Self and organization: Knowledge work and fragmentation

A normative hurdle needs to be taken of moving beyond claims that relationship(s) of exploitation (neo‐Marxism) and bureaucracy (neo‐Weberian) are determinate, and that there is nothing new under the sun. Descriptive research is needed into what is new in the knowledge work economy/society. New relationships between self and organization demand the rethinking of logocentricism. In knowledge work, management by content mobilizes the self via individualist and creative work. An organizational (epistemic) regime emerges where the claim on the self is total. Ethnographic research has revealed self/organization identification, wherein the identification of the two leads via divergence and conflict to (organizational) fragmentation. Kunda has shown that self/organization identification can endanger the self through burn‐out and an unhealthy fixation on work. Establishes that identification between self and organization can endanger necessary boundary objects threatening requisite meanings and structures.

[1]  Barbara Ettorre,et al.  On the future of work and an end to the “century of the organization” , 1996 .

[2]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[3]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Power and influence of the human resources function through boundary spanning and information management , 1998 .

[4]  Anna Pollert,et al.  Farewell to flexibility , 1992 .

[5]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Prepare your organization to fight fires , 1996 .

[6]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[7]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The Social Life of Documents , 1996, First Monday.

[8]  K. Legge.  Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[9]  Barbara Townley,et al.  FOUCAULT, POWER/KNOWLEDGE, AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[10]  K. Weick.  Drop Your Tools: An Allegory for Organizational Studies. , 1996 .

[11]  D. Meyerson,et al.  CULTURAL CHANGE: AN INTEGRATION OF THREE DIFFERENT VIEWS[1] , 1987 .

[12]  M. Castro,et al.  Studies on the prolactin-releasing mechanism of histones H2A and H2B. , 2000, Life sciences.

[13]  K. Legge.  The Morality of HRM , 1998 .

[14]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen , 1995 .

[15]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Human Resource Management: An Agenda for the 1990's , 1990 .

[16]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  On the Popularity of Organizational Culture , 1990 .

[17]  John Storey.  Developments in the Management of Human Resources , 1988 .

[18]  W. Bridges.  Jobshift: How To Prosper In A Workplace Without Jobs , 1994 .

[19]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[20]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The Social Life of Documents , 1996, First Monday.

[21]  H. Willmott.  STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS* , 1993 .

[22]  Michael Ivor Reed,et al.  Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis , 2001 .

[23]  M. Reed.  From the cage to the gaze? The dynamics of organisational control in late modernity , 1999 .

[24]  Z. Bauman.  Intimations of postmodernity , 1991 .

[25]  Empowerment through Quality Management: Employee Accounts from inside a Bank, a Hotel and two Factories , 1998 .

[26]  C. Handy.  The empty Raincoat : Making sense of the Future , 1994 .

[27]  T. Keenoy,et al.  Review Article Human resource management: rhetoric, reality and contradiction , 1990 .

[28]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  Change at Work , 1997 .

[29]  K. Weick.  The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster , 1990 .

[30]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  Corporate Strategy and Corporate Culture: The View from the Checkout , 1990 .

[31]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).