The load-carrying capacity of existing slab bridges is commonly calculated based on the equivalent width recommended by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Interest in the field load testing of highway bridges has increased significantly in recent years. Load capacity of a bridge based on field testing is generally greater than that determined from standard rating calculations. The main parameters affecting the equivalent width were identified using the grillage analogy method. The results suggest that edge beam size should be considered in the equivalent width calculation. A simplified equation for the equivalent width is proposed for solid slab bridges with or without edge beams. The equivalent widths based on the AASHTO and LRFD cores was compared with those based on the field tests and analyses. The equivalent widths based on the grillage analogy and field tests are higher than those based on the AASHTO and LRFD codes, which indicates that the codes give a ...
[1]
Pedro Albrecht,et al.
BEHAVIOR OF TWO-SPAN CONTINUOUS BRIDGE UNDER TRUCK AXLE LOADING. DISCUSSION
,
1993
.
[2]
Baidar Bakht,et al.
BRIDGE TESTING - A SURPRISE EVERY TIME
,
1990
.
[3]
Bryan E. Little,et al.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
,
2000
.
[4]
J. M. Stallings,et al.
Tests and Ratings of Short‐Span Steel Bridges
,
1993
.
[5]
L. Javier Malvar,et al.
LATERAL DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS IN ONE-WAY CONTINUOUS NAVY PIER DECKS
,
1993
.
[6]
Roy A. Imbsen,et al.
DISTRIBUTION OF WHEEL LOADS ON HIGHWAY BRIDGES
,
1990
.