Assessment of Traffic Contribution to Hydrocarbons Using 2, 2-Dimethylbutane as a Vehicular Indicator

This study investigated the feasibility of using 2,2-dimethylbutane (22DMC4) as an unambiguous indicator for traffic emissions, and applied it to assess traffic contribution to individual hydrocarbons in an atmospheric environment. The concept involves using concentration ratios of individual non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) to 22DMC4, which are characteristic of traffic emissions to reveal excess concentration contributed by non- traffic sources. Air samples from three collections were analyzed for 22DMC4 and other NMHCs simultaneously to examine ratios of NMHCs/22DMC4. Two sample collections were made at different traffic transportation links in Kaohsiung City, and high concentration correlation was observed between 22DMC4 and most NMHCs for samples collected during heavy traffic hours. The third collection was made in the great Kaohsiung metropolitan area for comparison of NMHCs/22DMC4 ratios in different environments. Ratios of toluene/22DMC4 and ethene/22DMC4 obtained from the third collection were significantly greater than those from the two roadside collections in Kaohsiung City, suggesting other sources existed in addition to traffic. Comparing the NMHCs/22DMC4 ratios observed in a given area with the values obtained from pure traffic emissions as a reference can provide a quick diagnosis for non-traffic contributions. Another merit of using NMHCs/22DMC4 ratios of atmospheric components is to provide a basis of normalization, so that direct comparison of emission profiles collected in different times and places is possible.

[1]  V. Mugica,et al.  Hydrocarbon source apportionment in Mexico City using the chemical mass balance receptor model , 2000 .

[2]  D. Lowenthal,et al.  A preliminary apportionment of the sources of ambient PM10, PM2.5, and VOCs in Cairo , 2002 .

[3]  D. M. Cunnold,et al.  Atmospheric Trends and Lifetime of CH3CCI3 and Global OH Concentrations , 1995, Science.

[4]  W. Carter.  Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile Organic Compounds , 1994 .

[5]  E. Grosjean,et al.  Ambient levels of gas phase pollutants in Porto Alegre, Brazil , 1998 .

[6]  S. Zou,et al.  Volatile organic compounds in roadside microenvironments of metropolitan Hong Kong , 2002 .

[7]  J. Hlavay,et al.  Toluene−Benzene Concentration Ratio as a Tool for Characterizing the Distance from Vehicular Emission Sources , 1997 .

[8]  Il Moon,et al.  Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in an industrial area of Korea , 2001 .

[9]  Chih-Chung Chang,et al.  Assessment of reducing ozone forming potential for vehicles using liquefied petroleum gas as an alternative fuel , 2001 .

[10]  W. Carter,et al.  Computer modeling study of incremental hydrocarbon reactivity , 1989 .

[11]  Chih-Chung Chang,et al.  Analysis of methyl tert-butyl ether in the atmosphere and implications as an exclusive indicator of automobile exhaust , 2003 .

[12]  Jia-Lin Wang,et al.  Source determination of light non-methane hydrocarbons by simultaneous multi-site sampling in a metropolitan area , 2000 .

[13]  J. Tsai,et al.  VOC concentration characteristics in Southern Taiwan. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[14]  Zili Xu,et al.  Analyses of volatile organic compounds concentrations and variation trends in the air of Changchun, the northeast of China , 2000 .

[15]  Isaac Schifter,et al.  Exhaust Emissions from Gasoline- and LPG-Powered Vehicles Operating at the Altitude of Mexico City. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.