The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes

This article examines whether performance-driven educational accountability policy enhances or hinders equity. Combining data from state policy surveys, F-33, SASS, and NAEP, the article shows that during the 1990s, the states did not address racial and socioeconomic disparities in school resources and failed to narrow the achievement gaps among racial and socioeconomic groups. The distributions of school expenditures, class size, qualified teachers, and mathematics achievement remained largely unchanged in strong accountability states. Although the accountability policy of the 1990s neither produced adverse effects nor brought about significant setbacks in equity, this article suggests that racial and socioeconomic equity were not at the center of accountability reforms and that performance-driven accountability policies alone cannot move us forward toward equity.

[1]  Derrick A. Bell join.  Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma , 1980 .

[2]  E. House.  Race and Policy , 1999 .

[3]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Administration , 1999 .

[4]  Richard R. Valencia,et al.  Let's Treat the Cause, Not the Symptoms: Equity and Accountability in Texas Revisited , 2001 .

[5]  Greg F. Orlofsky.  The Funding Gap: Low-Income and Minority Students Receive Fewer Dollars. , 2002 .

[6]  Linda E. Skrla,et al.  Displacing Deficit Thinking in School District Leadership , 2001 .

[7]  Chester E. Finn,et al.  State Academic Standards , 2001 .

[8]  A..  BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE INTEREST-CONVERGENCE DILEMMA , 2002 .

[9]  K. Pepper,et al.  When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale , 2001 .

[10]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations , 2003 .

[11]  G. Glass.  Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence , 2000 .

[12]  D. Grissmer,et al.  Searching for Indirect Evidence for the Effects of Statewide Reforms , 2001 .

[13]  Kerry J. Gruber,et al.  Qualifications of the Public School Teacher Workforce: Prevalence of Out-of-Field Teaching, 1987-88 to 1999-2000. Statistical Analysis Report. , 2002 .

[14]  Linda Darling-Hammond.  Accountability for Professional Practice , 1989, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  Mimi Engel,et al.  The Grasshopper and the Ant: Motivational Responses of Low-Achieving Students to High-Stakes Testing , 2001 .

[16]  Chandra Muller,et al.  Raising the Bar and Equity? Effects of State High School Graduation Requirements and Accountability Policies on Students' Mathematics Course Taking , 2003 .

[17]  Margaret E. Goertz,et al.  Assessment and Accountability Systems in the 50 States, 1999-2000. CPRE Research Report Series. , 2001 .

[18]  Francis X. Shen,et al.  Rethinking the Fiscal Role of the States in Public Education , 2022 .

[19]  David W. Grissmer,et al.  Improving Student Achievement: What State NAEP Test Scores Tell Us , 2000 .

[20]  Jaekyung Lee.  Racial and Ethnic Achievement Gap Trends: Reversing the Progress Toward Equity? , 2002 .

[21]  J. Finn,et al.  Answers and Questions About Class Size: A Statewide Experiment , 1990 .

[22]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Anthony S. Bryk , Stephen W. Raudenbush , 1994 .

[23]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence , 2000 .

[24]  Assessment Policy and Political Spectacle. , 1999 .

[25]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Opportunity-to-Learn Standards and the State Role in Education , 1995, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[26]  Kenneth K. Wong.  Advances in educational policy , 1995 .

[27]  David W. Grissmer,et al.  EXPLORING RAPID ACHIEVEMENT GAINS IN NORTH CAROLINA AND TEXAS , 1998 .

[28]  Walt Haney.  The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education , 2000 .

[29]  Richard R. Valencia,et al.  Let's Treat the Cause, Not the Symptoms: Equity and Accountability in Texas Revisited , 2001 .

[30]  Sherman Dorn.  The Political Legacy of School Accountability Systems , 1998 .

[31]  C. Hoxby.  The Cost of Accountability , 2002 .

[32]  Nancy Protheroe.  Fighting to Save Our Urban Schools...and Winning!: Lessons from Houston , 2001 .

[33]  A. Krueger,et al.  Would Smaller Classes Help Close the Black-White Achievement Gap? , 2001 .

[34]  A. Wise,et al.  Legislated Learning: The Bureaucratization of the American Classroom. , 1980 .

[35]  J. Bishop,et al.  The Role of End-of-Course Exams and Minimum Competency Exams in Standards-Based Reforms , 2001 .

[36]  Brian A. Jacob.  American Educational Research Association Getting Tough ? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams , 2001 .

[37]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[38]  B. Levin,et al.  Reforming Education: From Origins to Outcomes , 2001 .

[39]  Jaekyung Lee,et al.  Multiple Facets of Inequity in Racial and Ethnic Achievement Gaps , 2004 .

[40]  Jay M. Shafritz,et al.  Classics of Organization Theory , 1992 .

[41]  H. Heneman,et al.  School-Based Performance Award Programs, Teacher Motivation, and School Performance: Findings From a Study of Three Programs , 2000 .

[42]  Paul E. Barton.  Raising Achievement and Reducing Gaps: Reporting Progress toward Goals for Academic Achievement in Mathematics. Lessons from the States. , 2002 .

[43]  Jaekyung Lee.  State Activism in Education Reform: Applying the Rasch Model to Measure Trends and Examine Policy Coherence , 1997 .

[44]  Rosemary S. Caffarella,et al.  The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited. , 2005 .

[45]  T. Allen.  High Stakes Research , 2006 .

[46]  Joseph F. Johnson,et al.  Equity-driven, achievement-focused school districts , 2000 .

[47]  Joseph F. Johnson,et al.  Accountability for equity: can state policy leverage social justice? , 2001 .

[48]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale , 2000 .

[49]  Richard D. Kahlenberg.  A notion at risk : preserving public education as an engine for social mobility , 2000 .

[50]  G. Cawelti,et al.  High Student Achievement: How Six School Districts Changed into High-Performance Systems. , 2001 .

[51]  V. Lee,et al.  Social Support and Achievement for Young Adolescents in Chicago: The Role of School Academic Press , 1999 .

[52]  Jaekyung Lee.  State policy correlates of the achievement gap among racial and social groups , 1998 .

[53]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement , 1996 .

[54]  C. Swanson,et al.  Standards-Based Reform in Practice: Evidence on State Policy and Classroom Instruction from the NAEP State Assessments , 2002 .

[55]  Liz Sandals Minister.  Education Week , 1923 .

[56]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Accountability and School Performance: Implications from Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[57]  Gary Benveniste,et al.  The Design of School Accountability Systems , 1985 .

[58]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools , 1999 .

[59]  D. Berliner,et al.  High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning , 2002 .

[60]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis , 2002 .

[61]  Ronald F. Ferguson.  Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money , 1991 .

[62]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us , 2000 .

[63]  M. Goertz.  STATE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS: A 50‐STATE SURVEY , 1986 .

[64]  Allen S. Mandel.  Comment … , 1978, British heart journal.

[65]  M. Carnoy,et al.  Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis , 2002 .