Genomic analysis of low‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma to identify key drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Low‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is associated with a poor response to existing chemotherapy, highlighting the need to perform comprehensive genomic analysis and identify new therapeutic vulnerabilities. The data presented here represent the largest genetic study of LGSOCs to date (n = 71), analysing 127 candidate genes derived from whole exome sequencing cohorts to generate mutation and copy‐number variation data. Additionally, immunohistochemistry was performed on our LGSOC cohort assessing oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, TP53, and CDKN2A status. Targeted sequencing identified 47% of cases with mutations in key RAS/RAF pathway genes (KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS), as well as mutations in putative novel driver genes including USP9X (27%), MACF1 (11%), ARID1A (9%), NF2 (4%), DOT1L (6%), and ASH1L (4%). Immunohistochemistry evaluation revealed frequent oestrogen/progesterone receptor positivity (85%), along with CDKN2A protein loss (10%) and CDKN2A protein overexpression (6%), which were linked to shorter disease outcomes. Indeed, 90% of LGSOC samples harboured at least one potentially actionable alteration, which in 19/71 (27%) cases were predictive of clinical benefit from a standard treatment, either in another cancer's indication or in LGSOC specifically. In addition, we validated ubiquitin‐specific protease 9X (USP9X), which is a chromosome X‐linked substrate‐specific deubiquitinase and tumour suppressor, as a relevant therapeutic target for LGSOC. Our comprehensive genomic study highlighted that there is an addiction to a limited number of unique ‘driver’ aberrations that could be translated into improved therapeutic paths. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  The molecular origin and taxonomy of mucinous ovarian carcinoma , 2019, Nature Communications.

[2]  A. deFazio,et al.  PARAGON: A Phase II study of anastrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive recurrent/metastatic low-grade ovarian cancers and serous borderline ovarian tumors. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  Molecular comparison of interval and screen‐detected breast cancers , 2019, The Journal of pathology.

[4]  C. Collins,et al.  Markers of MEK inhibitor resistance in low-grade serous ovarian cancer: EGFR is a potential therapeutic target , 2019, Cancer Cell International.

[5]  Li Zhou,et al.  Palbociclib for treatment of metastatic melanoma with copy number variations of CDK4 pathway: case report. , 2018, Chinese clinical oncology.

[6]  I. Campbell,et al.  Population-based genetic testing of asymptomatic women for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  Sebastian M. Armasu,et al.  Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study , 2018, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[8]  R. Bernards,et al.  ARID1A mutation sensitizes most ovarian clear cell carcinomas to BET inhibitors , 2018, Oncogene.

[9]  D. Etemadmoghadam,et al.  BRAF Mutations in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Response to BRAF Inhibition. , 2018, JCO precision oncology.

[10]  C. Le Page,et al.  Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[11]  G. Jayson,et al.  PARP inhibitors in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2018, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  E. Thompson,et al.  Evaluating the breast cancer predisposition role of rare variants in genes associated with low-penetrance breast cancer risk SNPs , 2018, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  J. Campisi,et al.  A novel suicide gene therapy for the treatment of p16Ink4a-overexpressing tumors , 2017, Oncotarget.

[14]  Y. Okuno,et al.  Exome Sequencing Landscape Analysis in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Shed Light on Key Chromosomal Regions and Mutation Gene Networks. , 2017, The American journal of pathology.

[15]  P. Raman,et al.  Overcoming resistance to single-agent therapy for oncogenic BRAF gene fusions via combinatorial targeting of MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways , 2017, Oncotarget.

[16]  Dale W. Garsed,et al.  EIF1AX and NRAS Mutations Co-occur and Cooperate in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas. , 2017, Cancer research.

[17]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Exceptional Response to Palbociclib in Metastatic Collecting Duct Carcinoma Bearing a CDKN2A Homozygous Deletion. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[18]  Moriah H Nissan,et al.  OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[19]  P. Stephens,et al.  Clinical Benefit in Response to Palbociclib Treatment in Refractory Uterine Leiomyosarcomas with a Common CDKN2A Alteration. , 2017, The oncologist.

[20]  D. Aoki,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of gynecologic cancer: The Cancer Genome Atlas in ovarian and endometrial cancer. , 2017, Oncology letters.

[21]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Hormonal Maintenance Therapy for Women With Low-Grade Serous Cancer of the Ovary or Peritoneum. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Kun Yu,et al.  PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing , 2016, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[23]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  R. Scott,et al.  Panel Testing for Familial Breast Cancer: Calibrating the Tension Between Research and Clinical Care. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Kyo,et al.  KRAS/BRAF Analysis in Ovarian Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma Having Synchronous All Pathological Precursor Regions , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[26]  S. Leung,et al.  An Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Ovarian Carcinoma Typing , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[27]  Guangchuang Yu,et al.  ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. , 2016, Molecular bioSystems.

[28]  P. Tauchi-Nishi,et al.  The LAST guidelines in clinical practice: implementing recommendations for p16 use. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.

[29]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes , 2015, Oncotarget.

[30]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Impact of Age and Primary Disease Site on Outcome in Women With Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary or Peritoneum: Results of a Large Single-Institution Registry of a Rare Tumor. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs , 2015, Biomarker Research.

[32]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Escape from X Inactivation Varies in Mouse Tissues , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[33]  Jos Jonkers,et al.  CopywriteR: DNA copy number detection from off-target sequence data , 2015, Genome Biology.

[34]  J. Gécz,et al.  La FAM fatale: USP9X in development and disease , 2015, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[35]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly , 2014, Genome research.

[36]  Ming Chen,et al.  A survival analysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology , 2014, OncoTargets and therapy.

[37]  J. George,et al.  Genomic Classification of Serous Ovarian Cancer with Adjacent Borderline Differentiates RAS Pathway and TP53-Mutant Tumors and Identifies NRAS as an Oncogenic Driver , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  G. McVean,et al.  Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[39]  J. Shendure,et al.  A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[40]  S. Kalloger,et al.  Stage II to IV Low-grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary Is Associated With a Poor Prognosis: A Clinicopathologic Study of 32 Patients From a Population-based Tumor Registry , 2013, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[41]  Mauricio O. Carneiro,et al.  From FastQ Data to High‐Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline , 2013, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[42]  C. Le Page,et al.  Specimen quality evaluation in Canadian biobanks participating in the COEUR repository. , 2013, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[43]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[44]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability , 2013, Nature.

[45]  R. Hazan,et al.  Correction: Exploiting MEK Inhibitor-Mediated Activation of ERα for Therapeutic Intervention in ER-Positive Ovarian Carcinoma , 2016, PloS one.

[46]  M. Morgan,et al.  Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[47]  I. Adzhubei,et al.  Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2 , 2013, Current protocols in human genetics.

[48]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[49]  G. Mills,et al.  Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[52]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[53]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[54]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Low‐grade serous carcinomas of the ovary contain very few point mutations , 2012, The Journal of pathology.

[55]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[56]  A. Gonzalez-Perez,et al.  Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[57]  J. George,et al.  Comparison of Expression Profiles in Ovarian Epithelium In Vivo and Ovarian Cancer Identifies Novel Candidate Genes Involved in Disease Pathogenesis , 2011, PloS one.

[58]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[59]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[60]  Christopher R. Vakoc,et al.  DOT1L/KMT4 Recruitment and H3K79 Methylation Are Ubiquitously Coupled with Gene Transcription in Mammalian Cells , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[61]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  The human genome browser at UCSC. , 2002, Genome research.

[62]  O. Skalli,et al.  Microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1, a novel target in glioblastoma. , 2017, International journal of oncology.

[63]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm , 2009, Nature Protocols.