Biomass logistics as a determinant of second‐generation biofuel facility scale, location and technology selection

Feedstock logistics, as dictated by biomass physical properties, location, and distribution, as well as trans- portation infrastructure, were shown to be a primary determinant of the scale, location, and technology selection of any future biorefi neries. The maximum capacity of both biochemical- and thermochemical-based second-gen- eration biofuel facilities was established based on feedstock logistics including delivery mode (road, rail, or ship), maximum number of deliveries by mode, feedstock type (whole logs, chips, pellets, or bio-oil), and biofuel yield from those feedstocks. The world's largest ethanol plant, pulp mill, coal-based power plant, and oil refi nery were used to approximate maximum plant size for different technologies, and to set an upper limit on the number of deliver- ies logistically possible for each transport mode. It was apparent that thermochemical conversion to transportation biofuels was favored for large, multimodal coastal facilities that are able to receive imported biomass in the form of feedstock intermediates, such as pellets and bio-oil (maximum capacities of 2844 and 6001 million liters gasoline equivalent (MLGE) respectively). Biochemically-based conversion processes, primarily due to smaller economies of scale and the typical use of higher moisture content and undensifi ed feedstocks, such as whole logs and chips, are better suited for smaller facilities (maximum 1405 and 1542 MLGE, respectively) that rely on local feedstocks delivered by truck and/or rail. It was also apparent that optimization of the feedstock-intermediate-product chain, including biomass densifi cation for transportation and high conversion yield, is essential if the scale of the any sec- ond-generation biofuels facility is to be maximized. © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[2]  A. Faaij,et al.  International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance , 2005 .

[3]  P. M. Pelagagge,et al.  Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables , 2005 .

[4]  Martin A. Hubbe,et al.  WHAT HAPPENS TO CELLULOSIC FIBERS DURING PAPERMAKING AND RECYCLING? A REVIEW , 2007 .

[5]  K. Ptasinski.  Thermodynamic efficiency of biomass gasification and biofuels conversion , 2008 .

[6]  Amit Kumar,et al.  A comparison of pipeline versus truck transport of bio-oil. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[8]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Global Wood Pellets Markets and Industry: Policy Drivers, Market Status and Raw Material Potential , 2007 .

[9]  S. Sokhansanj,et al.  Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses , 2006 .

[10]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Updates on softwood-to-ethanol process development , 2006 .

[11]  Fabrizio Bezzo,et al.  A techno-economic comparison between two technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. , 2009 .

[12]  M. Balat,et al.  Progress in bioethanol processing , 2008 .

[13]  S. Duff,et al.  Extraction and hydrolysis of levoglucosan from pyrolysis oil. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Akwasi A. Boateng,et al.  Distributed processing of biomass to bio‐oil for subsequent production of Fischer‐Tropsch liquids , 2008 .

[15]  N. Shah,et al.  Spatially Explicit Static Model for the Strategic Design of Future Bioethanol Production Systems. 1. Cost Minimization , 2009 .

[16]  P. Badger,et al.  Use of mobile fast pyrolysis plants to densify biomass and reduce biomass handling costs—A preliminary assessment , 2006 .

[17]  P. Flynn,et al.  Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada , 2003 .

[18]  W. Mabee,et al.  Comparison of methods to assess the enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates , 2009, Biotechnology Letters.

[19]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  ECONOMICS OF PRODUCING FUEL PELLETS FROM BIOMASS , 2006 .

[20]  Young‐Kwon Park,et al.  Influence of reaction conditions and the char separation system on the production of bio-oil from radiata pine sawdust by fast pyrolysis , 2008 .

[21]  M. Almeida,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PROVENANCE, SUBSPECIES, AND SITE ON WOOD DENSITY IN EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS LABILL. , 2007 .

[22]  André Faaij,et al.  Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation , 2008 .

[23]  B. English,et al.  A Geographic Information System-based modeling system for evaluating the cost of delivered energy crop feedstock , 2000 .

[24]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass , 1999 .

[25]  Jennifer S. Holmgren,et al.  Consider upgrading pyrolysis oils into renewable fuels , 2008 .

[26]  I. Cullis,et al.  Effect of initial moisture content and chip size on the bioconversion efficiency of softwood lignocellulosics , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  Michael W Jack,et al.  Scaling laws and technology development strategies for biorefineries and bioenergy plants. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[28]  R.W.R. Zwart,et al.  High Efficiency Co-production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) and Fischer−Tropsch (FT) Transportation Fuels from Biomass , 2005 .

[29]  B. Jenkins.  A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling , 1997 .

[30]  Eija Alakangas,et al.  CEN technical specification for solid biofuels—Fuel specification and classes , 2006 .

[31]  Other,et al.  Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[32]  Xun Shi,et al.  Spatial distribution of agricultural residue from rice for potential biofuel production in China. , 2008 .

[33]  João Tomé Saraiva,et al.  Load allocation in DMS with a fuzzy state estimator , 2000 .

[34]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach , 2009 .

[35]  A. F. Turhollow,et al.  Biomass Densification - Cubing Operations and Costs for Corn Stover , 2004 .

[36]  André Faaij,et al.  Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential , 2004 .

[37]  R. Turkot,et al.  Particle control in dielectric etch chamber , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[38]  Huajiang Huang,et al.  Effect of biomass species and plant size on cellulosic ethanol: A comparative process and economic analysis , 2009 .

[39]  Jamie Stephen,et al.  Analysis of biomass feedstock availability and variability for the Peace River region of Alberta, Canada , 2010 .

[40]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries , 2007 .

[41]  Robinson,et al.  Fermentability of the hemicellulose-derived sugars from steam-exploded softwood (douglas fir) , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[42]  Peter C. Flynn,et al.  The impact of feedstock cost on technology selection and optimum size. , 2007 .

[43]  Robert F. Mulligan.  A Simple Model for Estimating Newbuilding Costs , 2008 .

[44]  M. Ruth,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios , 1999 .

[45]  A. Faaij,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term , 2005 .

[46]  Glenn P. Jenkins.  Information Technology and Innovation in Tax Administration, Glenn P. Jenkins (Ed.). Kluwer Law International (1996), 213, NLG 125.00/US $84.00/£56.00, ISBN: 90 411 09668 , 1997, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[47]  Hong Yang,et al.  Land and water requirements of biofuel and implications for food supply and the environment in China , 2009 .

[48]  Tony Kryzanowski.  DMI will save up to $8 million per year by adopting in-the-woods chipping , 2004 .

[49]  Staffan Melin,et al.  An environmental impact assessment of exported wood pellets from Canada to Europe. , 2009 .

[50]  Charles E Wyman,et al.  Potential Synergies and Challenges in Refining Cellulosic Biomass to Fuels, Chemicals, and Power , 2003, Biotechnology progress.

[51]  Paul W. Gallagher,et al.  Plant size: Capital cost relationships in the dry mill ethanol industry , 2005 .

[52]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[53]  P. Flynn,et al.  The Impact of Biomass Availability and Processing Cost on Optimum Size and Processing Technology Selection , 2009, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.