Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries

Abstract A carbon tax is one of economic policy instruments of environmental protection supposed to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A functional carbon tax aims at incorporating costs for elimination of environmental harm into the pricing decisions. In terms of global climate change, the carbon tax is usually imposed on the production, distribution or consumption of carbon-content fossil fuels. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the carbon tax environmental effectiveness in the energy industries of selected EU countries, namely Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland and Slovenia. To achieve the principal research objective, the multiple panel regression method for the selected variables was used, the synergy of other environmental policy tools being taken into account. Control variables employed were emission allowance price, household final consumption expenditure, corporate investments, solid fuel consumption and renewable energy consumption. The analysis results suggest that the carbon tax in the energy industry is environmentally efficient, an increased tax rate allowing to reduce GHG production, which is statistically significantly affected by the consumption of fossil fuels. Based on the estimated partial regression coefficient (−0.01158), raising the carbon tax by one euro per tonne can cut annual per capita emissions by 11.58 kg.

[1]  Eskinder Demisse Gemechu,et al.  Economic and environmental effects of CO2 taxation: an input-output analysis for Spain , 2014 .

[2]  Tom-Reiel Heggedal,et al.  Environmental Policy and the Direction of Technical Change , 2018, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

[3]  A. Baranzini,et al.  A future for carbon taxes , 2000 .

[4]  N. Apergis,et al.  Population and lifestyle trend changes in China: implications for environmental quality , 2016 .

[5]  K. Nagel,et al.  Mind the price gap: How optimal emission pricing relates to the EU CO2 reduction targets , 2018, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.

[6]  Y. Hao,et al.  The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China , 2017 .

[7]  The structure of the climate debate , 2016, 1608.05597.

[8]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  To Explain or To Predict? , 2010, 1101.0891.

[9]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[10]  Shi Min-jun,et al.  Carbon tax,cap-and-trade or mixed policy:Which is better for carbon mitigation? , 2013 .

[11]  A. Baranzini,et al.  Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable? , 2017, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[12]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Economic incentives for environmental protection: Integrating theory and practice , 1992 .

[13]  J. Poterba,et al.  Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax , 1991 .

[14]  Yingying Zeng Indirect double regulation and the carbon ETSs linking: The case of coal-fired generation in the EU and China , 2017 .

[15]  A. Pereira,et al.  Environmental Fiscal Reform and Fiscal Consolidation , 2014 .

[16]  Yves Croissant,et al.  Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package , 2008 .

[17]  H. Vollebergh,et al.  Carbon Pricing in the EU: Evaluation of Different EU ETS Reform Options , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  S. Speck Energy and carbon taxes and their distributional implications , 1999 .

[19]  Lei Jin,et al.  The Impact of Technological Progress in the Energy Sector on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis from China , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  George Halkos,et al.  Measuring the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiency in CO2 emissions: an application of conditional full frontiers , 2014 .

[21]  L. Goulder,et al.  Climate change policy's interactions with the tax system☆ , 2013 .

[22]  Other Instrument mixes for environmental policy , 2007 .

[23]  R. Begum,et al.  Dynamic impact of household consumption on its CO2 emissions in Malaysia , 2015, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[24]  Xueli Zhao,et al.  Consumption‐Based Accounting of Global Anthropogenic CH4 Emissions , 2018, Earth's Future.

[25]  W. Nordhaus The architecture of climate economics: Designing a global agreement on global warming , 2011 .

[26]  Heinrich R. Bohlmann,et al.  The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: A dynamic CGE modelling approach , 2016 .

[27]  H. Jacobsen,et al.  Are CO2 taxes regressive? Evidence from the Danish experience , 2005 .

[28]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions , 2000 .

[29]  S. Silveira,et al.  Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector , 2018, Energy Policy.

[30]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[31]  Benoît Bosquet,et al.  Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence , 2000 .

[32]  R. Duarte,et al.  The impact of household consumption patterns on emissions in Spain , 2010 .

[33]  S. Solaymani Carbon and energy taxes in a small and open country , 2017 .

[34]  Jari Kaivo-oja,et al.  Environmental taxes on fuels and electricity -- some experiences from the Nordic countries , 1999 .

[35]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[36]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  What You Can and Can’t Properly Do with Regression , 2010 .

[37]  M. Greaker,et al.  Emission Trading with Fiscal Externalities: The Case for a Common Carbon Tax for the Non-ETS Emissions in the EU , 2018 .

[38]  E. Mansur Prices versus quantities: environmental regulation and imperfect competition , 2013, Journal of Regulatory Economics.