Boundary factors and contextual contingencies: configuring electronic templates for healthcare professionals

In this paper, we propose an approach to balance the legitimate and yet conflicting perspectives between standardization and reconfiguration embedded within hospital information systems (HIS) design activities. We report on an action research study of the customization process of an electronic triage and tracking system that was reconfigured to be used in eight Canadian emergency departments. We argue that during HIS design activities, it is essential for both practitioners and system designers to articulate and identify which aspects can be standardized without constraining important local flexibility and which aspects require local reconfiguration to function in a particular work context. To identify these differences, we suggest an analytical distinction between boundary factors and contextual contingencies, which can be used in a design and reconfiguration process. We argue that the process of designing shared electronic templates should be perceived as a common design process, where multiple stakeholders articulate, identify, and negotiate boundary factors and contextual contingencies. Boundary factors are then represented within the shared electronic system, whereas contextual contingencies form the basis for constructing localized versions of the shared application. All local versions include both boundary factors and the reconfigured contextual contingencies.

[1]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[2]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[4]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[5]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[7]  K A Kuhn,et al.  The Core Problem : Autonomy and Consistency , 2018 .

[8]  Elihu M. Gerson,et al.  Analyzing due process in the workplace , 1986, COCS '86.

[9]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[10]  L. Suchman Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered , 1993 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Standardization of Work: Co-constructed Practice , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[13]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[14]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[16]  David W. Bates,et al.  The quality case for information technology in healthcare , 2002, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  Health Care Categories have Politics too: Unpacking the Managerial Agendas of Electronic Triage Systems , 2007, ECSCW.

[19]  Judith Gebauer,et al.  Enterprise System Flexibility and Implementation Strategies: Aligning Theory with Evidence from a Case Study , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[20]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-support Techniques and Medical Practices , 2022 .

[22]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Aksel Tjora,et al.  The technological mediation of the nursing-medical boundary , 2000 .

[24]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[25]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[26]  K. Kuhn,et al.  From Hospital Information Systems to Health Information Systems , 2001, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[27]  Diana E. Forsythe,et al.  “It's Just a Matter of Common Sense”: Ethnography as Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[28]  P. Checkland,et al.  Action Research: Its Nature and Validity , 1998 .

[29]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[32]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Do categories have politics? , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[33]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Whose work practice? Situating an electronic triage system within a complex system. , 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[34]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research , 2006 .

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Categories: Concept, content, and context , 1994, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  The organizing vision of integrated health information systems , 2008, Health Informatics J..

[39]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Implementing Common Systems: One Organization's Experience , 2011 .

[40]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  Steps toward a typology for health informatics , 2008, CSCW.

[41]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[42]  Marc Berg,et al.  The practice of medical technology. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[43]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[46]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Prediction models in the design of neural network based ECG classifiers: A neural network and genetic programming approach , 2002, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[47]  S. Kiesler The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[48]  Franz Schober,et al.  Information System Flexibility and the Cost Efficiency of Business Processes , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  Triage Drift: A Workplace Study in a Pediatric Emergency Department , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[50]  Neil Pollock,et al.  Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages , 2022 .

[51]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[53]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[54]  Wullianallur Raghupathi,et al.  Health care information systems , 1997, CACM.

[55]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms , 1997, CACM.

[56]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[57]  A. V. van Ginneken,et al.  Paper Versus Computer: Feasibility of an Electronic Medical Record in General Pediatrics , 2006, Pediatrics.

[58]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  A cross-case analysis of technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[59]  R. Rapoport Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[60]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[61]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Double-level languages and co-operative working , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.