Advances and applications of binding affinity prediction methods in drug discovery.

Nowadays, the improvement of R&D productivity is the primary commitment in pharmaceutical research, both in big pharma and smaller biotech companies. To reduce costs, to speed up the discovery process and to increase the chance of success, advanced methods of rational drug design are very helpful, as demonstrated by several successful applications. Among these, computational methods able to predict the binding affinity of small molecules to specific biological targets are of special interest because they can accelerate the discovery of new hit compounds. Here we provide an overview of the most widely used methods in the field of binding affinity prediction, as well as of our own work in developing BEAR, an innovative methodology specifically devised to overtake some limitations in existing approaches. The BEAR method was successfully validated against different biological targets, and proved its efficacy in retrieving active compounds from virtual screening campaigns. The results obtained so far indicate that BEAR may become a leading tool in the drug discovery pipeline. We primarily discuss advantages and drawbacks of each technique and show relevant examples and applications in drug discovery.

[1]  J. Irwin,et al.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Julien Michel,et al.  Protein-ligand binding affinity predictions by implicit solvent simulations: a tool for lead optimization? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  R. Kroemer Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.

[5]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[6]  Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Calculation of solvation and binding free energy differences between VX-478 and its analogs by free energy perturbation and AMSOL methods , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Grid computing in large pharmaceutical molecular modeling. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[8]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Nicolas Foloppe,et al.  Rigorous Free Energy Calculations in Structure‐Based Drug Design , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[10]  B. Kuhn,et al.  Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Urban Bren,et al.  Free energy simulations of uncatalyzed DNA replication fidelity: structure and stability of T.G and dTTP.G terminal DNA mismatches flanked by a single dangling nucleotide. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Piotr Cieplak,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free energy analyses of cathepsin D-inhibitor interactions: insight into structure-based ligand design. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  William Seibel,et al.  Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: a beaten field? , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Steven W. Muchmore,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using a High-Throughput Version of MM-PBSA , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  Steven W. Muchmore,et al.  High-Throughput Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities: Modification and Adaptation of the MM-PBSA Protocol to Enterprise Grid Computing , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  M. Erion,et al.  Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  U. Ryde,et al.  Ligand affinities predicted with the MM/PBSA method: dependence on the simulation method and the force field. , 2006, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[19]  David A Pearlman,et al.  Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  B. Dominy Molecular recognition and binding free energy calculations in drug development. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[22]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Absolute binding free energy calculations: On the accuracy of computational scoring of protein–ligand interactions , 2010, Proteins.

[23]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[24]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Jeremy R. H. Tame Scoring Functions – the First 100 Years , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[26]  Maria A Miteva,et al.  Structure-based virtual ligand screening: recent success stories. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[27]  P. Pascutti,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations applied to the study of subtypes of HIV-1 protease common to Brazil, Africa, and Asia , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[28]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  G. Klebe,et al.  Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  WISDOM-II: Screening against multiple targets implicated in malaria using computational grid infrastructures , 2009, Malaria Journal.

[31]  Thomas Steinbrecher,et al.  A multistep approach to structure-based drug design: studying ligand binding at the human neutrophil elastase. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  Pascal Bonnet,et al.  Scoring binding affinity of multiple ligands using implicit solvent and a single molecular dynamics trajectory: application to influenza neuraminidase. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[33]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[34]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[35]  Scott P. Brown,et al.  Large-scale application of high-throughput molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area for routine physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Niu Huang,et al.  Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[37]  M L Lamb,et al.  Prediction of binding affinities for TIBO inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using Monte Carlo simulations in a linear response method. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Free energies of binding of polychlorinated biphenyls to the estrogen receptor from a single simulation , 2003, Proteins.

[39]  Martin Almlöf,et al.  Probing the effect of point mutations at protein-protein interfaces with free energy calculations. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Robert M. Rydzewski,et al.  Real World Drug Discovery: A Chemist's Guide to Biotech and Pharmaceutical Research , 2008 .

[41]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[42]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  BEAR, a Novel Virtual Screening Methodology for Drug Discovery , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[43]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[44]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  A computational workflow for the design of irreversible inhibitors of protein kinases , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[45]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM‐PBSA and MM‐GBSA , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  Walter Filgueira de Azevedo,et al.  Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity. , 2008, Current drug targets.

[47]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Computational inhibitor design against malaria plasmepsins , 2007, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[48]  P A Kollman,et al.  What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? , 1999, Proteins.

[49]  P. Kollman,et al.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[51]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Hierarchical database screenings for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using a pharmacophore model, rigid docking, solvation docking, and MM-PB/SA. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[52]  Vincent Breton,et al.  Design and Discovery of Plasmepsin II Inhibitors Using an Automated Workflow on Large‐Scale Grids , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[53]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  Are Automated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Binding Free Energy Calculations Realistic Tools in Lead Optimization? An Evaluation of the Linear Interaction Energy (LIE) Method , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[54]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors. , 2007, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[55]  G. Degliesposti,et al.  Binding Estimation after Refinement, a New Automated Procedure for the Refinement and Rescoring of Docked Ligands in Virtual Screening , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.

[56]  William L Jorgensen,et al.  Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.