Developments in connected and automated vehicles

Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) technologies are a natural extension of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives that started in the early 1980s as a result of major advancements in the communication and computation areas. In the United States, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) generated the Automated Highway System (AHS) program (FHWA, 1994) and a concept demonstration in 1997 that was held in San Diego, California (FHWA, 1997). However, the major push forward in the area of connected vehicles happened with the proliferation of GPS-enabled in-vehicle navigation devices combined with mobile communication technologies in the 2000s. Around the same time, USDOT has recognized the potential of connected vehicles being able to communicate with each other as well as with the infrastructure and created a number of programs to expedite the deployment of such technologies (ITS JPO, 2017). Although the primary focus of USDOT’s connected vehicles program has been in safety applications aimed at reducing crashes on roadways, such technologies also have the clear potential of reducing congestion and improving mobility. The combination of all these potential benefits promised by emerging connected vehicle technologies attracted the attention of private sector, especially car makers and technology companies (The Economist, 2009). Connected vehicle technologies also fueled the emergence of a new generation of technology companies that are based on the concept of “mobility as a service.” This concept is bringing completely newbusiness models to the transportationmarket with the understanding of the change in the trends in the mobility industry (Viereckl, Ahlemann, & Koster, 2016). More recently, advances inmachine learning, e.g., deep learning, and computation made it possible to develop

[1]  K Shinkawa AN AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEM , 1996 .

[2]  Takayuki Morikawa,et al.  An optimal mandatory lane change decision model for autonomous vehicles in urban arterials , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[3]  Meng Li,et al.  Connected vehicle-based red-light running prediction for adaptive signalized intersections , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[4]  T. Imielinski,et al.  Ascertaining viability of WiFi based vehicle-to-vehicle network for traffic information dissemination , 2004, Proceedings. The 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8749).

[5]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement for Freeway Travel Time Estimation , 2009 .

[6]  Bin Ran,et al.  Safety evaluation for driving behaviors under bidirectional looking context , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[7]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Modeling of the dynamic flow propagation of multiple units of information under vehicle-to-vehicle communications based advanced traveler information systems , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[8]  Rua Luís,et al.  Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations , 2013 .

[9]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  H. Holland Connected Cars , 2018, Dialogmarketing und Kundenbindung mit Connected Cars.

[11]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  A Clustering Based Methodology for Determining the Optimal Roadway Configuration of Detectors for Travel Time Estimation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[12]  Intelligent decision making for overtaking maneuver using mixed observable Markov decision process , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[13]  Adam Danczyk,et al.  A mixed-integer linear program for optimizing sensor locations along freeway corridors , 2011 .

[14]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Optimizing the number and locations of freeway roadside equipment units for travel time estimation in a connected vehicle environment , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[15]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[16]  José Eugenio Naranjo,et al.  Application of vehicle to another entity (V2X) communications for motorcycle crash avoidance , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[17]  Sandeep Mudigonda EVALUATION OF A METHODOLOGY FOR SCALABLE 1 DYNAMIC VEHICULAR AD-HOC NETWORKS IN A 2 WELL-CALIBRATED VEHICULAR MOBILITY TEST BED , 2013 .

[18]  Taehyoung Kim,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of vehicle-to-vehicle applications in an urban network , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..