Efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation--sub-analysis in Japanese population in RE-LY trial.

BACKGROUND RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) is an international multicenter study (18,113 patients from 967 centers in 44 countries) that demonstrated the ability of dabigatran to reduce the occurrence of both stroke and hemorrhage in patients who had atrial fibrillation (AF) with high risks of stroke compared with patients who received warfarin. From Japan, 326 patients were randomized in RE-LY. METHODS AND RESULTS RE-LY was designed to compare 2 fixed doses (110 mg or 150 mg, twice daily) of dabigatran, each administered in a blinded manner, with open-label use of warfarin. There were no major differences in patient demographic information among the overall study population and Japanese patients. However, in Japanese patients, the proportion of prior stroke was higher but prior myocardial infarction was lower than in the overall. The yearly rate for the primary endpoints (stroke and systemic embolism) was 1.38, 0.67 and 2.65%/year for 110 mg and 150 mg dabigatran twice daily and warfarin, respectively. These results were similar to the overall results (1.54, 1.11 and 1.71%/year for each group, respectively). For any bleeding, the relative risk of dabigatran at 110 mg and 150 mg twice daily over warfarin was 0.79 and 1.06, respectively, which was similar to the findings overall (dabigatran 110 mg twice daily: 0.78; 150 mg twice daily: 0.91). CONCLUSIONS In RE-LY, the efficacy and safety profiles of dabigatran for Japanese AF patients at high risk of stroke were essentially the same as for the study population overall.

[1]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Rationale and design of RE-LY: randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy, warfarin, compared with dabigatran. , 2009, American heart journal.

[4]  T. Kuwahara,et al.  Complications in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence and management. , 2009, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[5]  J. Stangier Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate , 2008, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[6]  Wansu Chen,et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Oral Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and No History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attacks , 2008 .

[8]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients Who Have Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Steven J Edwards,et al.  Stroke prevention with aspirin, warfarin and ximelagatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2006, Thrombosis research.

[10]  A. Barkun,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Cisapride, or Placebo in Helicobacter pylori Negative, Primary Care Patients with Dyspepsia: The CADET-HN Study , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis. , 2002, JAMA.

[12]  K. Minematsu,et al.  Optimal intensity of international normalized ratio in warfarin therapy for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2001, Internal medicine.