Evaluating Practice-based Learning and Teaching in Art and Design

The University of the Arts London is host to the Creative Learning in Practice Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CLIP CETL), which has funded a number of small course-based evaluative and developmental projects. These projects have been designed by course tutors in conjunction with the CLIP CETL team, who are evaluating them to better understand and extend the pedagogies of practice-based teaching and learning. Practice-based learning is a way of conceptualising and organising student learning which can be used in many applied disciplinary contexts. Such pedagogies we argue are founded on the claim that learning to practice in the creative industries requires engagement with authentic activities in context (Lave and Wenger 1991, Wenger 2000). This short paper will describe some of the initial evaluation and research activities in two colleges; identify and define practice-based activities in the context of the courses where the research is being carried out; identify emerging pedagogic frameworks; and discuss implications for further development. Activities identified in the projects undertaken include: Opportunities to develop students‟ direct contact with industry Simulating work-based learning in the University Event-based learning Enhancing professional practice and PPD The authors are seeking to elicit, analyse and evaluate what is often implicit in practitioner-teachers, and the experience of developing pedagogies for extending practice-based learning. We will be theorising from statements made by practitioners in semi-structured interviews and evidence provided in progress reporting from the project teams.

[1]  J. Gee.  Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces From The Age of Mythology to Today's Schools , 2005 .

[2]  D. Barton,et al.  Models of Adult Learning: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[3]  Mark Tennant,et al.  Learning and Change in the Adult Years: A Developmental Perspective. First Edition. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Service Series. , 1995 .

[4]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Qualitative Differences in Approaches to Teaching, Teacher Satisfaction and Communities of Practice in Art, Design and Communication Courses , 2003 .

[5]  Marijke Hezemans,et al.  Communities of Practice in Higher Education , 2004, Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning.

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[7]  Emma Hunt,et al.  Practising for the Profession. An investigation into a range of possibilities for work-based learning in an Art and Design FE/HE context , 2005 .

[8]  L. Drew.  The Experience of Teaching Creative Practices: Conceptions and Approaches to Teaching in the Community of Practice Dimension , 2004 .

[9]  David Barton,et al.  Literacy, reification and the dynamics of social interaction. , 2005 .

[10]  David Boud,et al.  New practices for new times , 2001 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[12]  D. Barton,et al.  Beyond Communities of Practice: Language , 2005 .

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[14]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[15]  A. Creese.  Beyond Communities of Practice: Mediating allegations of racism in a multiethnic London school: what speech communities and communities of practice can tell us about discourse and power , 2005 .

[16]  D. Boud.  Creating a work-based curriculum , 2001 .

[17]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[18]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[19]  J. Lave.  Teaching, as Learning, in Practice , 1996 .