An Investigation of Solar Features, Test Environment, and Gender Related to Consciousness-Correlated Deviations in a Random Physical System

—Whereas a multitude of solar and geomagnetic variables were not correlated with signifi cant deviations in continuous measurements from random physical systems (Random Event Generators), these variables were moderately correlated with REG output during periods of intention. The scalar components (2–10 nT) of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field ( r = ~0.50) and global geomagnetic activity ( r = ~0.55) were signifi cantly correlated with REG deviations during the second minute of intention. Signifi cance compared with nonsuccessful deviations occurred during periods of intention when the Solar Radio Flux was about 20 units (2∙10 −21 W∙m −2 Hz −1 ) higher. The polarity of the deviation was diff erent within a Faraday (echoic) chamber than in a normal environment as well as between genders. The amount of energy associated with the increase in geomagnetic activity within the volume of human cerebrum is remarkably similar to the gravitational energy within this mass because of minute variations in G (the Gravitational Constant). These results indicate that a subset of variance shared across several components of the ambient heliogeophysical environment may be a signifi cant mediator of intention-coupled changes in random variations in p-n junction devices, and those discrete energies associated with intrinsic variations in G may be relevant.

[1]  J. M. Caswell,et al.  Simulated Effects of Sudden Increases in Electromagnetic Activity on Deviations in Random Electron Tunnelling Behaviour Associated with Cognitive Intention , 2014 .

[2]  J. M. Caswell,et al.  Cerebral Biophoton Emission as a Potential Factor in Non - Local Human - Machine Interaction , 2013 .

[3]  J. M. Caswell,et al.  Gravitational and Experimental Electromagnetic Contributions to Cerebral Effects upon Deviations from Random Number Variations Generated by Electron Tunneling , 2013, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy.

[4]  M. Persinger,et al.  Concurrent Photon Emission, Changes in Quantitative Brain Activity over the Right Hemisphere, and Alterations in the Proximal Geomagnetic Field While Imagining White Light , 2013 .

[5]  M. Ahmadlou,et al.  Brain activity of women is more fractal than men , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  G. Cornelissen,et al.  Geographically selective assortment of cycles in pandemics: meta-analysis of data collected by Chizhevsky , 2012, Epidemiology and Infection.

[7]  M. Persinger,et al.  Increased Photon Emissions from the Right But Not the Left Hemisphere While Imagining White Light in the Dark: The Potential Connection Between Consciousness and Cerebral Light , 2011 .

[8]  Y. Dan,et al.  Burst Spiking of a Single Cortical Neuron Modifies Global Brain State , 2009, Science.

[9]  Arthur R. Houweling,et al.  Behavioural report of single neuron stimulation in somatosensory cortex , 2008, Nature.

[10]  G. J. Bradish,et al.  Correlations of random binary sequences with pre-stated operator intention: a review of a 12-year program. , 2007, Explore.

[11]  B. Dunne.  Gender Differences in Human/Machine Anomalies , 2007 .

[12]  N. Pogorelov,et al.  Three-dimensional Features of the Outer Heliosphere Due to Coupling between the Interstellar and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields. I. Magnetohydrodynamic Model: Interstellar Perspective , 2004 .

[13]  C. Rodger,et al.  Ionosphere gives size of greatest solar flare , 2004 .

[14]  N. Cherry.  Schumann Resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human health effects of Solar , 2002 .

[15]  M. Persinger.  Wars and Increased Solar-Geomagnetic Activity: Aggression or Change in Intraspecies Dominance? , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  J. W. Griffee,et al.  Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer , 1998 .

[17]  G. Preti,et al.  Lunar influences on the reproductive cycle in women. , 1987, Human biology.

[18]  K. Tapping,et al.  Recent solar radio astronomy at centimeter wavelengths: The temporal variability of the 10.7‐cm flux , 1987 .

[19]  A. Hundhausen,et al.  Coronal mass ejections observed during the Solar Maximum Mission: Latitude distribution and rate of occurrence , 1984 .

[20]  D. Heath,et al.  Differences in the temporal variations of solar UV flux, 10.7-cm solar radio flux, sunspot number, and Ca-K plage data caused by solar rotation and active region evolution , 1983 .

[21]  R. Howard,et al.  Associations between coronal mass ejections and soft X-ray events , 1983 .

[22]  B. Thomas,et al.  The Parker spiral configuration of the interplanetary magnetic field between 1 and 8.5 AU , 1980 .

[23]  S. Kahler,et al.  Prompt solar proton events and coronal mass ejections , 1978 .

[24]  M. Altschuler,et al.  Solar sources of the interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind , 1977 .

[25]  J. Wilhjelm,et al.  Critical component of the interplanetary magnetic field responsible for large geomagnetic effects in the polar cap , 1972 .

[26]  W. Neupert.  COMPARISON OF SOLAR X-RAY LINE EMISSION WITH MICROWAVE EMISSION DURING FLARES. , 1968 .

[27]  D. Justin Schove,et al.  The sunspot cycle, 649 B.C. to A.D. 2000 , 1955 .

[28]  David Berghmans,et al.  From the Wolf number to the International Sunspot Index: 25 years of SIDC , 2007 .

[29]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[30]  G. Cornelissen,et al.  Essays on Chronomics Spawned by Transdisciplinary Chronobiology , 2001 .

[31]  Robert G. Jahn,et al.  Contributions to Variance in REG Experiments: ANOVA Models and Specialized Subsidiary Analyses , 2000 .

[32]  Dean Radin,et al.  Meta-analysis of mind-matter interaction experiments: 1959 to 2000 , 2000 .

[33]  M. Shea,et al.  A summary of major solar proton events , 1990 .

[34]  T. Holzer.  Interaction Between the Solar Wind and the Interstellar Medium , 1976 .