Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra‐ and inter‐laboratory evaluations

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for the prospective identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. Proliferative responses induced in lymph nodes draining the site of topical application of the test chemical are measured and those chemicals that induce a stimulation index of three or more compared with concurrent vehicle‐treated controls are considered to have the potential to cause skin sensitization. Dose–response data from the LLNA may be used to derive an estimate of relative skin sensitizing potency, based upon derivation of the concentration of chemical required to cause a stimulation index of 3 (EC3 value) as calculated by linear interpolation. The purpose of the present investigations was to examine the stability of LLNA responses and the consistency of derived EC3 values induced by the contact allergen paraphenylenediamine (PPD). Analyses were conducted once a month over a 4‐month period in each of two independent laboratories. In all assays, and in both laboratories, PPD elicited a positive response. Although some minor differences in responses between and within laboratories were observed, the derived EC3 values were generally very consistent. In Laboratory 1, EC3 values varied between 0.06 and 0.09% PPD, whereas in Laboratory 2 the range was 0.09–0.20%. These EC3 values are consistent with clinical experience of this material insofar as it is a common and relatively potent cause of allergic contact dermatitis in humans. Taken together, these data confirm the stability of LLNA responses both with time and between laboratories and provide additional support for the use of derived EC3 values in the assessment of relative skin sensitizing potency.

[1]  D A Basketter,et al.  Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[2]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[4]  D. Basketter,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of the Local Lymph Node Assay with 25 Chemicals and Comparison with Guinea Pig Test Data , 1991 .

[5]  J Hilton,et al.  An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. , 1995, Toxicology.

[6]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[7]  D. Basketter,et al.  Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays. , 1993, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[8]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  D. Basketter,et al.  The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. , 1994, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. , 1994, Toxicology.

[11]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[12]  T. Gray,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[13]  I. Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: Results of a final inter‐laboratory validation under field conditions , 1992, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[14]  J Hilton,et al.  Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation. , 1998, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[15]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde , 1998, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[16]  I Kimber,et al.  Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitizing potential. , 1991, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[17]  I. Kimber,et al.  Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: Comparisons with the buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs , 1990, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.