Aging and Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Ads: The Effects of Individual Differences and Risk Presentation

To determine how individual difference (age, cognition, and hearing) and risk presentation (audio frequency, speed, and organization) variables affect viewing of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug television ads, participants (N = 1,075) from four age groups across the adult lifespan took an in-person hearing examination, watched a DTC television ad, and responded to survey questions. Results showed that increased age was related to reduced cognition and hearing ability, as well as lower ad comprehension and risk recall. Greater speed and more complex organization of the ad’s risk information lowered risk recall and claim recognition. Audio frequency had no effect. Cognitive abilities mediated the relationship between age and risk recall. Our findings suggest that older adults are likely to have more difficulty recalling and understanding the risks presented in DTC television ads. Risk information can be presented in ways that facilitate or inhibit recall and recognition among individuals across the lifespan.

[1]  Helen W Sullivan,et al.  Communicating Risk Information in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Ads: A Content Analysis , 2019, Health communication.

[2]  Amie C O'Donoghue,et al.  Assessing hearing and cognition challenges in consumer processing of televised risk information: Validation of self-reported measures using performance indicators☆ , 2018, Preventive medicine reports.

[3]  Paul Gallagher,et al.  Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults , 2016, Therapeutic advances in drug safety.

[4]  Andrew T Chan,et al.  Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012. , 2015, JAMA.

[5]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Hearing, Cognition, and Healthy Aging: Social and Public Health Implications of the Links between Age-Related Declines in Hearing and Cognition , 2015, Seminars in Hearing.

[6]  A. Vallesi,et al.  Aging, Cognitive Load, Dementia and Hearing Loss , 2015, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  S. Stenfelt,et al.  Sounds perceived as annoying by hearing-aid users in their daily soundscape , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Karen A Doherty,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Various Types of Masker Noises , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[9]  N. Prepageran,et al.  “High Frequency Presbycusis”–Is There an Earlier Onset? , 2013, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.

[10]  H. Wahl,et al.  Managing daily life with age-related sensory loss: cognitive resources gain in importance. , 2012, Psychology and aging.

[11]  F. Lin,et al.  Hearing loss in older adults: who's listening? , 2012, JAMA.

[12]  Wesley K Thompson,et al.  Age, affective experience, and television use. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Aging and the Questionable Validity of Recognition-Based Exposure Measurement , 2010, Commun. Res..

[14]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing , 2008 .

[15]  E. Platz,et al.  Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Age, Memory Changes, and the Varying Utility of Recognition as a Media Effects Pathway , 2008 .

[17]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  F. Craik.  The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[19]  T. Busey,et al.  Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  The Letter Digit Substitution Test: Normative Data for 1,858 Healthy Participants Aged 24–81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): Influence of Age, Education, and Sex , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[21]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  Jon C Schommer,et al.  Television advertisement format and the provision of risk information about prescription drug products. , 2005, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[23]  J. Gallacher.  Hearing, cognitive impairment and aging: a critical review , 2005 .

[24]  M. Slater,et al.  Effects of threatening visuals and announcer differences on responses to televised alcohol warnings , 2002 .

[25]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[26]  W. Schneider.  Research on memory development: Historical trends and current themes , 2000 .

[27]  T Letowski,et al.  Comprehension of time-compressed speech: effects of age and speech complexity. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  E. Platz,et al.  Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Differences by Demographic Characteristics Among US Adults , 2017 .

[30]  P. Newall.  Validation of self-reported hearing loss , 2001 .

[31]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Spoken Language Comprehension in Older Adults: Interactions between Sensory and Cognitive Change in Normal Aging , 2001 .

[32]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[33]  M. Lezak.  Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[34]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[35]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Principles of voice production , 1994 .

[36]  K. Lormore,et al.  Use of the open-ended questionnaire with patients and their significant others. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[37]  P. Drinka,et al.  Self-reported hearing difficulty and audiometric thresholds in nursing home residents. , 1993, The Journal of family practice.

[38]  A Wingfield,et al.  Does the capacity of working memory change with age? , 1988, Experimental aging research.