Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve.

AIMS To develop a simplified approach of virtual functional assessment of coronary stenosis from routine angiographic data and test it against fractional flow reserve using a pressure wire (wire-FFR). METHODS AND RESULTS Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) was performed in 139 vessels (120 patients) with intermediate lesions assessed by wire-FFR (reference standard: ≤0.80). The 3D-QCA models were processed with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to calculate the lesion-specific pressure gradient (ΔP) and construct the ΔP-flow curve, from which the virtual functional assessment index (vFAI) was derived. The discriminatory power of vFAI for ischaemia- producing lesions was high (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC]: 92% [95% CI: 86-96%]). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the optimal vFAI cut-point (≤0.82) were 88%, 90% and 86%, respectively. Virtual-FAI demonstrated superior discrimination against 3D-QCA-derived % area stenosis (AUC: 78% [95% CI: 70- 84%]; p<0.0001 compared to vFAI). There was a close correlation (r=0.78, p<0.0001) and agreement of vFAI compared to wire-FFR (mean difference: -0.0039±0.085, p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS We developed a fast and simple CFD-powered virtual haemodynamic assessment model using only routine angiography and without requiring any invasive physiology measurements/hyperaemia induction. Virtual-FAI showed a high diagnostic performance and incremental value to QCA for predicting wire-FFR; this "less invasive" approach could have important implications for patient management and cost.

[1]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Christopher D. Brushett,et al.  Volumetric assessment of lesion severity with optical coherence tomography: relationship with fractional flow. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Patricia V Lawford,et al.  Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  J. Messenger,et al.  A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Circulation.

[9]  G. Levine,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  David Brieger,et al.  Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. , 2011, European heart journal.

[12]  Ghassan S. Kassab,et al.  Quantification of fractional flow reserve based on angiographic image data , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .

[14]  William Wijns,et al.  Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: low volume means worse outcome. , 2010, European heart journal.

[15]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Blood Flow and Pressure in Human Coronary Arteries , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  In vivo validation of CAAS QCA‐3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS) , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. , 2006, Circulation.

[21]  N. Nicholls Reply: Climate change and Australian wheat yield , 1998, Nature.

[22]  W. Nichols,et al.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles , 1998 .

[23]  T J Donohue,et al.  Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[25]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Reiber,et al.  Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? , 1987, Circulation.

[28]  D. F. Young Fluid Mechanics of Arterial Stenoses , 1979 .

[29]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.

[30]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.