Robust computation and parametrization of multiple view relations

A new method is presented for robustly estimating multiple view relations from image point correspondences. There are three new contributions, the first is a general purpose method of parametrizing these relations using point correspondences. The second contribution is the formulation of a common Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) for each of the multiple view relations. The parametrization facilitates a constrained optimization to obtain this MLE. The third contribution is a new robust algorithm, MLESAC, for obtaining the point correspondences. The method is general and its use is illustrated for the estimation of fundamental matrices, image to image homographies and quadratic transformations. Results are given for both synthetic and real images. It is demonstrated that the method gives results equal or superior to previous approaches.

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust regression and outlier detection , 1987 .

[3]  P. Gill,et al.  Algorithms for the Solution of the Nonlinear Least-Squares Problem , 1978 .

[4]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  3D Model Acquisition from Extended Image Sequences , 1996, ECCV.

[5]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  Estimation of Relative Camera Positions for Uncalibrated Cameras , 1992, ECCV.

[6]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Affine Calibration of Mobile Vehicles , 1995 .

[7]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  Trilinearity in Visual Recognition by Alignment , 1994, ECCV.

[8]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[9]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Theory of Reconstruction from Image Motion , 1992 .

[10]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  A Stability Analysis of the Fundamental Matrix , 1994, ECCV.

[11]  A FischlerMartin,et al.  Random sample consensus , 1981 .

[12]  O. Faugeras,et al.  On determining the fundamental matrix : analysis of different methods and experimental results , 1993 .

[13]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Maintaining multiple motion model hypotheses over many views to recover matching and structure , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[14]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig , 1992, ECCV.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Robust parameterization and computation of the trifocal tensor , 1997, Image Vis. Comput..