Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities

Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective as the overarching theoretical underpinning in the context of IJVs, this study investigates (1) how exploitation capability and exploration capability as two critical building blocks of dynamic capabilities are independently and interactively associated with IJVs’ financial and competitive outcomes in an emerging economy, and (2) how the two context variables (IJV autonomy and organizational culture distance of IJV partners) moderate the effect of exploitation capability and exploration capability on IJV performance. Using a sample of 102 IJVs in an emerging economy, this study finds general support for the theoretical model. Results suggest that IJVs in a foreign emerging economy tend to perform better when they possess greater abilities to exploit current resources as well as by dynamically renewing their competitive advantage. Moreover, exploitation capability and exploration capability interact in such a way that they “reinforce” each other. Lastly, the contribution of exploitation capability and exploration capability to IJV performance is stronger when IJVs enjoy greater autonomy and when the organizational culture distance between partners of IJVs is small. Theoretical and managerial contributions are discussed and limitations and future research are explored.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[3]  Felicitas U Evangelista,et al.  Organizational context and knowledge acquisition in IJVs: An empirical study , 2009 .

[4]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[6]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[7]  P. Ahmed,et al.  Dynamic capabilities: A review and research , 2007 .

[8]  Cengiz Yilmaz,et al.  Organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An examination of relative effects of culture traits and the balanced culture hypothesis in an emerging economy , 2008 .

[9]  Scott L. Newbert.  Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research , 2007 .

[10]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2005 .

[11]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[12]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition and Knowledge Enablers in International Joint Ventures and their Foreign Parents , 2003 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[14]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[15]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy , 2002 .

[16]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The , 1993 .

[17]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[18]  A. Lewin,et al.  Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms: From Evolution to Co-evolution , 2003 .

[19]  B. Park.  What matters to managerial knowledge acquisition in international joint ventures? High knowledge acquirers versus low knowledge acquirers , 2010 .

[20]  N. Jimmieson,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Culture and Reshaping Capabilities on Change Implementation Success: The Mediating Role of Readiness for Change , 2005 .

[21]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[22]  K. Meyer,et al.  Contextualising organisational learning: Lyles and Salk in the context of their research , 2007 .

[23]  Marc Day,et al.  Exploitation and exploration learning and the development of organizational capabilities: A cross-case analysis of the Russian oil industry , 2007 .

[24]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Antecedents and Effects of Parent Control in International Joint Ventures , 2001 .

[25]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[26]  M. Nyaw,et al.  A Dual Parent Perspective on Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures: Lessons From a Developing Economy , 2001 .

[27]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[28]  Deepak K. Datta.  Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[29]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives , 2000 .

[30]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success , 2003 .

[31]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and the Sourcing of Technological Advantage: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry , 1997 .

[32]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[33]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[34]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[35]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[36]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Multiparty cooperation and performance in international equity joint ventures , 2004 .

[37]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[38]  Yong Suhk Pak,et al.  A Framework of Knowledge Transfer in Cross-Border Joint Ventures: An Empirical Test of the Korean Context (1) , 2004 .

[39]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  COMPETITION, COOPERATION, AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC RENTS: A SYNCRETIC MODEL , 1997 .

[40]  Maria J. Sanchez-Bueno,et al.  The continuing validity of the strategy‐structure nexus: new findings, 1993–2003 , 2009 .

[41]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Gratitude, nostalgia and what now? Knowledge acquisition and learning a decade later , 2007 .

[42]  T. Fang.  Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond , 2010 .

[43]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[44]  James G. March.  A Scholar's Quest , 2003 .

[45]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[46]  A. Madhok.  COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[47]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[48]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[50]  Wu Zhan,et al.  Acquisition of organizational capabilities and competitive advantage of IJVs in transition economies: The case of Vietnam , 2009 .

[51]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition and Performance of International Joint Ventures in the Transition Economy of Vietnam , 2004 .

[52]  Y. Zeira,et al.  Autonomy and Effectiveness of Equity International Joint Ventures (EIJVs): An Analysis based on EIJVs in Hungary and Britain , 1999 .

[53]  J. Child.  Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[55]  A. Rugman,et al.  A Note on the Transnational Solution and the Transaction Cost Theory of Multinational Strategic Management , 1992 .

[56]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE INSTABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES , 1997 .

[57]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy: Experience, Environment, and Performance , 1999 .

[58]  J. A. Zúñiga-Vicente,et al.  Strategic Moves and Organizational Survival in Turbulent Environments: The Case of Spanish Banks (1983-1997) , 2006 .

[59]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Cultures of Work Organizations. , 1992 .

[60]  Wu Zhan,et al.  Performance implications of capability exploitation and upgrading in international joint ventures , 2008 .

[61]  Yadong Luo.  Product diversification in international joint ventures: performance implications in an emerging market , 2002 .

[62]  R. Bhagat,et al.  On improving the robustness of Asian management theories: Theoretical anchors in the era of globalization , 2010 .

[63]  F. Damanpour,et al.  National and Organizational Culture Differences and International Joint Venture Performance , 2002 .

[64]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[65]  G. Pisano.  Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[66]  Johannes Meier,et al.  Solving the Puzzle: MNCs in China , 1995 .

[67]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test , 2002 .

[68]  Ming Zeng,et al.  Strategies for Competing in a Changed China , 2004 .

[69]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Equity Joint Ventures and the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 1987 .

[70]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[71]  D. Hambrick.  What if the Academy Actually Mattered , 1994 .

[72]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[73]  Jason A. Duan,et al.  Interpartner Fit and Its Performance Implications: A Four-Case Study of U.S.-China Joint Ventures , 2003 .

[74]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  In with the old, in with the new: capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios , 2009 .

[75]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[76]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[77]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Untangling the Effects of Overexploration and Overexploitation on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism† , 2008 .

[78]  Irina Skorobogatykh,et al.  Partner Selection and Trust Building in West European–Russian Joint Ventures , 1997 .

[79]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Capability Exploitation and Building in a Foreign Market: Implications for Multinational Enterprises , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization , 2007 .

[81]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[82]  Yadong Luo,et al.  From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China , 2007 .

[83]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change , 2000 .

[84]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[85]  Li Dong,et al.  National and corporate culture differences in international strategic alliances: Perceptions of Chinese partners , 2007 .

[86]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  The Evolving Value of Foreign Partnerships in Transitioning Economies , 2005 .

[87]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance , 2001 .

[88]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  Absolute and Relative Resources as Determinants of International Acquisitions , 2002 .

[89]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[90]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[91]  Yadong Luo.  Dynamic capabilities in international expansion , 2000 .

[92]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[93]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[94]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[95]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness , 2004 .