Eliciting, Interpreting and Developing Teachers' Understandings of the Nature of Science

This paper covers three main areas : eliciting teachers' views of the nature of science; interpreting and understanding these views; and developing them in the context of initial or in-service teacher education. The three areas clearly overlap but we begin with eliciting : this section includes a look at ‘past probes’, and then presents the notion of ‘critical incidents’, with a range of examples. We argue throughout that critical incidents can be used partly as a means of probing teachers' views of science, but also have value as a tool for professional development. We then discuss interpreting and understanding teachers' responses to critical incidents, based on our research with over 300 teachers and student teachers who have worked with them. In the third section, on developing, we pursue the argument that teachers' understandings of the nature of science are located in their professional experience. We argue that if teachers' understandings are embedded within their professional practice this has important consequences for appropriate teacher education and professional development in the area of the nature of science.

[1]  Mike Watts,et al.  Science in the national curriculum , 1991 .

[2]  L. Wolpert,et al.  The Unnatural Nature of Science , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[4]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Philosophy of science: an empirical study of teachers’ views , 1989 .

[5]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  When the black box springs open: practical work in schools and the nature of science , 1996 .

[6]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Science teachers’ philosophical assumptions: how well do we understand them? , 1995 .

[7]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[8]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  Analysis and Use of a Task for Identifying Conceptions of Teaching Science , 1989 .

[9]  Robin Smith,et al.  ‘Talking your way out of it’, ‘rigging’ and ‘conjuring’: what science teachers do when practicals go wrong , 1995 .

[10]  J. Wellington,et al.  Critical Incidents in the Science Classroom and the Nature of Science. , 1995 .

[11]  A. M. Lucas,et al.  Hidden assumptions in measures of knowledge about science and scientists , 1975 .

[12]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .

[13]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice , 1990 .

[14]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  Who will teach the ‘nature of science’?: teachers' views of science and their implications for science education , 1994 .

[15]  J. Wellington "What's Supposed to Happen, Sir?": Some Problems with Discovery Learning. , 1981 .

[16]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers’ personal theories , 1989 .