Factors affecting the measurement of roughness factor of surfaces and its implications for wetting studies

Abstract Roughness factor is widely used for topography characterization of surfaces. The measurement of meaningful values of roughness factor depends on the instrument settings, e.g. spatial resolution and scan-size, the instrument characteristics (voxel dimensions), the post-treatment of discrete data array (tessellation algorithm), and finally the nature of the surface texture (e.g. fractal). To analyze the influence of all these parameters on the value of roughness factor and evaluate the influence of each parameter, different synthetic (mathematically defined) surfaces and acid-etched/passivated titanium surfaces were used. The titanium surface topographies were studied using two different microscopes: white light confocal microscopy (WLCM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). In decreasing order of influence, roughness factor values are sensitive to the specific surface nature (fractal or non-fractal), the spatial resolution, the scan-size and the tessellation algorithm, whereas the instrumentation does not seem to be an important parameter in this study. The effect of the variability in the roughness factor depending on the above parameters in interpretation of the Young's contact angle and solid–vapor interfacial energy was studied based on the apparent contact angle observed and the Wenzel's equation. It was found that depending on how roughness factor is measured variations up to 20% in the Young's contact angle or solid–vapor interfacial energy may be found.

[1]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[2]  R. Hidalgo-Álvarez,et al.  Contact angle measurements on two (wood and stone) non-ideal surfaces , 2002 .

[3]  P. Gennes Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[4]  W. Possart,et al.  Wetting and scanning force microscopy on rough polymer surfaces: Wenzel’s roughness factor and the thermodynamic contact angle , 2003 .

[5]  Eugene A. Irene,et al.  Area evaluation of microscopically rough surfaces , 1999 .

[6]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[7]  Hassan Zahouani,et al.  Effect of lateral resolution on topographical images and three-dimensional functional parameters , 1998 .

[8]  T S Chow,et al.  Nanoscale surface roughness and particle adhesion on structured substrates , 2007 .

[9]  Sung Joon Ahn,et al.  Least Squares Orthogonal Distance Fitting of Curves and Surfaces in Space , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  F Rupp,et al.  Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[11]  G. Franceschetti,et al.  Scattering from natural rough surfaces modeled by fractional Brownian motion two-dimensional processes , 1999 .

[12]  G. Carter,et al.  TOPICAL REVIEW: The physics and applications of ion beam erosion , 2001 .

[13]  J. Coninck,et al.  Influence of Surface Roughness on Wetting Dynamics , 1999 .

[14]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications , 1968 .

[15]  Dongqing Li,et al.  A reformulation of the equation of state for interfacial tensions , 1990 .

[16]  B. Muralikrishnan,et al.  Recent advances in separation of roughness, waviness and form , 2002 .

[17]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Dependence of the surface fractal dimension of soil pores on image resolution and magnification , 2003 .

[18]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Vapour adsorption and contact angles on hydrophobic solid surfaces , 1993 .

[19]  Suet To,et al.  A novel robust Gaussian filtering method for the characterization of surface generation in ultra-precision machining , 2006 .

[20]  Rajpal S. Sirohi,et al.  Characterization of surface topography by confocal microscopy: II. The micro and macro surface irregularities , 2000 .

[21]  B N J Persson,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[22]  J. Molinari,et al.  Finite-element analysis of contact between elastic self-affine surfaces. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Microtextured superhydrophobic surfaces: a thermodynamic analysis. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[24]  S. Borini,et al.  AFM analysis of MgB2 films and nanostructures , 2007 .

[25]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler , 1995 .

[26]  Sung Joon Ahn,et al.  Least Squares Orthogonal Distance Fitting of Implicit Curves and Surfaces , 2001, DAGM-Symposium.

[27]  Manfredo P. do Carmo,et al.  Differential geometry of curves and surfaces , 1976 .

[28]  A. Fujishima,et al.  Effects of the Surface Roughness on Sliding Angles of Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Surfaces , 2000 .

[29]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Effect of scan size and surface roughness on microscale friction measurements , 1997 .

[30]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Status of the three-phase line tension: a review. , 2004, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[31]  Dongqing Li,et al.  EQUATION OF STATE FOR INTERFACIAL TENSIONS OF SOLID-LIQUID SYSTEMS , 1992 .

[33]  M. Smid,et al.  On the influence of imaging conditions and algorithms on the quantification of surface topography , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[34]  A Amirfazli,et al.  A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for superhydrophobic surfaces. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[35]  J. Feder,et al.  The Fractal Characterization of Rough Surfaces , 1992 .

[36]  Meenakshisundaram Gopi,et al.  Surface Reconstruction based on Lower Dimensional Localized Delaunay Triangulation , 2000, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[37]  Y. Bruynseraede,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy observation of self-affine fractal roughness in ion-bombarded film surfaces. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[38]  T. Chow Nanoadhesion between rough surfaces. , 2001, Physical Review Letters.

[39]  I. Ford Roughness effect on friction for multi-asperity contact between surfaces , 1993 .

[40]  Claude Martelet,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour , 2003 .

[41]  David Quéré,et al.  Rough ideas on wetting , 2002 .

[42]  Carlos Nelson Elias,et al.  Atomic force microscopy analysis of different surface treatments of Ti dental implant surfaces , 2004 .