Preclinical Alternative Model for Analysis of Porous Scaffold Biocompatibility Applicable in Bone Tissue Engineering 1

Using scaffolds with appropriate porosity represents a potential approach for repair of critical-size bone defects. Vascularization is essential for bone formation and healing. This study investigates methods for monitoring angiogenesis within porous biopolymer scaffolds on the basis of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)/chitosan. We use the chick and quail chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay as an in vivo model focused on the formation of new blood vessels inside the implant structure. Chemical properties of the surface in biopolymer scaffold matrix were characterized as well as the tissue reaction of the CAM. Implantation of a piece of polymer scaffold results in vascular reaction, documented visually and by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Histological analysis shows myofibroblast reaction (smooth muscle actin-positive cells) without excessive collagen deposition. Cell invasion is observed inside the implant, and QH1 marker, detecting hemangioblasts and endothelial cells of quail origin, confirms the presence of vascular network. The CAM assay is a rapid and easy way to test biocompatibility and vasculogenic potential of new candidate scaffolds for bone tissue bioengineering with respect to the 3Rs.

[1]  M. Concha,et al.  Aerogels made of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate at high degree of neutralization: Biological properties toward wound healing. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[2]  Roman A. Perez,et al.  Nanocements produced from mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[3]  Rajeev J. Kant,et al.  Integrated approaches to spatiotemporally directing angiogenesis in host and engineered tissues. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  S. Khaleel Basha,et al.  Novel asymmetric chitosan/PVP/nanocellulose wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. , 2018, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[5]  Changsheng Liu,et al.  Enhancement of BMP-2-mediated angiogenesis and osteogenesis by 2-N,6-O-sulfated chitosan in bone regeneration. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[6]  J. Kanczler,et al.  * The Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay for Biomaterial Testing in Tissue Engineering: A Short-Term In Vivo Preclinical Model. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[7]  M. Aqil,et al.  Chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles of bevacizumab as novel drug delivery to target retina: optimization, characterization, and in vitro toxicity evaluation , 2017, Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology.

[8]  Ľ. Medvecký,et al.  In vitro and in vivo study of microporous ceramics using MC3T3 cells, CAM assay and a pig animal model , 2017, Anatomical Science International.

[9]  Julie A. Phillippi,et al.  Perivascular extracellular matrix hydrogels mimic native matrix microarchitecture and promote angiogenesis via basic fibroblast growth factor. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[10]  Feng Chen,et al.  Enhanced osteogenesis and angiogenesis by mesoporous hydroxyapatite microspheres-derived simvastatin sustained release system for superior bone regeneration , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Kunal Pal,et al.  Gelatin/Carboxymethyl chitosan based scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering applications. , 2016, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[12]  Ľ. Medvecký,et al.  Effect of enzymatic degradation of chitosan in polyhydroxybutyrate/chitosan/calcium phosphate composites on in vitro osteoblast response , 2016, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[13]  J. S. Quintans,et al.  Improvement of wound tissue repair by chitosan films containing (–)‐borneol, a bicyclic monoterpene alcohol, in rats , 2016, International wound journal.

[14]  D. Ribatti The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). A multifaceted experimental model , 2016, Mechanisms of Development.

[15]  A. Mateášik,et al.  Hypericin fluorescence kinetics in the presence of low density lipoproteins: study on quail CAM assay for topical delivery. , 2016, General physiology and biophysics.

[16]  F. Lalloué,et al.  Quantitative analysis of vascular colonisation and angio-conduction in porous silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite with various pore shapes in a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[17]  S. MacNeil,et al.  Triethyl orthoformate covalently cross-linked chitosan-(poly vinyl) alcohol based biodegradable scaffolds with heparin-binding ability for promoting neovascularisation , 2016, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[18]  Shulin Yang,et al.  HPLC detection of loss rate and cell migration of HUVECs in a proanthocyanidin cross-linked recombinant human collagen-peptide (RHC)-chitosan scaffold. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[19]  B. Hinz,et al.  Novel micropatterns mechanically control fibrotic reactions at the surface of silicone implants. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[20]  A. Heinen,et al.  Wheat Germ Agglutinin Staining as a Suitable Method for Detection and Quantification of Fibrosis in Cardiac Tissue after Myocardial Infarction , 2014, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[21]  C. Dass,et al.  The potential role of free chitosan in bone trauma and bone cancer management. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[22]  G. Finkenzeller,et al.  Evaluation of adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor-activated chitosan/hydroxyapatite scaffold for engineering vascularized bone tissue using human osteoblasts: In vitro and in vivo studies , 2014, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[23]  M. Szychlinska,et al.  New perspectives for articular cartilage repair treatment through tissue engineering: A contemporary review. , 2014, World journal of orthopedics.

[24]  L. Cheng,et al.  Fabrication of asymmetric membranes from polyhydroxybutyrate and biphasic calcium phosphate/chitosan for guided bone regeneration , 2014, Journal of Polymer Research.

[25]  Ľ. Medvecký,et al.  Properties and in vitro characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate–chitosan scaffolds prepared by modified precipitation method , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[26]  A. Aigner,et al.  A chorioallantoic membrane model for the determination of anti-angiogenic effects of imatinib. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics.

[27]  J. L. Silveira,et al.  Curcumin/xanthan-galactomannan hydrogels: rheological analysis and biocompatibility. , 2013, Carbohydrate polymers.

[28]  Aldo R. Boccaccini,et al.  Effect of nano-sized bioactive glass particles on the angiogenic properties of collagen based composites , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[29]  D. Coelho,et al.  Nanofibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/chitosan scaffolds for skin regeneration. , 2012, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[30]  L. Chan,et al.  The chick chorioallantoic membrane imaging method as a platform to evaluate vasoactivity and assess irritancy of compounds , 2012, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[31]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane for in vivo investigation of tissue-engineered construct biocompatibility. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[32]  Lie Ma,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) knitted mesh-reinforced collagen-chitosan hybrid scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[33]  Shuguang Zhang,et al.  In vivo studies on angiogenic activity of two designer self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels in the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[34]  Benjamin M Wu,et al.  Delivery of VEGF using collagen-coated polycaprolactone scaffolds stimulates angiogenesis. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  T. Segura,et al.  The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) presentation within fibrin matrices on endothelial cell branching. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[36]  V. Melenovský,et al.  Myocardial Morphological Characteristics and Proarrhythmic Substrate in the Rat Model of Heart Failure Due to Chronic Volume Overload , 2011, Anatomical record.

[37]  D. Kuraitis,et al.  A collagen–chitosan hydrogel for endothelial differentiation and angiogenesis. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[38]  J. D. de Bruijn,et al.  Chitosan‐based hydrogels do not induce angiogenesis , 2009, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[39]  H. Rashidi,et al.  The chick embryo: hatching a model for contemporary biomedical research , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  G. Finkenzeller,et al.  In vivo engineering of a human vasculature for bone tissue engineering applications , 2008, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[41]  T. McQuinn,et al.  Embryogenesis of the heart muscle. , 2008, Heart failure clinics.

[42]  David Sedmera,et al.  High‐frequency ultrasonographic imaging of avian cardiovascular development , 2007, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[43]  B Kenny,et al.  Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) composite biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro performance assessed by osteoblast proliferation, osteoclast adhesion and resorption, and macrophage proinflammatory response. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[44]  D. Stocum,et al.  Regenerative biology and medicine. , 2006, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[45]  Qiong Wu,et al.  Effect of composition of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) on growth of fibroblast and osteoblast. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[46]  C. Drake,et al.  VEGF directs newly gastrulated mesoderm to the endothelial lineage. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[47]  U. Losert,et al.  The Mandatory CAM Testing of Cells and Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Benefits for the Three Rs of Cooperation with the Vaccine Industry , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[48]  G. Koh,et al.  Suppression of angiogenesis by the plant alkaloid, sanguinarine. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[49]  R. Bretzel,et al.  Polymers for Induction of Revascularization in the Rat Fascial Flap: Application of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Pancreatic Islet Cells , 2003, Cell transplantation.

[50]  G. Stark,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis model for tissue engineering: a new twist on a classic model. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[51]  S. J. Hazel A novel early chorioallantoic membrane assay demonstrates quantitative and qualitative changes caused by antiangiogenic substances. , 2003, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[52]  F. Moussy,et al.  The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[53]  E. Chavakis,et al.  Regulation of Endothelial Cell Survival and Apoptosis During Angiogenesis , 2002, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[54]  S A Tschanz,et al.  Intussusceptive angiogenesis: its role in embryonic vascular network formation. , 2000, Circulation research.

[55]  S. Brandt,et al.  TAL1/SCL is expressed in endothelial progenitor cells/angioblasts and defines a dorsal-to-ventral gradient of vasculogenesis. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[56]  A Vacca,et al.  The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model for in vivo research on angiogenesis. , 1996, The International journal of developmental biology.

[57]  T H Adair,et al.  Morphometric measurements of chorioallantoic membrane vascularity: effects of hypoxia and hyperoxia. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[58]  R. Muzzarelli,et al.  Biological activity of chitosan: ultrastructural study. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[59]  F. Dieterlen‐Lièvre,et al.  Vasculogenesis in the early quail blastodisc as studied with a monoclonal antibody recognizing endothelial cells. , 1987, Development.

[60]  R. Brentani,et al.  Picrosirius staining plus polarization microscopy, a specific method for collagen detection in tissue sections , 1979, The Histochemical Journal.

[61]  R. Langer,et al.  Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules , 1976, Nature.

[62]  Kai Jin,et al.  A biomimetic collagen/heparin multi-layered porous hydroxyapatite orbital implant for in vivo vascularization studies on the chicken chorioallantoic membrane , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[63]  A. E. Patil,et al.  ANGIOSTATIC PROPERTY OF CHITOSAN ACETATE IN THE CHICK CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE (CAM), IN OVO , 2014 .

[64]  Marco Presta,et al.  The gelatin sponge–chorioallantoic membrane assay , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[65]  M. Klagsbrun,et al.  Molecular angiogenesis. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[66]  C. B. Brown,et al.  Antibodies directed against the chicken type II TGFbeta receptor identify endothelial cells in the developing chicken and quail. , 1999, Developmental Dynamics.

[67]  M. Sefton,et al.  Tissue engineering. , 1998, Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[68]  Pamela J. Hines,et al.  Repair and Regeneration. , 2017, Science.