Self-Organization of Cortical Receptive Fields and Columnar Structures in a Hebb Trained Neural Network

Existing models for the formation of cortical receptive field profiles, orientation maps, and ocular dominance stripes address the emergence of each or some of these features separately. The present work investigates a linear Hebb-trained neural network model for the simultaneous self-organization of receptive field profiles, their arrangement into orientation maps, and the segregation of ocular dominance stripes. Both ON- and OFF-center type input neurons are considered. The requirement of a simultaneous formation of several structures leads to the prediction of additional necessary properties of the input correlation functions. The receptive field- and orientation map formation behaviour predicts, that the range, where ON-ON-correlations exceed ON-OFF-correlations within the LGN, should be about 0.6 times the retinotopic radius of thalamocortical axonal arbors. Additionally, the emergence of ocular dominance stripes requires an asymmetry between ON-ON and ON-OFF correlation functions.

[1]  M. Stryker,et al.  Quantitative study of cortical orientation selectivity in visually inexperienced kitten. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  K. Obermayer,et al.  Statistical-mechanical analysis of self-organization and pattern formation during the development of visual maps. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[3]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Differential imaging of ocular dominance and orientation selectivity in monkey striate cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  M. Stryker,et al.  Binocular impulse blockade prevents the formation of ocular dominance columns in cat visual cortex , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Baylor,et al.  Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. , 1991, Science.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  The pattern of ocular dominance columns in macaque visual cortex revealed by a reduced silver stain , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Amiram Grinvald,et al.  Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel-like patterns , 1991, Nature.

[11]  K. Miller,et al.  Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. , 1989, Science.

[12]  R Linsker,et al.  From basic network principles to neural architecture: emergence of spatial-opponent cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Mackay,et al.  Analysis of Linsker's application of Hebbian rules to linear networks , 1990 .

[14]  KD Miller A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangement of orientation columns through activity-dependent competition between ON- and OFF-center inputs , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[16]  Müller,et al.  Neural network model for the coordinated formation of orientation preference and orientation selectivity maps. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[17]  R. C. Van Sluyters,et al.  The overall pattern of ocular dominance bands in cat visual cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.