Ontology for Complex Mission Scenarios in Forensic Computing

Complex mission scenarios are those in which information changes continuously and quickly or scenarios having large quantities of expensive resources, a large number of norms and rules, or a large number of personnel, for instance crimes in cyberspace, computer forensics, or computer and digital investigation. Organisations participating in such scenarios may have components in different geographic locations: some in the field and others in the office. Enabling coordination between these components in highly unstable environments is a challenging task. Our aim is to investigate the use of ontology with computational agents to support complex mission scenarios in Forensic Computing. This paper presents a logicand set-based model to represent scenarios in the context of a formal organisation. In addition, an outstanding ontology was implemented that describes typical mission activities, their relationships, required resources, and constraints. This ontology is used to map a mission to an organisation. We also present a realistic ontology scheme in forensic computing for the Brazilian Federal Police and a case study in which agents from a formal organisation were deployed in complex mission scenarios. This ontology can be easily extended to other police or military forces, and is an efficient tool for managing people and resources.

[1]  Yves Demazeau,et al.  On Social Reasoning in Multi-Agent Systems , 2001, Inteligencia Artif..

[2]  Lou Goble,et al.  Preference semantics for deontic logic part I — Simple models , 2003 .

[3]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Computational-Mechanism Design: A Call to Arms , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  CONOISE: Agent-Based Formation of Virtual Organisations , 2003, SGAI Conf..

[5]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties , 2002 .

[6]  Scott Arthur Moody,et al.  Challenges in building scalable network centric real-time information dissemination systems , 2003, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 2003..

[7]  Hani Hagras,et al.  Creating an ambient-intelligence environment using embedded agents , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[8]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[10]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .

[11]  José Helano Matos Nogueira Mobile Intelligent Agents to Fight Cyber Intrusions , 2006 .

[12]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  Norm Verification and Analysis of Electronic Institutions , 2004, DALT.

[13]  José Helano Matos Nogueira,et al.  Manipulator Robots Using Partial-Order Planning , 1998, SBIA.

[14]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  A Distributed Architecture for Norm-Aware Agent Societies , 2005, DALT.

[15]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages , 2000, EKAW.

[16]  Alun Preece,et al.  Norm Refinement: Informing the Re-negotiation of Contracts , 2006 .

[17]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[18]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Stephanie M. White Requirements for distributed mission-critical decision support systems , 2006, 13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'06).

[20]  Lou Goble,et al.  A logic for deontic dilemmas , 2005, J. Appl. Log..

[21]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  Managing Conflict Resolution in Norm-Regulated Environments , 2008, ESAW.

[22]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  An Event Driven Approach to Norms in Artificial Institutions , 2005, AAMAS Workshops.

[23]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm-regulated virtual organizations , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[24]  Sara J. Casare,et al.  Uma ontologia funcional de reputação para agentes. , 2005 .