A Reliability Study on Brain Activation During Active and Passive Arm Movements Supported by an MRI-Compatible Robot

In neurorehabilitation, longitudinal assessment of arm movement related brain function in patients with motor disability is challenging due to variability in task performance. MRI-compatible robots monitor and control task performance, yielding more reliable evaluation of brain function over time. The main goals of the present study were first to define the brain network activated while performing active and passive elbow movements with an MRI-compatible arm robot (MaRIA) in healthy subjects, and second to test the reproducibility of this activation over time. For the fMRI analysis two models were compared. In model 1 movement onset and duration were included, whereas in model 2 force and range of motion were added to the analysis. Reliability of brain activation was tested with several statistical approaches applied on individual and group activation maps and on summary statistics. The activated network included mainly the primary motor cortex, primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, superior and inferior parietal cortex, medial and lateral premotor regions, and subcortical structures. Reliability analyses revealed robust activation for active movements with both fMRI models and all the statistical methods used. Imposed passive movements also elicited mainly robust brain activation for individual and group activation maps, and reliability was improved by including additional force and range of motion using model 2. These findings demonstrate that the use of robotic devices, such as MaRIA, can be useful to reliably assess arm movement related brain activation in longitudinal studies and may contribute in studies evaluating therapies and brain plasticity following injury in the nervous system.

[1]  T. Kimberley,et al.  Reliability of fMRI during a Continuous Motor Task: Assessment of Analysis Techniques , 2008, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[2]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  Constantinos Mavroidis,et al.  Magnetic resonance-compatible robotic and mechatronics systems for image-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review study. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[4]  A. Schleicher,et al.  The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Two different areas within the primary motor cortex of man , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy and Long-Term Reproducibility of Brain Activation Associated with a Simple Finger Tapping Task in Older Healthy Volunteers: A Serial PET Study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[9]  V. Dietz,et al.  Brain activity during stepping: A novel MRI-compatible device , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  K. Zilles,et al.  Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex 2. Spatial Normalization to Standard Anatomical Space , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  Dr. Stefan Geyer.  The Microstructural Border Between the Motor and the Cognitive Domain in the Human Cerebral Cortex , 2004, Advances in Anatomy Embryology and Cell Biology.

[12]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  REPRODUCIBILITY OF TRIAL-BASED FUNCTIONAL MRI ON MOTOR IMAGERY , 2007, The International journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  R. Riener,et al.  Comparison of MRI-Compatible Mechatronic Systems With Hydrodynamic and Pneumatic Actuation , 2008, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[15]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human parietal operculum. II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Michael Borich,et al.  fMRI reliability in subjects with stroke , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human superior parietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  N Jon Shah,et al.  Assessment of reliability in functional imaging studies , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  M. Hepp-Reymond,et al.  Reproducibility of primary motor cortex somatotopy under controlled conditions. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  K. Amunts,et al.  Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  S. Kiebel,et al.  Brain Representation of Active and Passive Movements , 1996, NeuroImage.

[23]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Steven C. R. Williams,et al.  Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  Edward W. Hsu,et al.  Reliability of fMRI motor tasks in structures of the corticostriatal circuitry: Implications for future studies and circuit function , 2010, NeuroImage.

[26]  K. Zilles,et al.  Human Somatosensory Area 2: Observer-Independent Cytoarchitectonic Mapping, Interindividual Variability, and Population Map , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Prost,et al.  Motor homunculus: passive mapping in healthy volunteers by using functional MR imaging--initial results. , 2009, Radiology.

[28]  Tom Johnstone,et al.  Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple‐subject fMRI analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[29]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[30]  F. Chollet,et al.  Within-Session and Between-Session Reproducibility of Cerebral Sensorimotor Activation: A Test–Retest Effect Evidenced with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[32]  Ian Marshall,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reproducibility and variance components across visits and scanning sites with a finger tapping task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Riener,et al.  Tracking and analysis of human head motion during Guided fMRI motor tasks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[35]  Randy L. Gollub,et al.  Test–retest study of fMRI signal change evoked by electroacupuncture stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  Stefan Geyer,et al.  Prologue: Toward the Concept of a Cortical Control of Voluntary Movements , 2004 .

[37]  Robert Riener,et al.  fMRI assessment of upper extremity related brain activation with an MRI-compatible manipulandum , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[38]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[40]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Test–retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades , 2007, NeuroImage.

[42]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[43]  R W Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[44]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[45]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  r Human Brain Mapping 29:958–972 (2008) r Test–Retest and Between-Site Reliability in a Multicenter fMRI Study , 2022 .

[46]  N Ramnani,et al.  A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum , 2009, NeuroImage.

[47]  Keith M. McGregor,et al.  Motor map reliability and aging: a TMS/fMRI study , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.