Sex and Laterality Differences in Medullary Humerus Morphology

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) prosthetic limb attachment holds promise for transhumeral amputees. Understanding humeral medullary morphology is necessary for informed design of upper extremity OI systems, and is beneficial to the field of megaprosthetic reconstruction of the distal humerus where diaphyseal fixation is desired. The purpose of this study was to quantify the sex and laterality differences in humerus morphology, specifically over the diaphysis. Three‐dimensional surface reconstructions of 58 pairs of cadaveric humeri (43 male, 15 female) were generated from CT data. Measures describing periosteal and medullary morphology were collected relative to an anatomic coordinate system. Sex and laterality differences in biomechanical length (BML) were observed (P ≤ 0.001 and 0.022, respectively). Head radius was larger in males than females (P ≤ 0.001). Retroversion was increased in right humeri relative to left (P ≤ 0.001). Canal orientation exhibited a conformational shift from anteversion to retroversion distally at approximately 65% BML. Right humeri exhibited larger medullary diameters than left in the 1st and 2nd principal directions (P ≤ 0.024). Males displayed larger diameter medullary canals proximally (P ≤ 0.029) and an increased rate of divergence of the endosteal cortex in the proximal diaphysis (P ≤ 0.009). Females exhibited higher canal aspect ratios at mid‐shaft (P ≤ 0.014) and lower mean cortical thickness (P ≤ 0.001). Human humeral diaphysis morphology exhibits sex and laterality differences, which are dependent on position along the diaphysis. Understanding humeral morphology is necessary to achieve adequate primary stability and bone apposition in design of endoprosthetic stems for percutaneous OI implants, and distal humerus replacement. Anat Rec, 302:1709–1717, 2019. © 2019 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association for Anatomy

[1]  Heath B. Henninger,et al.  Transhumeral loading during advanced upper extremity activities of daily living , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  R. Schuh,et al.  Modular prosthetic reconstruction of major bone defects of the distal end of the humerus. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Morphologic analysis of the distal humerus with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  W H Harris,et al.  Quantification of Implant Micromotion, Strain Shielding, and Bone Resorption With Porous‐Coated Anatomic Medullary Locking Femoral Prostheses , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[6]  A. Khemka,et al.  Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Suva,et al.  Relationship of bicipital groove rotation with humeral head retroversion: a three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  K. Wilk,et al.  Humeral Retroversion and Its Relationship to Glenohumeral Rotation in the Shoulder of College Baseball Players , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Kent N Bachus,et al.  Percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for amputees: Limb compensation in a 12-month ovine model. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  John Fergason,et al.  Comparison of satisfaction with current prosthetic care in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts with major traumatic limb loss. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[13]  T. Lang,et al.  Adaptation of the Proximal Femur to Skeletal Reloading After Long‐Duration Spaceflight , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  B. Molitoris,et al.  A statistical method for determining the breakpoint of two lines. , 1984, Analytical biochemistry.

[15]  G. Blunn,et al.  Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus following resection of bone tumours. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  Stephen D. Fening,et al.  Predictive anthropometric measurements for humeral head curvature. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  M. Pearl,et al.  Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. , 1996, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  R. Grimer,et al.  The results of endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the distal humerus. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  G. Farfalli,et al.  Early Equivalence of Uncemented Press-fit and Compress® Femoral Fixation , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  C. Dujardin,et al.  A study of reproducibility of an original method of CT measurement of the lateralization of the intertubercular groove and humeral retroversion , 2003, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[22]  K. Wilk,et al.  Osseous Adaptation and Range of Motion at the Glenohumeral Joint in Professional Baseball Pitchers * , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  James A. Johnson,et al.  An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[24]  Michael J Bey,et al.  Accuracy and feasibility of dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to quantify in vivo hip kinematics during clinical exams. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[25]  J. P. Beck,et al.  Progression of Bone Ingrowth and Attachment Strength for Stability of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prostheses , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  J. Dequeker Periosteal and endosteal surface remodeling in pathologic conditions. , 1971, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Rickard Brånemark,et al.  Osseointegration amputation prostheses on the upper limbs: methods, prosthetics and rehabilitation , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[28]  Gordon Blunn,et al.  Osseocutaneous integration of an intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis implant used for reconstruction of a transhumeral amputee: case report. , 2010, The Journal of hand surgery.

[29]  K. Hagberg,et al.  One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[31]  A. Gall,et al.  Changes in the structural and material properties of the tibia in patients with spinal cord injury , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[32]  A. Nassr,et al.  Osseous anatomy of the distal humerus and proximal ulna: implications for total elbow arthroplasty. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[33]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  J. P. Beck,et al.  Fifteen years of experience with Integral-Leg-Prosthesis: Cohort study of artificial limb attachment system. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[35]  D D Robertson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Proximal Part of the Humerus: Relevance to Arthroplasty* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.