Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences

Determining whether seed production is pollen limited has been an area of intensive empirical study over the last two decades. Yet current evidence does not allow satisfactory assessment of the causes or consequences of pollen limitation. Here, we critically evaluate existing theory and issues concerning pollen limitation. Our main conclusion is that a change in approach is needed to determine whether pollen limitation reflects random fluctuations around a pollen–resource equilibrium, an adaptation to stochastic pollination environments, or a chronic syndrome caused by an environmental perturbation. We formalize and extend D. Haig and M. Westoby's conceptual model, and illustrate its use in guiding research on the evolutionary consequences of pollen limitation, i.e., whether plants evolve or have evolved to ameliorate pollen limitation. This synthesis also reveals that we are only beginning to understand when and how pollen limitation at the plant level translates into effects on plant population dynamics...

[1]  T. Knight THE EFFECTS OF HERBIVORY AND POLLEN LIMITATION ON A DECLINING POPULATION OF TRILLIUM GRANDIFLORUM , 2004 .

[2]  T. Ashman,et al.  Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  C. Eckert The loss of sex in clonal plants , 2001, Evolutionary Ecology.

[4]  T. Ashman,et al.  The cost of floral longevity in Clarkia tembloriensis: An experimental investigation , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[5]  Priyanga Amarasekare,et al.  Spatial dynamics of mutualistic interactions , 2004 .

[6]  L. Noodén Plant cell death processes , 2004 .

[7]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  M. Finer,et al.  Effects of natural rates of geitonogamy on fruit set in Asclepias speciosa (Apocynaceae): evidence favoring the plant's dilemma. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[9]  D. Tilman,et al.  Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland , 2003 .

[10]  L. Harder,et al.  Reproductive Uncertainty and the Relative Competitiveness of Simultaneous Hermaphroditism versus Dioecy , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Olesen,et al.  Floral morphology and reproductive success in the orchid Epipactis helleborine: regional and local across-habitat variation , 2002, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[12]  T. Lennartsson Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations , 2002 .

[13]  J. Vonesh,et al.  Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines , 2002, Oecologia.

[14]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger‐seeded species , 2002 .

[15]  María B. García,et al.  Reproductive effort and herbivory timing in a perennial herb: fitness components at the individual and population levels. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[16]  T. Ashman,et al.  The Effects of Pollen Competition on Progeny Vigor in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) Depend on Progeny Growth Environment , 2002, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[17]  E. Crone IS SURVIVORSHIP A BETTER FITNESS SURROGATE THAN FECUNDITY? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[19]  V. Eckhart,et al.  Reproductive assurance and the evolutionary ecology of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). , 2001, American journal of botany.

[20]  L. Chittka,et al.  Successful invasion of a floral market , 2001, Nature.

[21]  S. Otto,et al.  THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY FOR SEED DISPERSAL: MODELING THE SEED-SHADOW HANDICAP , 2001 .

[22]  S. Otto,et al.  THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY FOR SEED DISPERSAL: MODELING THE SEED‐SHADOW HANDICAP , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  J. Thomson Using Pollination Deficits to Infer Pollinator Declines: Can Theory Guide Us? , 2001 .

[24]  R. Ishii,et al.  Coexistence induced by pollen limitation in flowering-plant species , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  T. Ashman,et al.  Sex Ratio Represents a Unique Context for Selection on Attractive Traits: Consequences for the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. McGraw,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of an Allee Effect in American Ginseng , 2001 .

[27]  S. Barrett,et al.  EVOLUTION OF FLORAL DISPLAY IN EICHHORNIA PANICULATA (PONTEDERIACEAE): DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION ON FLOWER SIZE AND NUMBER , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  I. Parker Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. , 2000 .

[29]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae). , 2000, American journal of botany.

[30]  S. Barrett,et al.  A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants , 2000 .

[31]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. , 2000 .

[32]  K. Bawa,et al.  The effect of ecological factors on the mating system of a South American shrub species (Helicteres brevispira) , 2000, Heredity.

[33]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set , 1999, Oecologia.

[34]  S. Mazer,et al.  RESPONSES OF FLORAL TRAITS TO SELECTION ON PRIMARY SEXUAL INVESTMENT IN SPERGULARIA MARINA: THE BATTLE BETWEEN THE SEXES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  G. Krupnick,et al.  THE CONSEQUENCES OF FLORAL HERBIVORY FOR POLLINATOR SERVICE TO ISOMERIS ARBOREA , 1999 .

[36]  R. Lande,et al.  EXTINCTION TIMES IN FINITE METAPOPULATION MODELS WITH STOCHASTIC LOCAL DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[37]  Ø. Totland,et al.  Variation in pollen limitation among plants and phenotypic selection on floral traits in an early-spring flowering herb , 1998 .

[38]  M. Groom,et al.  Allee Effects Limit Population Viability of an Annual Plant , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis with Resampling Tests , 1997 .

[40]  I. Parker POLLINATOR LIMITATION OF CYTISUS SCOPARIUS (SCOTCH BROOM), AN INVASIVE EXOTIC SHRUB , 1997 .

[41]  M. R. Dudash,et al.  MULTIYEAR STUDY OF POLLEN LIMITATION AND COST OF REPRODUCTION IN THE ITEROPAROUS SILENE VIRGINICA , 1997 .

[42]  W. Bond,et al.  Evidence for widespread pollen limitation of fruiting success in Cape wildflowers , 1997, Oecologia.

[43]  R. Mitchell Effects of pollination intensity on Lesquerella fendleri seed set: variation among plants , 1997, Oecologia.

[44]  J. Ågren Population Size, Pollinator Limitation, and Seed Set in the Self‐ Incompatible Herb Lythrum Salicaria , 1996 .

[45]  S. Strauss,et al.  Foliar Herbivory Affects Floral Characters and Plant Attractiveness to Pollinators: Implications for Male and Female Plant Fitness , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[46]  B. Husband,et al.  EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  Gary Paul Nabhan,et al.  The Forgotten Pollinators , 1996 .

[48]  S. Cunningham Ecological constraints on fruit initiation by Calyptrogyne ghiesbreghtiana (Arecaceae): FLORAL HERBIVORY, POLLEN AVAILABILITY, AND VISITATION BY POLLINATING BATS , 1995 .

[49]  T. Fleming,et al.  THE EFFECT OF POLLEN LIMITATION ON PLANT REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS AND THE MAINTENANCE OF SEXUAL POLYMORPHISMS , 1995 .

[50]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Pollen Limitation and Population Growth in a Herbaceous Perennial Legume , 1995 .

[51]  M. Burd OVULE PACKAGING IN STOCHASTIC POLLINATION AND FERTILIZATION ENVIRONMENTS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  R. Costantino,et al.  NONLINEAR DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS: MATHEMATICAL MODELS, STATISTICAL METHODS, AND BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS' , 1995 .

[53]  M. Aizen,et al.  HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, NATIVE INSECT POLLINATORS, AND FERAL HONEY BEES IN ARGENTINE, "CHACO SERRANO"' , 1994 .

[54]  William J. Bond,et al.  Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction , 1994 .

[55]  J. Lawton,et al.  Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems , 1994, Nature.

[56]  W. Kunin Sex and the single mustard : population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set , 1993 .

[57]  Miguel Franco,et al.  comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials , 1993 .

[58]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Variation in Pollen Limitation Among Individuals of Sabatia Angularis (Gentianaceae) , 1993 .

[59]  W. S. Lawrence Resource and Pollen Limitation: Plant Size-Dependent Reproductive Patterns in Physalis longifolia , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[60]  T. Young,et al.  Alternative Outcomes of Natural and Experimental High Pollen Loads , 1992 .

[61]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- Fertilization , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[62]  D. Murawski,et al.  The effect of the density of flowering individuals on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species , 1991, Heredity.

[63]  R. Primack,et al.  Costs of Reproduction in the Pink Lady's Slipper Orchid: A Four-Year Experimental Study , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[64]  C. Horvitz,et al.  Pollinator Limitation, Cost of Reproduction, and Fitness in Plants: A Transition-Matrix Demographic Approach , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[65]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). , 1990 .

[66]  Brian Dennis,et al.  ALLEE EFFECTS: POPULATION GROWTH, CRITICAL DENSITY, AND THE CHANCE OF EXTINCTION , 1989 .

[67]  D. Haig,et al.  On Limits to Seed Production , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[68]  G. Pyke,et al.  Reproduction in Polemonium: Assessing the Factors Limiting Seed Set , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[69]  M. Geber,et al.  Parental Investment in Offspring in Variable Environments: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[70]  J. Thomson,et al.  FLORAL BIOLOGY AND REGULATION OF SEED SET AND SEED SIZE IN THE LILY, CLINTONIA BOREALIS , 1985 .

[71]  N. Burley,et al.  Mate Choice in Plants , 1983 .

[72]  Paulette Bierzychudek,et al.  The Demography of Jack‐in‐the‐Pulpit, a Forest Perennial that Changes Sex , 1982 .

[73]  P. Bierzychudek Pollinator Limitation of Plant Reproductive Effort , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[74]  A. Stephenson Flower and Fruit Abortion: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Functions , 1981 .

[75]  J. Silander Density-Dependent Control of Reproductive Success in Cassia biflora , 1978 .

[76]  D. Janzen A Note on Optimal Mate Selection by Plants , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[77]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms , 1974, Heredity.

[78]  Bateman Aj Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. , 1948 .