Hemifield Effects in Multiple Identity Tracking

In everyday life, we often need to attentively track moving objects. A previous study has claimed that this tracking occurs independently in the left and right visual hemifields (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2005, Psychological Science,16, 637–647). Specifically, it was shown that observers were much more accurate at tracking objects that were spread over both visual hemifields as opposed to when all were confined to a single visual hemifield. In that study, observers were not required to remember the identities of the objects. Conversely, in real life, there is seldom any benefit to tracking an object unless you can also recall its identity. It has been predicted that when observers are required to remember the identities of the tracked objects a bilateral advantage should no longer be observed (Oksama & Hyönä, 2008, Cognitive Psychology, 56, 237–283). We tested this prediction and found that a bilateral advantage still occurred, though it was not as strong as when observers were not required to remember the identities of the targets. Even in the later case we found that tracking was not completely independent in the two visual hemifields. We present a combined model of multiple object tracking and multiple identity tracking that can explain our data.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[7]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[8]  D H Hubel,et al.  Brain mechanisms of vision. , 1979, Scientific American.

[9]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher‐order cognition? An individual difference approach , 2004 .

[10]  P McGeorge,et al.  Multiple-object tracking: the binding of spatial location and featural identity. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[11]  R. Allen,et al.  Attention and expertise in multiple target tracking , 2004 .

[12]  A. Treisman.  The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  Attention: Selective Attention and Consciousness , 2009 .

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  A. Holcombe,et al.  Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object , 2012, Cognition.

[16]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  The Role of the Parietal Lobe in Visual Extinction Studied with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Don Dedrick,et al.  Computation, Cognition, and Pylyshyn , 2009 .

[18]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  B. Scholl.  What Have We Learned about Attention from Multiple-Object Tracking (and Vice Versa)? , 2009 .

[20]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Tracking unique objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. , 1994 .

[24]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[25]  D. Somers,et al.  Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[26]  Todd S Horowitz,et al.  The what–where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[30]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  P. Howe,et al.  The more often you see an object, the easier it becomes to track it. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[34]  Peter McGeorge,et al.  Multiple-object tracking: enhanced visuospatial representations as a result of experience. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[35]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[36]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[37]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity , 2010, Psychological science.

[38]  Jean-François Delvenne,et al.  The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields , 2005, Cognition.