16]  C. Zevenbergen,et al.  Challenges in urban flood management: travelling across spatial and temporal scales , 2008 .

[17]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  The safety chain: A delusive concept , 2012 .

[18]  Bas Kolen,et al.  Decision-making and evacuation planning for flood risk management in the Netherlands. , 2014, Disasters.

[19]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: The case of Melbourne's stormwater management , 2013 .

[21]  Berry Gersonius,et al.  Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure , 2012, Climatic Change.

[22]  Royce A. Francis,et al.  A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Towards improved urban water governance in Adelaide, Australia , 2011 .

[24]  D. Wilhite,et al.  CHAPfER2UNDERSTANDING THE DROUGHT PHENOMENON:THE ROLE OF DEFINITIONS , 1985 .

[25]  Berry Gersonius,et al.  Taming global flood disasters. Lessons learned from Dutch experience , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[26]  N Voulvoulis,et al.  The potential of using the Ecosystem Approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Chris Zevenbergen,et al.  Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water systems , 2013 .