Analytical Study of Bundled MWCNT and Edged MLGNR Interconnects: Impact on Propagation Delay and Area

This research letter presents an accurate and efficient model for rough-edged multi-layered graphene nanoribbon (MLGNR) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) bundled interconnects. To address the impact of delay and area, an analytical finite-difference time-domain and real-time simulation based approach are considered. In order to obtain the propagation delay, an equivalent single conductor (ESC) model is accurately presented by simplifying a multi-conductor transmission line (MTL) of bundled MWCNT and MLGNR interconnects. The proposed equivalent ESC model is in good agreement to the MTL with an average deviation of 4.6% only. In order to validate the proposed model, the equivalent resistance, inductance, and capacitance values are compared with standard experimental results. It is observed that the model expression possesses a good agreement with experimental data with an average error of below 9.93%. Using the ESC-based driver-interconnect-load setup, an approximate number of MWCNTs in a densely packed bundle is obtained for a rough-edged MLGNR at 22 nm technology to obtain an equivalent delay. In order to acquire the equivalent propagation delay, a fewer number of MWCNTs in a bundle can provide similar performance as of MLGNR for below 200 μm interconnect length. Furthermore, the number of MWCNTs significantly increases for longer interconnects. Therefore, on an average, an edged MLGNR requires 97.98% lesser area compared to the bundled MWCNT for global interconnects. Hence, a rough-edged MLGNR can be treated as a most desired interconnect material as compared to MWCNT bundle for the future interconnect technology.

[1]  Xuhui Sun,et al.  Contact resistance in carbon nanostructure via interconnects , 2009 .

[2]  A. G. Fedorov,et al.  Fabrication of an UltraLow-Resistance Ohmic Contact to MWCNT–Metal Interconnect Using Graphitic Carbon by Electron Beam-Induced Deposition (EBID) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[3]  S. Nasiri,et al.  COMPACT FORMULAE FOR NUMBER OF CONDUCTION CHANNELS IN VARIOUS TYPES OF GRAPHENE NANORIBBONS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES , 2012 .

[4]  P. McEuen,et al.  Electron-Phonon Scattering in Metallic Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes , 2003, cond-mat/0309641.

[5]  H. Dai,et al.  Graphene nanoribbons with smooth edges behave as quantum wires. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Stability and delay analysis of multi-layered GNR and multi-walled CNT interconnects , 2015 .

[7]  B. Kaushik,et al.  Frequency response and bandwidth analysis of multi-layer graphene nanoribbon and multi-walled carbon nanotube interconnects , 2014 .

[8]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Comparative analysis of TL models for multilayer graphene nanoribbon and multiwall carbon nanotube interconnects , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  William Regan,et al.  Fermi velocity engineering in graphene by substrate modification , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[10]  A. Hazra,et al.  Graphene Nanoribbon as Potential On-Chip Interconnect Material—A Review , 2018, C.

[11]  J. Meindl,et al.  Compact physical models for multiwall carbon-nanotube interconnects , 2006, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[12]  Jorge A. Holguin-Lerma,et al.  Fabrication and Characterization of MWCNT-Based Bridge Devices , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[13]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective , 1995 .

[14]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Analysis of Delay and Dynamic Crosstalk in Bundled Carbon Nanotube Interconnects , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.